Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Pick up lines that just don't work (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=2166)

SpectralJulianIsNotDead 05.24.2006 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acousticrock87
 


Apparently even the Dead Sea has more women than Pittsburgh...


ouch, that hurts

alyasa 05.24.2006 02:58 PM

What you gon' do with all that junk?
All that junk inside your trunk?
I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk,
Get you love drunk off my mumps.
My mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my mumps,
My mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my lovely little lumps. (Check it out)

I drive these brothers crazy,
I do it on the daily,
They treat me really nicely,
They buy me all these ices.
Dolce & Gabbana,
Fendi and NaDonna
Karan, they be sharin'
All their money got me wearin' fly
But I ain't askin,
They say they love my ass ‘n,
Seven Jeans, True Religion's,
I say no, but they keep givin'
So I keep on takin'
And no I ain't taken
We can keep on datin'
I keep on demonstrating.

acousticrock87 05.24.2006 03:03 PM

Someone played that song on the jukebox at a pool hall last night...I've lost all hope in pop culture.

Glice 05.24.2006 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alyasa
What you gon' do with all that junk?
All that junk inside your trunk?
I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk,
Get you love drunk off my mumps.
My mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my mumps,
My mumps, my mumps, my mumps, my lovely little lumps. (Check it out)

I drive these brothers crazy,
I do it on the daily,
They treat me really nicely,
They buy me all these ices.
Dolce & Gabbana,
Fendi and NaDonna
Karan, they be sharin'
All their money got me wearin' fly
But I ain't askin,
They say they love my ass ‘n,
Seven Jeans, True Religion's,
I say no, but they keep givin'
So I keep on takin'
And no I ain't taken
We can keep on datin'
I keep on demonstrating.


I love this song. I like old-school songs for the dancefloor. Dancefloor songs BEP do bestest.

I've said it before, and no amount of indie kids whining is going to change my opinion.

SpectralJulianIsNotDead 05.24.2006 03:19 PM

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I know a lot of whiny indie kids that like that song.

As I've said before, I don't like mainstream rap with the exception of outkast.

acousticrock87 05.24.2006 03:23 PM

I do understand that stuff being used for dances/clubs, and don't get me wrong, I have no problem with people liking it. I don't mean to diss the song itself or anyone that listens to it - I hate when people think everyone needs to have the same taste. It's just not for me. Especially while I'm trying to play pool.

qprogeny79 05.24.2006 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpectralJulianIsNotDead
Conservative college? All of those girls would probably hate me for my views on corporations and my some of my more communist leanings. Not to mention my thoughts about how the last good president was FDR and that progressivism died with him.


wow, we have diametrically opposite political leanings. laissez-faire all the way.

krastian 05.24.2006 03:28 PM

Ha ha....you do it to yourself, you do....and that's why it really hurts, you do it to yourself.:D

SpectralJulianIsNotDead 05.24.2006 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qprogeny79
wow, we have diametrically opposite political leanings. laissez-faire all the way.


I think there is a fine balance between laissez-faire and government regulation. If you have 100% laissez-faire- you get all kinds of dirty dealings, kickbacks, monopolistic practices, etc. If you have too much government regulation, you can hurt the profitibility of a business.

There are benefits and drawbacks to all political systems. Ultimately, in politics, I want to see people who understand this and understand balance in this imperfect world where idealism is foolishness.

It is like this in every aspect of government. If abortion was illegal, girls would attempt it themselves and die. It would be just like prohibition in this day and age.

The real question of politics is: what is the best we can do? I have no fricking clue even how to start answering that question, as most people do- because people either base their politics off of idealism or fear.

Trasher02 05.24.2006 03:51 PM

Let me put it down this way.
Every pick up line i've used hasn't worked. But you know this is offcourse the pick up line's fault pfuh yeah.

acousticrock87 05.24.2006 03:52 PM

Jeffery Wigand dominated Brown & Williamson without the government. It's not necessary to have the goverment deal with it, but it is safer. I'm for laissez-faire, but it's not perfect.

And I changed my mind, politics is a really bad pick up.

qprogeny79 05.24.2006 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpectralJulianIsNotDead
I think there is a fine balance between laissez-faire and government regulation. If you have 100% laissez-faire- you get all kinds of dirty dealings, kickbacks, monopolistic practices, etc. If you have too much government regulation, you can hurt the profitibility of a business.

There are benefits and drawbacks to all political systems. Ultimately, in politics, I want to see people who understand this and understand balance in this imperfect world where idealism is foolishness.

It is like this in every aspect of government. If abortion was illegal, girls would attempt it themselves and die. It would be just like prohibition in this day and age.

The real question of politics is: what is the best we can do? I have no fricking clue even how to start answering that question, as most people do- because people either base their politics off of idealism or fear.


without delving too far into politics yet again . . . coercive monopolies can only occur under a system that allows government regulation. one company might have a de facto monopoly under laissez-faire at any given time, but that does not preclude companies who make a better product or have a more effective marketing strategy from coming in and gaining market share even with a behemoth as competition. on the other hand, with the force of the government behind it a corporation can essentially do whatever it wants to bully competitors out of business -- all it would need to do is appeal to congress to, er, regulate its competitors out of any chance of profitability. and the only way it can do that is to pour a zillion dollars into congressional campaign funds . . . see below.

the only companies that would want government favors under laissez-faire are the ones that are having the shite beaten out of them by the competition. if we didn't allow that the mediocre companies would fail (as the market says they should) and we would be left only with the successful companies, who again would have no reason to pour funds into the coffers of politicos so long as they didn't negatively interfere with their affairs by . . . er, regulating their business.

so yeah, different strokes.

!@#$%! 05.24.2006 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qprogeny79
without delving too far into politics yet again . . . coercive monopolies can only occur under a system that allows government regulation. one company might have a de facto monopoly under laissez-faire at any given time, but that does not preclude companies who make a better product or have a more effective marketing strategy from coming in and gaining market share even with a behemoth as competition. on the other hand, with the force of the government behind it a corporation can essentially do whatever it wants to bully competitors out of business -- all it would need to do is appeal to congress to, er, regulate its competitors out of any chance of profitability. and the only way it can do that is to pour a zillion dollars into congressional campaign funds . . . see below.

the only companies that would want government favors under laissez-faire are the ones that are having the shite beaten out of them by the competition. if we didn't allow that the mediocre companies would fail (as the market says they should) and we would be left only with the successful companies, who again would have no reason to pour funds into the coffers of politicos so long as they didn't negatively interfere with their affairs by . . . er, regulating their business.

so yeah, different strokes.


hah, i bet you get TONS of chicks with that kind of talk :D

qprogeny79 05.24.2006 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
hah, i bet you get TONS of chicks with that kind of talk :D


more than you could ever imagine.

!@#$%! 05.24.2006 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qprogeny79
more than you could ever imagine.


 


she wants you

qprogeny79 05.24.2006 05:40 PM

ha. in all honesty, i do have to learn to be a tad more . . . superficial. it's a problem -- i care about people's ideals and dreams and aspirations and values and everything that makes them uniquely human, not what quantity of alcohol they had the previous night or what kind of dionysian debauchery is most conducive to their ephemeral pleasure. i think i scare the hell out of most people . . . except maybe bay buchanan or judy woodruff :rolleyes:.

!@#$%! 05.24.2006 05:41 PM

sorry. i was just picking on you for what you said about baltimore. :p

qprogeny79 05.24.2006 05:48 PM

no prob -- now go wrench your hands off in the zinc before you go in the ambalants to the hawspil in anarunnel. jeet? nojew? ok, i'll make you some aigs and wooder, or maybe we can go to litlitlee, but first i have to warsh up in the shar.

Kallisti23chaos 05.24.2006 05:51 PM

Are you here waiting for me ??**

terminal pharmacy 05.24.2006 06:00 PM

do you want a root?

do you mind laying down while I have one..... :-)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth