Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination? (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=113183)

The Soup Nazi 08.02.2020 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Speaking of EPIC FAILS......remember last page when Soup proclaimed he put me on ignore : )

It appears Soup deleted that post......that nazi can’t quit me!


I haven't deleted shit, motherfucker:

http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/sho...5&postcount=29

It was a different thread. Top-notch reporting skills there, fuckface.

Bytor Peltor 08.02.2020 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
I haven't deleted shit, motherfucker:

http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/sho...5&postcount=29

It was a different thread. Top-notch reporting skills there, fuckface.


HEY-I finally got something wrong : )

Well, the part about deleting a post. However, I was correct about Soup not being able to quit me because he’s no better at ignoring than Skuj!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
I've asked for one example. Bytor has asked for one example.

Kindly present?


CRICKETS

h8kurdt 08.02.2020 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
I wasn't there, but there was a small demonstration to defund the police in front of the Public Safety Complex this evening (about which cause which I have mixed feelings, as I do believe that police are overtasked with social service issues which their training doesn't really equip them to handle, and would better be handled by social services professionals, yet understand that the police are first on the scene, and should be fully funded to operate with social services backup available).

Five arrests were made, largely in response to the arrest a couple of days ago of a teenaged girl for allegedly striking an officer with her bullhorn (the law around here only allows amplification at demonstrations to the point that it's barely audible, as I indicated in an earlier post about a BLM demo I attended where I couldn't hear a thing), along with a man who allegedly attempted to interfere with her arrest.

Anyways, one observer at this evening's demo said the following: “Look at them, they are dressed to the nines of riot gear. They are over funded not supporting the needs of the community and the needs of communities across the country,” Justin Bloomberg said.

I would disagree with that statement, as I attended the huge (40.000 strong) demonstration in Boston of August 2017 where there was a near-riot, and the police there were wearing body armor and plastic shin guards. The Providence police shown here are wearing helmets and carrying clubs and shields, but nothing else. They certainly weren't wearing full combat gear as were about a dozen of the police who responded to the murder I witnessed last August.
.


That aged like milk didn't it.

h8kurdt 08.02.2020 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
"With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???"

Trump shitting himself cos he's realised there's a good chance he might lose the election. Imagine if Obama had suggested the same under similar circumstances.


Trump's bummers on here have been n
mightily quiet about this haven't they. Surely they don't agree with delaying the election?

Bytor Peltor 08.02.2020 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
PROMOTE ABORTIONS OF BABIES
Fact-check: Do Democrats support abortion up until (and after) birth?......Statesman (February 2020)

“ Republican lawmakers questioned the bill's sponsor on the scope of the proposal, asking whether the measure would allow a woman who is dilating to get a abortion.

"My bill would allow that," said Democratic lawmaker Kathy Tran. "Yes."

On Late-Term Abortion, 2020 Democrats Are to the Left Even of Obama in 2008......NationalReview (July 2019)


“Do you believe a woman should be able to terminate a pregnancy up until the moment of birth?” Martha MacCallum asked Bernie Sanders at a Fox News town hall. “I think that that happens very, very rarely,” Sanders replied, before concluding: “The decision over abortion belongs to a woman and her physician, not the federal government, not the state government.


I provide quotes regarding many Democrats desires for the killing of full term babies who are still inside a dilating mother......or even after birth. Just to be clear, a woman is considered to be in the active stage of labor once the cervix dilates to around 5 to 6 cm and contractions begin to get longer, stronger, and closer together.

h8kurdt has shown his true colors!

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Allow free choice for women to have abortions? Why wouldn't I?


Only SICKOS would approve of killing a healthy baby after it has been born!!!

There was once a time when Democrats were in full agreement concerning abortion after the first trimester......they were against it! The only exception being the life of the mother.

But as I have shown above, many Democrats desire the women’s ability to have her child killed during the dilation process......or even more sickening, once the child has been removed from the birthing canal.

Anyone who still has their morals in tact should be very concerned about the quotes above. It took just a couple months of a pandemic before the government started shutting down churches and backyard barbecues......all while approving of the hundreds upon hundreds who made up the mobs in the streets.

These are the things people will be voting about in just over three months......and who will name the replacement of Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court?

Bytor Peltor 08.02.2020 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Surely they don't agree with delaying the election?


100% disagree......FIRST Tuesday in November!!!

Stand in line with your mask on and cast your vote!!!

Nevada shenanigans

“Gov. Sisolak and the NV Dems called a special session with no public present and inside 24 hours are ramming through mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting. They are massively altering our election 97 days out entirely without the SecState. They are working to steal our election“

The Soup Nazi 08.02.2020 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Nevada shenanigans

“Gov. Sisolak and the NV Dems called a special session with no public present and inside 24 hours are ramming through mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting. They are massively altering our election 97 days out entirely without the SecState. They are working to steal our election“


Wanted an example, douchebag? There's your example. Quoting from the co-chair of Trump's campaign in Nevada, spewing bullshit. Now it's your duty to show me the respective fact-checking, imbecile.

Bytor Peltor 08.02.2020 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
There's your example. Quoting from the co-chair of Trump's campaign in Nevada, spewing bullshit. Now it's your duty to show me the respective fact-checking


The former Attorney General of Nevada’s first statement:

“Gov. Sisolak and the NV Dems called a special session with no public present and inside 24 hours are ramming through mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.”

According to the Reno Gazette Journal:
Gov. Steve Sisolak issued a formal proclamation Thursday to call the Nevada Legislature into its second special session beginning at 9 a.m. Friday, July 31.

In the proclamation, the following policy items are included for consideration:

Ensuring Nevadans can exercise their fundamental right to vote in a way that does not dangerously expose them to increased risk of COVID-19 infection


“They’ve got to address the liability issue, because the lawsuits have already started, Lokken added. “And the November election. … I think they’ll definitely want to push the mail-in (ballot) issue.”

Mail-in ballot issue
”Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske has long signaled her intention to return to in-person voting after COVID forced officials to hold the state’s first vote-by-mail primary election in June.

Nevada’s lone Republican statewide officeholder on Friday confirmed she was sticking to that plan despite a statewide spike in virus cases, explaining she would need a budget bump of up to $5 million to pay for a second all-mail election.”


Hard for me to prove what he was concerned about other than linking his tweet, but the facts were accurate!

The Soup Nazi 08.02.2020 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
The former Attorney General of Nevada’s first statement:

“Gov. Sisolak and the NV Dems called a special session with no public present and inside 24 hours are ramming through mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.”

According to the Reno Gazette Journal:
Gov. Steve Sisolak issued a formal proclamation Thursday to call the Nevada Legislature into its second special session beginning at 9 a.m. Friday, July 31.

In the proclamation, the following policy items are included for consideration:


Ensuring Nevadans can exercise their fundamental right to vote in a way that does not dangerously expose them to increased risk of COVID-19 infection

“They’ve got to address the liability issue, because the lawsuits have already started, Lokken added. “And the November election. … I think they’ll definitely want to push the mail-in (ballot) issue.”

Mail-in ballot issue
”Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske has long signaled her intention to return to in-person voting after COVID forced officials to hold the state’s first vote-by-mail primary election in June.

Nevada’s lone Republican statewide officeholder on Friday confirmed she was sticking to that plan despite a statewide spike in virus cases, explaining she would need a budget bump of up to $5 million to pay for a second all-mail election.”


Hard for me to prove what he was concerned about other than linking his tweet, but the facts were accurate!


The former AG's colorful depiction of this as "ramming through" legislation is irrelevant; he can go get rammed in the ass for all I care. Here's the real point:

Quote:

In the proclamation, the following policy items are included for consideration:

Ensuring Nevadans can exercise their fundamental right to vote in a way that does not dangerously expose them to increased risk of COVID-19 infection.

WHY. IS. MAIL-IN BALLOT. WRONG? It is legal, it is extremely appropriate during this pandemic, and unless you can prove Nevada is expecting a few Jumbo-jets sent by Xi Jinping jam-packed with fake votes to favor Biden, you can go fuck a goat.

Bytor Peltor 08.02.2020 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
WHY. IS. MAIL-IN BALLOT. WRONG


Mail-in ballots have always been an option to those who requested it due to being out of town or unable to get around.

Everyone is in favor of that! More importantly, the previous way of conducting the mail-in option didn’t require the Governor’s signature:

KOLO ABC Nevada
The bill originally introduced in the Nevada Assembly passed the Nevada Senate on Sunday. Voting was along party lines.

The bill, which allows ballots to be mailed to all active voters, goes to Gov. Steve Sisolak for approval.


Individuals who purchase a lottery ticket, they have the option to mail-in their winning ticket to the lottery commission......but who is foolish enough to trust the postal system with a million dollar winning lottery ticket???

The Soup Nazi 08.02.2020 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Individuals who purchase a lottery ticket, they have the option to mail-in their winning ticket to the lottery commission......but who is foolish enough to trust the postal system with a million dollar winning lottery ticket???


Better than trust it on a chad. Christ on a STICK you're stupid. Bye-bye.

!@#$%! 08.02.2020 03:14 PM

i just wanted to say that beauregard and skunk are uglier in writing than in photo, and that’s saying A LOT.

meaning their outsides reflect their insides after all haaa haaahaaaaaaaa haaaaaaa

(in my opinion of course)

fuck off you dogs

tw2113 08.02.2020 06:37 PM

my butthole hurts

Diesel 08.03.2020 10:37 AM

Why are people quoting the daily mail?

h8kurdt 08.03.2020 11:32 AM

Quote:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
4h
In an illegal late night coup, Nevada’s clubhouse Governor made it impossible for Republicans to win the state. Post Office could never handle the Traffic of Mail-In Votes without preparation. Using Covid to steal the state. See you in Court!

Reckon he was meant to keep the bit about republicans not winning the state quiet? Oh Trump...

Bytor Peltor 08.03.2020 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Individuals who purchase a lottery ticket, they have the option to mail-in their winning ticket to the lottery commission......but who is foolish enough to trust the postal system with a million dollar winning lottery ticket???


I forgot to mention that those winning lottery tickets must be signed before redemption can occur......speaking of signatures: Why the Botched N.Y.C. Primary Has Become the November Nightmare

Ari Fletcher tweet
“An absentee ballot without a signature is not a “minor error”. It is a ballot that must be rejected. If ballots sent in lack signatures, there is no way to match them against voter rolls to be sure the ballot is genuine. Signatures matter. Postmarks too.”

The Soup Nazi 08.03.2020 11:37 PM

If USPS can deliver your Amazon shit overnight, it can do the same with ballots. Fuck it, let's put Darth Bezos in charge of this operation: everything will arrive on time, there will be a huge turnout (AS THERE SHOULD BE - sorry not sorry, GOP), all votes will be counted by Tuesday evening and then we'll know what's what, muthafuckaaas...

 

The Soup Nazi 08.04.2020 09:55 AM


Trump doubles down on well-wishes for alleged sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell

The president’s remarks come after he drew criticism for his initial reaction to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime companion.

:fuckyou:

!@#$%! 08.04.2020 12:06 PM

hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

https://youtu.be/zaaTZkqsaxY

wow... just wow....

h8kurdt 08.04.2020 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

https://youtu.be/zaaTZkqsaxY

wow... just wow....


I just wanted to hear the curb theme tune before the interview starts. Certainly wouldn't have been out of place.

EVOLghost 08.04.2020 01:26 PM

Just finished watching. Guhhhhhhh.....dude just strokin’ his egowhile hijacking the interview. I honestly don’t know how people believe he was/is able to lead a country.

tw2113 08.04.2020 09:49 PM

Some legit just wanted a non politician POTUS

The Soup Nazi 08.04.2020 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw2113
Some legit just wanted a non politician POTUS


"I voted for him because he wasn't a politician" was one of the top answers when Trump voters were asked DUDE, WHAT IN ALL THAT IS FUCK WERE YOU THINKING.

!@#$%! 08.04.2020 10:52 PM

Trump’s name should live in infamy

Opinion by
George T. Conway III
Contributing columnist
August 3, 2020 at 3:47 PM EDT

If there’s one thing we know about President Trump, it’s that he lies and he cheats. Endlessly. And shamelessly. But still, mostly, incompetently.

So it should have come as no surprise that Trump finally went where no U.S. president had ever gone before. In a tweet last week, he actually suggested that the country “Delay the Election.”

That trial balloon was a brazen effort to see if he can defraud his way into four more years in the White House. And why not try? After all, Trump has managed to swindle his way through life, on matters large and small, essential and trivial.

He paid someone to take the SAT for him, according to his niece Mary L. Trump. (He denies it.) A prominent sportswriter wrote an entire book, titled “Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump,” on how Trump cheats at golf — golf! — through such methods as throwing opponents’ balls into bunkers, miscounting strokes and even declaring himself the winner of tournaments he didn’t play in.

Trump posed as a nonexistent publicist, so he could lie about his wealth and plant stories about his supposed sexual exploits, including one with actress Carla Bruni, who denied a tryst and called Trump “obviously a lunatic.” And his life has been littered with myriad alleged financial cons, including Trump University, which resulted in a $25 million settlement, though no admission of wrongdoing, and his “charitable” foundation, which regulators ordered be shut down.

His presidency has been of a piece. By The Post’s count, more than 20,000 falsehoods in 3½ years, on subjects ranging from his inaugural crowd size to the coronavirus, from conversations with foreign leaders to forecasts of a hurricane track. The untruths have accelerated, from five a day in early 2017 to nearly two dozen daily this year and last. With the coronavirus, his untruths have finally brought him down: No, concern about the virus wasn’t a “hoax.” No, the disease won’t just “disappear,” “like a miracle.” No, we’re not in a crisis because we’ve done so much testing. No, Trump hasn’t done a “great job” fighting the virus, and no, we’re not on the verge of a “tremendous victory” over it.

So finally, Trump’s credibility, such as it ever was, is shot — and his poll numbers with it. He stands on the verge of electoral oblivion. He’s capable of no response other than his lifelong mainstays: shamelessly lying and trying to cheat. He tried once before, of course, to cheat in this election, by using presidential powers to try to extort Ukraine into propagating lies about his opponent — and was caught, although not punished.

Now he peddles a different lie: that somehow extensive “Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good)” would produce “the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history.” Hence the supposed need to “Delay the Election.”

All untrue, of course. Voting by mail has a long, venerable tradition in this country, most notably the election of 1864, when 150,000 Union soldiers sent in ballots that helped ensure President Abraham Lincoln’s reelection, the preservation of the union and the abolition of slavery. Mailed votes leave a paper trail that renders them less, not more, susceptible to fraud. The fraud is Trump’s: He’s lying so he can buy more time — or so he can delegitimize the vote and blame someone other than himself for his defeat.

But Trump is apparently too inept, ignorant, desperate or deluded — probably all four — to realize or care: His suggestion is absurd. The electoral calendar is set in stone, by law. Title 3 of the U.S. Code makes clear that the election must be held on Nov. 3, that members of the electoral college must meet and vote on Dec. 14, and that their votes must be counted before a joint session of the new Congress on Jan. 6 at 1 p.m. sharp. And the 20th Amendment provides that, no matter what, Trump’s current term ends at precisely noon on Jan. 20, and that if no president has been elected, another provision of Title 3 would confer the presidency’s powers on … the speaker of the House.

Even the worst of Trump’s enablers in Congress dismissed out of hand the idea of delaying the election. But Trump’s suggestion was more than just imbecilic. Steven G. Calabresi, a law professor who was a founder of the Federalist Society, a conservative lawyers’ group of which I’ve long been a member (and a member of its visiting board), nailed it: Trump’s suggestion was “fascistic.” It was the ploy of a would-be dictator, albeit an inept one.

Calabresi added that Trump should be impeached and removed for his tweet, and if Trump ever acted on it, and were there time, I’d agree. Trump should have been removed already twice over, for obstructing the Russia investigation and extorting Ukraine. His effort to sabotage a democratic system he swore to protect only confirms his unfitness for the job. But it’s too late for impeachment now.

Trump’s sanction must come at the polls, and beyond. For the sake of our constitutional republic, he must lose, and lose badly. Yet that should be just a start: We should only honor former presidents who uphold and sustain our nation’s enduring democratic values. There should be no schools, bridges or statues devoted to Trump. His name should live in infamy, and he should be remembered, if at all, for precisely what he was — not a president, but a blundering cheat.

_tunic_ 08.05.2020 05:11 AM

Neil Young Sues Donald Trump Campaign Over Unauthorized Use of His Music

The full Complaint papers are on his NY Archives site




 

Diesel 08.05.2020 05:23 AM

 

The Soup Nazi 08.05.2020 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel

 


You know I'm a sucker for a good Smiths reference. :)

h8kurdt 08.06.2020 09:33 AM

Quote:

Republican Military Veterans Turn On Trump In New Attack Ad Airing On Fox News
These veterans say they're done with Trump.
By Ed Mazza, HuffPost US

A new attack ad featuring Republicans who’ve served in the military will air on Fox News in the swing states during the Republican National Convention later this month.

But it’s not a celebration of President Donald Trump’s nomination.

These Republican veterans say they’re done with Trump ― and they’re planning to vote for Democrat Joe Biden in the new spot from Republican Voters Against Trump:


Republican Voters Against Trump, which highlights the voices of everyday members of the party who are disaffected with the president, says the spot will air on Fox News during the convention in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Arizona and Florida.


Trump won all of those states in 2016, which combine for 85 electoral votes, but Biden has an edge this year in all five, according to polls.

The new ad will also run on digital media outlets in the battleground states.

Republican Voters Against Trump is one of several anti-Trump groups hitting the president from the right.

Doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

Bytor Peltor 08.06.2020 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
this Wednesday, August 5th, Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee and it’s going to be epic......everyone have a great weekend!!!



For those of you who don’t C SPAN, yesterday Sally Yates testified from home, via zoom (I presume?), before the Senate Judiciary Committee where Chairman Graham treated her with respect! The questioning was tough, but Sally was a good democratic soldier continuously falling on Barak Obama’s sword......let’s take a look:

Remember when we were told that Carter Page was actively colluding with the Russians because the FISA court and the FBI told us so:
 

(Look at the date: July 21, 2018)

TRUMP tweet
“BIG NEWS! The Political Crime of the Century is unfolding. ObamaBiden illegally spied on the Trump Campaign, both before and after the election. Treason!”



Jonathan Turley
“Sally Yates just testified that she would not have signed off on the surveillance of Carter Page if she knew what she knows now. That follows Rod Rosenstein saying the same thing.”

“ ...Yates also confirmed that the Logan Act was raised in the meeting with President Obama on Flynn. Yet she stated that the concern was that the Trump national security adviser had undermined the Obama Administration by encouraging them not to retaliate.”

“Yates said that you could say that Comey "went rogue" in ordering the Flynn interview. Yates is struggling with the Logan Act issue since Flynn was speaking as the NS adviser who was coming into office in less than two weeks. Comey reportedly said the Flynn meeting was "legit."



"I was upset that Director Comey didn't coordinate that with us and acted unilaterally," Yates said.

"Did Comey go rogue?" Graham asked.

"You could use that term, yes," Yates agreed.


Yates said she also took issue with Comey for not telling her that Flynn's communications with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were being investigated and that she first learned about this from President Barack Obama during an Oval Office meeting. Yates said she was "irritated" with Comey for not telling her about this earlier.

That meeting, which took place on Jan. 5, 2017, was of great interest to Graham, who wanted to know why Obama knew about Flynn's conversations before she did. Graham and other Republicans have speculated that Obama wanted Flynn investigated for nefarious purposes. Yates claimed that this was not the case, and explained why Obama was aware of the calls at the time.




TRUMP tweet
“Sally Yates is either lying or grossly incompetent. It is not possible she could have known so little about Dirty Cop James Comey (and others) from her high position in the Department of “Justice”. The political Crime of the Century, and she had no idea what they were doing?”


Sally Yates watched Sean Spicer's press conference and contacted Comey about the Flynn-Kislyak calls......this doesn’t sound like someone going “rouge” to me, this reeks of agreed conspiracy regarding subject you’re about to go rouge about!

 


 




Paul Sperry tweet
“BREAKING NEWS: Durham and his team of investigators still have not interviewed central #Spygate suspect John Brennan or former top Obama Justice official Sally Yates, who cleared two of the fraudulent spy warrants on Trump adviser for submission to FISA court”

“Barr & Durham + Graham, Grassley & Johnson now have just 3 months (guaranteed) to get to the bottom of the biggest political scandal in American history, bar none, and to hold the guilty accountable. They have 3 months to make sure it's not also the biggest cover-up in US history”


It appears James Comey will testify on September 5th


 

h8kurdt 08.06.2020 11:27 AM

Nothing will happen.

Bytor Peltor 08.06.2020 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Nothing will happen.


You could be 100% correct......but it won’t take 2+ years and $30+ million dollars to find out!


 

!@#$%! 08.06.2020 12:47 PM

what dumbfuckery is cheese fry up to now?

Bytor Peltor 08.06.2020 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
May 15, 2020 (page 434)




Desperation = a state of despair, typically one which results in rash or extreme behavior

Federal Judge Hires High-Powered D.C. Attorney To Defend His Actions In The Flynn Case

Why would a Federal Judge need to defend his actions in a case?
(let this sink in)

Is Judge Sullivan ignorant regarding his authority?

Is Judge Sullivan just playing politics??

To recap, Judge Sullivan appointed a retired Judge John Gleason to prosecute General Flynn because the Department Of Justice wanted to drop the charges. The DOJ was admitting there was no legitimate reason for their initial investigation.

It appears to me that Judge Sullivan got caught up trying to use his Civil Authority in a criminal case......but it can’t be this simple, can it?

So the Writ Of Mandamus is granted by the circuit court (appeals court) and it requires Judge Sullivan to explain his decision of appointing outside council. Also, Judge Sullivan must explain why as Judge of the case, he instructed the retired Judge John Gleason on how he should carry out his actions.

Now that Judge Sullivan has painted himself into a Judicial corner, and the circuit court is seeking answers......Judge Sullivan lawyers up???

A Federal Judge ”shouldn’t” need representation to respond to a Writ Of Mandamus......should he?

I’m guessing the conflicts are numerous! Also, obvious reasons why Judge Sullivan should have recused himself and didn't, therefore overstepping his authority in his handling of this case.




Mr. Schunk, PLEASE help shed some light on this......by hiring an attorney, is Judge Sullivan now saying he is a party to the case?

Can a Judge be a party to the case and still preside over the case?

Granted, Judge Sullivan did bring in retired Judge John Gleason, but by doing so, did Judge Sullivan relinquish his authority over the case?

Lastly, and this is hard to imagine and I (doubt?) it’s legal......but Judge Sullivan can’t seek outside council regarding how he should rule??????


Back on May 26, 2020 I asked if Judge Sullivan was claiming to be a party to the case? I specifically asked if a Judge can be a party to the case while presiding over it?

On May 28, 2020, Mr. Schunk responded:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
He's not saying he's a party to the case, as he certainly cannot become a party to a case over which he is presiding as judge. He might simply be expecting to be investigated (by the Senate Judiciary Committee, perhaps), or some other action besides the Michael Flynn case, such as a complaint to the District Bar. And he certainly did not relinquish control over the case by bringing Judge Gleason into the picture, as Sullivan would only relinquish his authority by recusing himself. As to his bringing in outside legal counsel regarding how he should rule, that's something I've never heard of, and I'm not sure of its legality.



“The presiding judge in the case of former national-security adviser Michael Flynn refused to dismiss the case on Thursday, even after a federal appeals court ordered the judge to do so.

U.S. District Court judge Emmet Sullivan issued a petition for an “en banc” hearing of the case before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. If accepted, the case would be reargued for all the judges on the appeals court.”


 



Appeals court tells parties in Flynn case to be ready for questions on judicial impartiality (August 5, 2020)

“The order, which indicated that one court may be planning to question the impartiality of a judge on another court, is the latest twist in the years-long legal saga.“

“Then Wednesday, ahead of the Aug. 11 rehearing before 10 of the 11 judges on the circuit, the court issued the order asking that for parties in the case to be prepared for oral arguments related to two federal laws that outline the circumstances of when a federal judge should recuse themselves from a legal proceeding.”

Mr. Schunk, I’m confused : )

By the court issuing the order asking the “parties in the case” to be prepared for oral arguments......is the Court now recognizing Judge Sullivan as a party to the case? And if so, regarding your assessment on May 28, 2020, has Jusge Sullivan relinquished his authority?

!@#$%! 08.06.2020 03:41 PM

i unignored his post and he’s talking to himself lmfao

poor cheesefry

Bytor Peltor 08.06.2020 08:16 PM

Steve Scalise tweet

“Today @realDonaldTrump signed an executive order directing the U.S. government to buy essential medicine from AMERICAN companies.

Big step in bringing our medical supply chain back home.

No more depending on other countries—like Communist China—for life-saving medication.”

choc e-Claire 08.06.2020 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Communist China

:D

Also, hope you're not a gamer - it's likely now illegal to buy anything in League of Legends, Clash of Clans, Fortnite, or even anything Activision have made. Thanks, Donald!

The Soup Nazi 08.06.2020 11:06 PM

Quote:

New York attorney general seeks to dissolve NRA in suit accusing gun rights group of wide-ranging fraud and self-dealing

In a civil suit filed Wednesday, New York Attorney General Letitia James alleges that CEO Wayne LaPierre and other top leaders drained $64 million from the nonprofit in three years.

NOICE. :cool:

Bytor Peltor 08.06.2020 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by choc e-Claire
:D

Also, hope you're not a gamer - it's likely now illegal to buy anything in League of Legends, Clash of Clans, Fortnite, or even anything Activision have made. Thanks, Donald!


I’m not a gamer nor a til-tok’er!

Trump Signs Executive Order That Will Effectively Ban Use Of TikTok In the U.S.

The Soup Nazi 08.06.2020 11:23 PM

Y'know, you two fuckers are not just wrong, you're fuckin' boring. That's even worse.

h8kurdt 08.07.2020 07:30 AM

Thighland


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth