No one said that was the only way to appreciate their beauty. This thread just happens to be about appreciating their visual beauty.


SY do have connections to porn.



this is the non sonics section

And finally; chill dude. Women were designed by nature to attract the attention of males. No one here is saying they hate women... i think. Most women like it too. Because that means they know they attract men. It makes em feel good. Thats why they all do sexy poses when they take pictures an shit. Why they model. If they felt objectified they wouldnt do it. Its all nature dude.

Christ, are you deliberately trying to open a can of worms?

And what are those?

ha ha ha-- yes.

also, richard kern. self-professed maker of "porn for rich people".

well, if a man works hard all day he can do what he wants to, at night...

Are you the same person who authored this thread? http://terminal-boredom.com/forums/i...?topic=33421.0

This board's interestingness has always been cyclical around the appearance of cool girls who eventually get pissed off with the creeps/bros and leave.

Years ago, probably 7 or 8 years ago, when I was more interested in this place and it was busier, I thought about creating a female alter ego here and posting for a while, just long enough to see who would start PMing me creepy stuff, or whatever, and then making a thread of screen grabs of creepy PMs. I kind of regret not doing it.

Who is that?

Richard Kern has connections to porn, but the work that people know him for isn't porn, and the stuff he did that SY got involved with isn't porn either, even Fingered which is the most graphically sexual of the Kern stuff that I've seen isn't porn in my book.


Anywho, this thread is lame.

Thurston did a soundtrack for one of his things. it was porn

Thurston also cheated on his wife.

oh come on, of course he did porn,only with slightly better taste than the usual. he also was a methhead. he was never a paragon of moral virtue.


mostly, yes, but so is 90% of everyday life.


porn!

he used to sell drugs too as i understand

anyway completely unrelated i was thinking of more hot redheads and there is samantha power. she's not "hot" in the usual sense and doesn't have model looks (here eyebrows are very low, i don't know how to say this) but if you hear her speak you'll be smitten with her super-smarts.




she once called hillary clinton "a monster" and is currently up for u.s. senate confirmation as the next ambassador to the u.n.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7l9yDbDNXM

delicious!

and yes, yes, she might scratch her head a bit like an ape, but i'm sure it's so the ideas flow better-- i think she's brilliant.

I knew he was a drug addict and I'm not concerned by his morals, but I think that because his films and photography aren't made solely as a tool for the sexual gratification of the viewer then in my book they don't count as pornography, even if they could be described as pornographic.

Completely agree

alright, let me try something:

<devil's advocate>
where do you draw the line though? is in in the artist's intention? is it in the audience's reception? if some rich guy jerks off in his bedroom looking at a picture he paid thousands for in a gallery then it's not porn, but if i's a truck driver in a rest stop looking at a magazine it's porn? doe the educated get horny with different materials than the educated? a plump chick bent over a car hood is filthy commerce but a skinny chick with a gun on her perfect tits is art? that sounds a bit like class discrimination to me.
</devil's advocate>

i don't necessarily take all those arguments as my own but there they are nevertheless!

(also: i don't enjoy actual low-class porn in this thread, but those are my overeducated/underpaid sensibilities which can't be universalized)

I read an article once about a man who is sexually around by cars and he liked to have sex with the exhaust pipe, but that doesn't mean that autotrader is a porno mag just because somebody can manage to jerk off to it, regardless of their social background.

Anyway, it's one of those vague art questions about where you draw the line....I'll have to think about this later, or I'll be late for dinner with the mother of someone you think is awesome.

Sasha Grey & Kim Gordon

He's just done another soundtrack for Kern's latest book/dvd...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Shot-Kern-mi...0886497&sr=1-1

And also, just because some paeadophiles jerk off to pictures of naked babies it doesn't mean that the babies' nudity is pornography. I think that if you're easily aroused by nudity in contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose you ought to question your attitudes towards sex and your own sex life in general.

right, pedophiles ruined baby photography for all.

the thing is though, contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose are hard to come by these days.

as for me, i'll say this: when i see the picture of a very beautiful woman (e.g., that one i posted above) what i often get is not a boner but a lump in the throat. what does that mean? i don't fucking know, but i hope it's not cancer.



the thing with kern is that he walks right on that line and you could legitimately say he makes porn and he is an artist and be correct on both counts. kern himself has said repeatedly he makes porn for rich people and while he might mean it ironically one could also take his words at face value. besides, porn and art have been together for milennia. i think ultimately pornographers are just terrible artists, with rare exceptions like just jaecquin or kern himself.

im rambling on a bad internet connection in a non-air-conditioned room at midday. probably makes for bad reasoning.

anyway, have fun.

Paedophiles only taint the enjoyment you'll feel by watching kids clumsily undress themselves if you are already a person attracted to them in a sexual way. Context in art is something that isn't as demanded as before but it's there and only waiting for a roll call. I don't think there is a lack of it, it's just much harder work to explain it because distraction and whinging seem to dominate the modus operandi of human interaction for most people these days. My foot hurts, my dog hurts, something hurts not too far away for me.

Finally. I LOVE RICHARD KERN! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caqxHral2iY

if a man works hard all day he can do what he wants to, at night...

heaven forbid, I remain chaste and restrained for my heart is pledged to the LORD.

hm, don't forget everyone is fucking "offended"

must not offend

anyway som time ago i can't remember when we're watching some french movie i don't remember so well but there's this naked toddler jumping about and it's sort of hilarious but then i say "this movie no fucking way in hell could have been made in america" (because of little baby weewee is likely "pornography" here and naked babies must wear at least loincloth).

which brings to mind that like a decade ago (or more?) an afghan man in the yooessey was accused of child abuse because he followed his native custom of kissing (a peck, mind you, not some slurpee mess) his newborn's tiny family sceptre (which is i read some sort of homage to the patrilinieal heritage of such primitives). but anyway. i thought it was bizarre that he gets accused of a crime while he was acting in complete innocence.

anyway i was reminded of this because i rewatched "the tit and the moon" the other day and there it is again, a boy going at a nipple hard (the lucky bastard, two nipples actually). and it's a lovely, beautiful movie. but you know, in america tits are porno but machine gun massacres with 3D explosions are good and wholesome family entertainment.

anyway, since ythis is the thread for beautiful women, here are two:

Who is it ?

You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.

I tried to spread it around like crazy to be able to rep you on this, but I got blocked..

I believe it's, Sasha Grey:

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Sasha+Grey

http://vimeo.com/13764968

That chick is a bit fat tbh:/

that is not fair, fat is a relative term, most men with any warm blood would call that thick. however and again, I do not support this thread, but even less support dissing otherwise attractive women with more cushion than some folks like. its a free world, thick chicks will rock your world AND take excellent care of you. top model chicks? Pain in the a$$, like Game said,

Yeah, that was just my point of view... Anyway... I'm a straight female so I guess it's normal that I'm not attracted to her:p

teri gender bender from le butcherettes

New director at Baltimore's Contemporary Museum of art, Deana Haggag.

http://strangerswithstyle.files.word...h49.jpg?w=1365

and this is a problem for you because....???

guys with tiny thin pencil dicks can't handle the bigger girls.

i'm thinking calling one's self "pink unicorn" might be a way to overcompensate.

London Andrews is gorgeous.
Fuck weight-shaming.