Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination? (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=113183)

!@#$%! 09.25.2020 07:51 PM

i personally think bloomberg cares that this country doesn’t end up destroyed at the hands of a degenerate and his stupid followers, and won’t run again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Soup Nazi 09.25.2020 08:20 PM

 


^ That's Doomsday, you follow.

Trump could stay in power even if he doesn’t win the election. The Constitution allows it.

Opinion by Fareed Zakaria
Columnist
September 24, 2020 at 6:25 p.m. GMT-3


By declining to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, President Trump has agitated many who fear he will refuse to leave office even if he loses the November election — and may even resort to violence. The terrifying reality is that there are also several mechanisms that are legal and constitutional that could enable Trump to stay in office without actually winning the vote.

The system of electing the president is complicated because it was not designed to be directly democratic. The Constitution calls for states to choose the presidential electors, who in turn gather to vote for the president. Over time, states have passed laws that ensured their state’s popular vote for the presidency would determine the electors. But those are laws, not a constitutional obligation.

Now, imagine the scenario during election week: Trump is leading on Nov. 3, but Democratic nominee Joe Biden gains ground in the days following. Republicans file objections to tens of thousands of mail-in ballots. Democrats file countersuits. Taking account of the confusion, legislatures decide to choose the electors themselves.

Here’s the worry. Of the nine swing states, eight have Republican legislatures. If one or more decide that balloting is chaotic and marred by irregularities, they could send what they regard as the legitimate slate of electors, which would be Republican.

Democrats may object and file lawsuits. In some of those states, Democratic governors or secretaries of state could send their own slates of electors to Washington. That would add to the confusion, but that might well be part of the Republican plan. When Congress convenes on Jan. 6 to tally the electors’ votes, there would be challenges to the legitimacy of some electors. Congressional Republicans would agree that disputed states should not be counted. That would ensure that neither candidate would get to 270 electoral votes.

At that point, the Constitution directs that the House of Representatives vote to determine the presidential election. But it does so with each state casting a single vote. If the current numbers hold, there would be 26 state delegations that are Republican and 23 Democratic (with one tied), so the outcome would be to reelect Trump. Trump does not need to do anything other than accept this outcome, which is constitutional. (Hat tip to Tom Rogers and Tim Wirth for their writings on this topic.)

Trump clearly understands this chain of events. He has been casting doubt on mail-in ballots for months, insisting that the results must be the ones that reflect the tally on election night. He said this week that without mail-in ballots, there would be no worries about a transfer of power because there would simply be a continuation of his rule. He has also acknowledged that “at a certain point, it goes to Congress.”

For this scenario to play out, state Republican parties have to put their desire to win above concerns that all voices are heard. Unfortunately, recent history suggests that most will readily make this trade.

Many state Republican parties have been actively attempting to suppress votes. Just a few examples: In 2011, Texas passed a law requiring a government ID for voting, and allowed gun licenses but not student IDs from state universities. Ostensibly, this was to prevent voter fraud, which several studies have shown is largely nonexistent. In 2017, Georgia passed a law blocking voter registrations with minor typos, which mainly affected Black voters. In Florida, the Republican governor and legislature have effectively gutted a state initiative that restored voting rights to more than 1 million former felons, disproportionately Black.

American democracy is getting warped because the Republican Party believes its path to power lies not in getting a majority of the votes but through other means. In 2018, thanks to redistricting, Republicans in Wisconsin, having won about 45 percent of the vote, ended up with almost 65 percent of the seats in the state assembly. They have become used to this kind of situation on the national stage. Since 1992, the Republican presidential candidate has won the popular vote only once — in 2004, in the wake of the country’s worst terrorist attack and with a wartime “rally around the flag” sentiment. Nevertheless, Republicans have held the White House for almost half of those 28 years.

The United States prides itself as the world’s leading democracy. And yet, because of a vague and creaky constitutional process and ferocious partisanship, this November we might put on a display of democratic dysfunction that would rival any banana republic on the planet.

Skuj 09.27.2020 04:55 PM

NYT Trump Tax Return headline!!! Make popcorn. Watch Bytor and Schunk ignore it. "But her emails."

The Soup Nazi 09.27.2020 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
NYT Trump Tax Return headline!!! Make popcorn. Watch Bytor and Schunk ignore it. "But her emails."


"I alone can fix it."

Bytor Peltor 09.27.2020 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
NYT Trump Tax Return headline!!! Make popcorn. Watch Bytor and Schunk ignore it. "But her emails."


October 7, 2019 (page 381)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
YES - candidate Trump repeatedly said he would release his Taxes. President Trump has refused to do so. I’m sure this leaves a bad taste in the mouths of some, but it’s NOT A BIG DEAL for the majority who voted for him. Remember, Presidents are not required to release their taxes.

While you’re busy wasting time being galled, have you ever considered this? If private citizen / businessman Donald Trump truly didn’t pay taxes, why didn’t Barack Hussein Obama’s IRS ever audit and bring charges? Hell, it’s how they got Al Capone!

But seriously......Ford, Reagan, Bush-Clinton-Bush, Obama......surely one of these Presidencies would have taken action if taxes weren’t being paid??? You see, there are all sorts of Federally protected ways to handle and use money in such a way to avoid paying taxes or at the very least, to minimize the amount paid. Most of your Billionaires and CEO’s of major companies do this all the time and it’s 100% legal!

Personally, I wish the IRS laws were changed to where big business and Billionaires would be required to pay a more honest tax......but the laws haven’t been changed and so the loopholes will continue to be used.

Before tackling taxes, how about a balanced budget?

Also, DRUDGE has this interesting story this morning.

So you want me to say or call out negative things about our President. Is there something else in the courts that I’m not aware of??? Is another investigation going on???

While I think candidate Trump was masterful at using Twitter to get his message out during the election, often times I wish President Trump would lock his twitter up! I don’t believe he needs to respond to every single thing......but I do see how he can easily turn the tables on such Anti-Trump media reporting.


So skuJ returns with his third post since May.

My stance regarding Trump’s taxes are no different today than they were October last year. If tax fraud or evasion was committed, it was done so under the Obama, Bush and (perhaps) Clinton presidencies??? Nothing was deemed illegal during their terms as President! Most importantly, Presidents aren’t required to release their taxes so I’m unsure if anything can be done with this leaked information???

Lastly, it’s my understanding a BIG BIG BIG story will drop later this week regarding The Clinton’s : )

Will Joe show up at the debate Tuesday?

Former FBI Director Comey to Testify Wednesday

“Mr. Mueller has declined the committee’s invitation to appear to explain his report. He says he doesn’t have enough time to prepare. But I’m going to ask the Department of Justice and Inspector General Horowitz to look at this report that members of Mr. Mueller’s team erased information from their devices.”

 

The Soup Nazi 09.27.2020 08:11 PM

^ As a courtesy to Symbols I won't quote you. But I have one last question for your sorry ass: Forget legal technicalities, WHERE ARE YOUR FUCKING VALUES YOU DISGUSTING PIECE OF SHIT.

Bytor Peltor 09.27.2020 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
^ As a courtesy to Symbols I won't quote you. But I have one last question for your sorry ass: Forget legal technicalities, WHERE ARE YOUR FUCKING VALUES YOU DISGUSTING PIECE OF SHIT.


Charlie Kirk tweet
“I’m far more interested in the tax returns of a politician who became a multimillionaire than the tax returns of a billionaire who became a politician.”


In 2016 the Biden’s earned roughly $400k

......in 2017-18, the Biden’s earned more than $16.5 million

the TRUTH about “values” is coming!!!

 


 


 

Bytor Peltor 09.27.2020 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
WHERE ARE YOUR FUCKING VALUES


I guess Soup doesn’t exercise “values” in other threads?

Charlie Kirk tweet

“Can you imagine if the New York Times found $3.5 million in Trump’s tax returns from the wife of the Mayor of Moscow and that that money went to pay prostitutes connected to a human trafficking ring

They would lose their minds!

So why are they ignoring Hunter Biden?”

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
It’s Not A Conflict Of Interest??????

James Woods tweet
“Putin and the woman who sent 3.5 million dollars to #HunterBiden, while his father #JoeBiden was Vice-President of the United States. Follow the stench of filthy money and it leads to a #DirtyBiden every time...”

 


Has anyone seen.....? Human trafficking.....??
 


Bytor Peltor 09.27.2020 10:04 PM

 

h8kurdt 09.27.2020 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
 


Then show us to prove otherwise and we'll shut up about it.

Bytor Peltor 09.28.2020 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Then show us to prove otherwise and we'll shut up about it.


It doesn’t work that way! As I’ve stated, President's aren’t required to release their taxes......it’s the law! Congress could have changed the rules at anytime during our lifetimes, but they haven’t and who knows if they ever will? As I’ve stated before in this thread, I wouldn’t mind seeing where an individual must release their taxes before officially becoming a presidential candidate.

It’s sad that you think anyone would want you to “shut up about it.” Just like the Mueller investigation, impeachment and the General Flynn investigation, Trumps taxes are probably another dead end......so bitch and moan all you want and I’ll continue to enjoy my popcorn.

!@#$%! 09.28.2020 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
^ As a courtesy to Symbols

and the rest of the universe! :)

thank you

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Then show us to prove otherwise and we'll shut up about it.

damn dude, my eyes.

you don’t realize you’re an unwitting henchman, do you? :D

Bytor Peltor 09.28.2020 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
you don’t realize you’re an unwitting henchman, do you? :D


All of you free minded freethinkers are just opportunities for TRUTH!!!

 



Do you see what I see? Can free minded freethinkers comprehend??

Trump PAID, as in transferred to the US Treasury, $1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2017. Note also that most of the overpayment was rolled forward, not refunded. The $750 figure is an ADDITIONAL $750.

Also, one must consider that President Trump has donated each of his yearly Presidential checks to charity (what was soup saying about values?). That’s roughly $1.2 million over three years......how much of a credit/write off does one receive for $1.2 million in donations???


I wonder how much of that $16+ million the Biden’s donated to charity?

!@#$%! 09.28.2020 10:12 AM

is he talking to himself again now?

EVOLghost 09.28.2020 03:54 PM

lol Trump contributes absolute nothing to American society.

Bytor Peltor 09.29.2020 03:14 PM

May 18, 2018 (page 202)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Symbols, I admire your willingness to wait, it’s all we can do.

All I’m pointing out is so far there is no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded.

Evidently Congress has information that Russia colluded with someone?? Guess what, they probably did.

The question is, who???

President Obama

Hillary Clinton or her campaign


Anyone else??????

All we know so far is there is not one single shred of evidence linking President Trump or his campaign.

****BREAKING NEWS****

Once Congress reveals who colluded—GUESS WHAT—there is no evidence that it had any impact on the election or that Donald Trump won because of it.

Last but not least, as I’ve stated previously in this thread......from my meager understanding of the law......colluding isn’t a crime.

Everyone have a great weekend!




May 18, 2018 (page 203)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
And so it goes....on and on and on and on.....in circles.

If Mueller does end his investigation with charges of collusion, I don't know how in the fuck Peltor and millions of others are going to comprehend it. Symbols said it best a few posts ago. We are in the age of Alternative Facts.



May 18, 2018 (page 203)......h8kurdt’s eyes must be sewn shut!
Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
So the fact the Mueller has so far charged 19 people and 3 companies is nothing. 3 people have also pleaded guilty relating to the investigation.

Of course there's nothing going on. He's got nothing at all. If you honestly believe Trump knew NOTHING about what was going on you're deluded.

C'mon man, open your eyes and ears.



May 20, 2018 (page 203)......tesla knew!
Quote:

Originally Posted by tesla69
Yet others noted that the FBI's Russia "investigation" into Trump didn't seem to extend to Hillary Clinton. We would remind readers that her campaign chair, John Podesta, sat on the board of Massachusetts energy company Joule Unlimited, along with senior Russian official Anatoly Chubais and Russian oligarch Ruben Vardanyan – who was appointed by Vladimir Putin to the Russian economic council.
Two months after Podesta joined the board, Joule managed to raise $35 million from Putin’s Kremlin-backed investment fund Rusnano. Podesta transferred 75,000 shares of Joule to his daughter through a shell company using her address.


May 20, 2018 (page 203)......the poo slinger wallows in madness!
Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
don’t you dare challenge madness with logic, you soroastrian agent of interplanetary reptilio-fascism

 



Donald Trump Jr. tweet

OMG—JUST DECLASSIFIED:
The Russia hoax was Hillary’s plan, and the Obama-Biden White House was briefed on it.

 

Bytor Peltor 09.29.2020 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Evidently Congress has information that Russia colluded with someone?? Guess what, they probably did.

The question is, who???

President Obama

Hillary Clinton or her campaign

Anyone else??????

All we know so far is there is not one single shred of evidence linking President Trump or his campaign.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Donald Trump Jr. tweet

OMG—JUST DECLASSIFIED:
The Russia hoax was Hillary’s plan, and the Obama-Biden White House was briefed on it.

 



September 7, 2016 - U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strozk regarding “U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server.


May 20, 2018 (page 203)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
It's so obvious now where this whole thing is going to end up. Even Ray Charles can see where this is going. The recent headlines and tweet-storms say it all.


1. The Mueller report will be very bad news for Trump.

2. But, Team Trump will say that it was all Obama's fault, because he directed the FBI to set this all up for political reasons.


We can end this whole debate right now, because that is exactly what is going to happen.

I shall bump this post when it happens.


PS. I forgot point 3......

3. Millions upon millions of Trumpists will buy this explanation, hook, line and sinker.


June 20, 2018 (page 212)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
So, I see we are still talking about Clinton's fucking emails?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
"But her emails". :)



November 6, 2018 (page 261)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
RUSH LIMBAUGH UNLEASHED:

- "Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia."
- "Hillary Clinton rigged that election.”
- Joe Biden “can’t fill a phone booth” on the campaign trail
- Bill Clinton, Obama envious & jealous of Trump's crowds



Charlie Kirk tweet

BREAKING:

According to recently declassified intel reports—John Brennan briefed Obama and others about “approval by Hillary Clinton” on a plan to vilify Donald Trump by tying him to Russia & Putin

Obama knew.

This was a hoax from the beginning—where are the indictments?

tw2113 09.29.2020 10:55 PM

Shit...we have 2 more clusterfucks to sit through?

The Soup Nazi 09.29.2020 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw2113
Shit...we have 2 more clusterfucks to sit through?


Fine by me if Biden makes the Dotard lose it again.

This is nothing. (And stop making false equivalences.) Worry about the election.

The Soup Nazi 09.30.2020 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

Fine by me if Biden makes the Dotard lose it again.

This is nothing. (And stop making false equivalences.) Worry about the election.


And when I say worry about the election, I mean WORRY about THIS.

Quote:

Jim Thienel, 73, of Waterford, Mich., said that in his view, fraud was inevitable and Mr. Trump was simply refusing to accept any election tainted by it.

“I think what Trump is really saying is that if the election is filled with fraud, which I believe it’s going to be, do you walk out on your role as the president of the United States simply because the Democrats cheated?” said Mr. Thienel, who runs an appliance repair shop.

[...]

Mr. Thienel said that his years as a poll watcher in Detroit convinced him that voter fraud would be widespread this year. “I think it’s far more likely that Democrats will cheat with the absentee and mail-in ballots. I strongly believe that there is nothing the Democrats wouldn’t do to win,” he said.

Like many of Mr. Trump’s supporters, Mr. Thienel was more concerned with the prospect of violence instigated by opponents of the president if he wins.

“I just spent three and a half hours in gun training today because I’m concerned,” he said.

Trump:

Quote:

Proud Boys: Stand back, stand by.

ETA: The motherfuckers have already added president Apocalypse Fuckface's message to them to their logo.

 

Bytor Peltor 09.30.2020 03:12 AM

December 2, 2018 (page 276)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Comey Strikes Deal Regarding Congressional Testimony......to face questions about his handling of the Clinton email and Trump-Russia collusion investigations.


......someone please tell Skuj about the Clinton emails


September 27, 2020 (page 464)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
Lastly, it’s my understanding a BIG BIG BIG story will drop later this week regarding The Clinton’s : )

Former FBI Director Comey to Testify Wednesday


T-minus six hours until Comey testifies again, this time with the newly unclassified report that Crooked Hillary was the mastermind behind Russian collusion......will anyone be watching?


Chad Pergram tweet
“Fmr FBI Dir Comey goes before Senate Judiciary Cmte today to answer questions about Crossfire Hurricane probe/FISA warrants“

_tunic_ 09.30.2020 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
President Trump is hardly responsible for any interpretations which groups unrelated to his campaign may apply to his statements.

What the fuck!?
He is your President
He is responsible
He should take action against it, not just say that he opposes, but act as such

!@#$%! 09.30.2020 07:12 AM

but a toddler can’t be held responsible for anything! :D

Antagon 09.30.2020 10:29 AM

Man, this is not looking good. It was Biden versus a belligerent buffoon who didn't even care to hide his buffoonery anymore, safe for unconvincingly stating his disinfectant injection comment earlier this year had been "sarcastic". Trump didn't do himself any favors with this lack of a performance. But that's actually what worries me. In line with what Soup Nazi stated above: The dotard has hinted time and time again at the possibility, that he may not accept the results of the election if they are not in his favor. There's this sinking feeling that what the world witnessed yesterday was a man who doesn't care anymore. Why would he have no reason to care? Possibly because he seems to think he won't leave office no matter what? I mean, this shit was worrying way way before yesterday's pathetic display. But it certainly seemed to put a definite stamp on all the worries that have been festering over time. Shit, he ain't even dogwhistling anymore, all of his bigotry came with a humungous sign that said "Here, look at me, I'm out in the open". At this point, does it matter if Biden wipes the floor with him during the election, when there's a good chance Trump's gonna exploit a broken system to his advantage again? Frightening thought I tell ya, frightening thought.

demonrail666 09.30.2020 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antagon
Man, this is not looking good. It was Biden versus a belligerent buffoon who didn't even care to hide his buffoonery anymore, safe for unconvincingly stating his disinfectant injection comment earlier this year had been "sarcastic". Trump didn't do himself any favors with this lack of a performance. But that's actually what worries me. In line with what Soup Nazi stated above: The dotard has hinted time and time again at the possibility, that he may not accept the results of the election if they are not in his favor. There's this sinking feeling that what the world witnessed yesterday was a man who doesn't care anymore. Why would he have no reason to care? Possibly because he seems to think he won't leave office no matter what? I mean, this shit was worrying way way before yesterday's pathetic display. But it certainly seemed to put a definite stamp on all the worries that have been festering over time. Shit, he ain't even dogwhistling anymore, all of his bigotry came with a humungous sign that said "Here, look at me, I'm out in the open". At this point, does it matter if Biden wipes the floor with him during the election, when there's a good chance Trump's gonna exploit a broken system to his advantage again? Frightening thought I tell ya, frightening thought.


I'd forgotten how bad Trump is in these kinds of situations. But I was quickly reminded how, as terrible as he was overall in those debates with Hillary, where, even as I became increasingly unsympathetic towards her, his only real stand out moment (albeit a massive one) was his, "because you'd be in jail" line. There was nothing as perfectly timed or delivered as that last night. But more than that, I thinkTrump's real problem is that while people may question lots of things about Biden, they don't instinctively dislike him the way so many did when it came to Hillary. I actually thought Biden did really well last night: keeping his head and never succumbing to the gaffes many expected (hopefully from Trump's side, fearfully on the side of the Dems). He was the level-headed centrist throughout and definitely forced Trump to go on the defensive.

While I suspect that neither would have converted anyone already set on their support for one or the other I'd definitely give this round to Biden. Trump's strongest moment IMO was where he called out antifa, but that isn't something I'd see Biden as being synonymous with. His blows there would've landed far harder had they been aimed at someone like AOC or Ilhanan Omar but nobody realistically equates Biden (or Kamala Harris for that matter) with any kind of far Left stormtrooper organisation. This even made Trump's attack on Biden's position on law and order (who history tells us is far from 'progressive') fall flat, especially with Biden himself killing it outright with his support of it and denunciation of the whole 'defund the police' thing. In the end, his best line of attack from Trump was that Biden simply hadn't achieved much during all his years in politics. True, maybe .... maybe ... but hardly a mic drop.

I want Trump to win but I think Biden may, in spite of my early thoughts, be his absolutely worst kind of opponent. Not because I think he's an especially strong candidate but, on the contrary, because he's actually such a mediocre one who forces the spotlight onto Trump and his evident weaknesses. Trump would've been far more affective against a more divisive figure like Kamala Harris, but Biden, at worst, just seems like the slightly embarassing grandad who you send to bed before they really start to get out of hand. And we all have a soft for those, even when they're serving as a distraction from something far worse.

!@#$%! 09.30.2020 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
I want Trump to win

why do you wish us dead??

h8kurdt 09.30.2020 02:03 PM

Mate...

Actually doubly glad Everton are beating West Ham right now.

!@#$%! 09.30.2020 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h8kurdt
Mate...

Actually doubly glad Everton are beating West Ham right now.


3-1! i'm a new fan lmao

The Soup Nazi 09.30.2020 05:28 PM


Unless I'm missing a very weak attempt at sarcasm, this post needs to go. Disgusting horseshit is not a "differing opinion".

The Soup Nazi 09.30.2020 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antagon
In line with what Soup Nazi stated above: The dotard has hinted time and time again at the possibility, that he may not accept the results of the election if they are not in his favor. There's this sinking feeling that what the world witnessed yesterday was a man who doesn't care anymore. Why would he have no reason to care? Possibly because he seems to think he won't leave office no matter what? I mean, this shit was worrying way way before yesterday's pathetic display. But it certainly seemed to put a definite stamp on all the worries that have been festering over time. Shit, he ain't even dogwhistling anymore, all of his bigotry came with a humungous sign that said "Here, look at me, I'm out in the open". At this point, does it matter if Biden wipes the floor with him during the election, when there's a good chance Trump's gonna exploit a broken system to his advantage again? Frightening thought I tell ya, frightening thought.



Opinion piece by Tom Friedman in The New York Times:

Quote:

Trump Sent a Warning. Let’s Take It Seriously.

Our democracy is in terrible danger — more than since the Civil War, more than after Pearl Harbor, more than during the Cuban missile crisis.


President Trump has made it unmistakably clear in recent weeks — and even more crystal clear at the Tuesday debate —that there are only two choices before voters on Nov. 3 — and electing Joe Biden is not one of them.

The president has told us in innumerable ways that either he will be re-elected or he will delegitimize the vote by claiming that all mail-in ballots — a time-honored tradition that has ushered Republicans and Democrats into office and has been used by Trump himself — are invalid.

Trump’s motives could not be more transparent. If he does not win the Electoral College, he’ll muddy the results so that the outcome can be decided only by the Supreme Court or the House of Representatives (where each state delegation gets one vote). Trump has advantages in both right now, which he has boasted about for the past week.

I can’t say this any more clearly: Our democracy is in terrible danger — more danger than it has been since the Civil War, more danger than after Pearl Harbor, more danger than during the Cuban missile crisis and more danger than during Watergate.

I began my career as a foreign correspondent covering Lebanon’s second civil war, and it left a huge impact on me. I saw what happens in a country when everything becomes politics, when a critical mass of politicians put party before country, when responsible people, or seemingly responsible people, think that they can bend or break the rules — and go all the way — and that the system won’t break.

But when extremists go all the way, and moderates just go away, the system can break. And it will break. I saw it happen.

I would like to think that such a thing could not happen in America. I’d like to think that … but I am very, very worried.

I worry because Facebook and Twitter have become giant engines for destroying the two pillars of our democracy — truth and trust. Yes, these social networks have given voice to the voiceless. That is a good thing and it can really enhance transparency. But they have also become huge, unedited cesspools of conspiracy theories that are circulated and believed by a shocking — and growing — number of people.

These social networks are destroying our nation’s cognitive immunity — its ability to sort truth from falsehood.

Without shared facts on which to make decisions, there can be no solutions to our biggest challenges. And without a modicum of trust that both sides want to preserve and enhance the common good, it is impossible to accomplish anything big.

“Politics needs a reference point outside of politics,’’ argues the Hebrew University religious philosopher Moshe Halbertal. “It needs values, it needs facts and it needs leaders who respect that there is a sacred domain of decisions that will never be used to promote political gain, only the common good.’’

Public trust is eroded, added Halbertal, when people feel that this notion of the common good doesn’t exist because everything has become politics. That describes the United States today. The institutions we have relied upon to be outside the game of politics so as to adjudicate what is right and true — scientists, certain news media, the courts — have become so ensnared by politics that fewer and fewer of them are universally trusted to define and pursue the common good. Even mask-wearing has become partisan.

You cannot sustain a healthy democracy under such conditions.

And that is why the only choice in this election is Joe Biden. The Democrats are not blameless when it comes to playing politics, but there is no equivalence to the Republicans. The Democratic Party sorted through all the choices, and, led by older Black men and women in South Carolina, rejected the Democratic socialist candidate and said they wanted a moderate unifier named Joe Biden.

The Republicans — who in the past voted for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, sane conservatives who could be counted upon to uphold the common good — have done no such equivalent thing. They have fallen in line lock step behind a man who is the most dishonest, dangerous, meanspirited, divisive and corrupt person to ever occupy the Oval Office. And they know it. Four more years of Trump’s divide and rule will destroy our institutions and rip the country apart.

To me, the only hope for America is to elect Biden and split the G.O.P. between the Trumpists and whatever is left of the moderate Republicans, and then hope that a big center-left and small center-right can agree on enough things to propel the country forward, heal the divide and act together for the common good.

Admittedly, Biden did not particularly shine in tonight’s debate. Alas, I have never seen him shine in any debate. But I have no doubt that the people, values and integrity he would bring into government would be of a quality that the nation deserves.

If Trump’s monstrous performance left you feeling that you want four more years of his presidency — that he will respect the outcome of the election if it goes against him, that he will reunite the country, that he will do the presidency proud and surround himself with people of the quality that the country deserves — then you and I were watching different debates.

To get back a semblance of unity and sanity, Biden has to win. And that is why I have only one answer to every question now: Vote for Biden — do it by mail early if you must, but if you can, please, put on a mask and do it in person. If enough of us do that, Biden can win outright with the votes cast on Election Day, instead of waiting for all the mail-in ballots to be counted, thereby giving time for Trump and Fox News to muddy the outcome.

So help register someone to vote for Joe Biden. Phone bank for Joe Biden. Talk to your neighbor about Joe Biden. Volunteer for Joe Biden. Drive someone to the polls to vote for Joe Biden.

Do it as if your country’s democracy depends on it, because it does.

The Soup Nazi 09.30.2020 06:45 PM

Quote:

Chris Wallace Calls Debate ‘a Terrible Missed Opportunity’

The veteran anchor conceded he was initially “reluctant” to step in during the Trump-Biden matchup. “I’ve never been through anything like this,” he said.

“I never dreamt that it would go off the tracks the way it did."

Really? Have you not watched the fuckin' news over the past five years, Chris? What a mook.

Nevermind 09.30.2020 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
Unless I'm missing a very weak attempt at sarcasm, this post needs to go. Disgusting horseshit is not a "differing opinion".


admit Hillary's book is fucking creepy, at the very least

The Soup Nazi 09.30.2020 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevermind
admit Hillary's book is fucking creepy, at the very least


So no sarcasm. Oh, Hillary is creepy? Go post pictures of female genitalia on Parler and get the hell out of here forever, dickhead.

 

choc e-Claire 10.01.2020 12:17 AM

Two questions: where, and why?

demonrail666 10.01.2020 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
Unless I'm missing a very weak attempt at sarcasm, this post needs to go. Disgusting horseshit is not a "differing opinion".


You're starting to sound like some kind of cult member. You obviously hate Trump but getting triggered like this when someone hints at weird goings on within the Washington elite makes no sense to me. In a choice between Stalin and Hitler I'd probably go Stalin. I wouldn't deny the existence of gulags though.

h8kurdt 10.01.2020 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
You're starting to sound like some kind of cult member. You obviously hate Trump but getting triggered like this when someone hints at weird goings on within the Washington elite makes no sense to me. In a choice between Stalin and Hitler I'd probably go Stalin. I wouldn't deny the existence of gulags though.


Almost like...qanon?

Given that there's been zero solid evidence of "weird goings on" I'll err on the side of caution.

The Soup Nazi 10.01.2020 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
You're starting to sound like some kind of cult member. You obviously hate Trump but getting triggered like this when someone hints at weird goings on within the Washington elite makes no sense to me. In a choice between Stalin and Hitler I'd probably go Stalin. I wouldn't deny the existence of gulags though.


Rrriiiight, that's what's in front of us, a choice between Hitler and Stalin... "Weird goings on"... Christ on a stick, this place it's a bottomless pit sometimes.

!@#$%! 10.01.2020 08:54 AM

it’s sad to see old friends seduced by fascists. god fucking damn...

what am i doing on this board i almost don’t know anymore...

The Soup Nazi 10.01.2020 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
it’s sad to see old friends seduced by fascists. god fucking damn...

what am i doing on this board i almost don’t know anymore...


We're here because of Sonic Youth, a band that was, among many other great things, left-leaning and anti-fascist.

What the fuck are THEY doing here.

Antagon 10.01.2020 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
What the fuck are THEY doing here.



And what the fuck has been done to them? It never ceases to baffle me how someone who enjoys the music of a band that so obviously wears their collective hearts on their sleeves can turn into the followers of such vile demagogues. Just as much as it baffles me how "Women For Trump" is a thing.

Is it compartmentalization? Only caring about the sound and not the messages behind it? I mean, some are undoubtedly only here to troll and it stopped being about proper discourse amongst fans of a certain band a long time ago. With others, I'm not so sure this is their sole MO. But it is confounding to say the least.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth