i thought nurse was their last great album and then a thousand leaves before that.

You're a bunch of sonic haters.
fuck fuck fuck.

bahaha.

nice parody reply.

it's not a parody reply.
i think that ALL sonic Lps range from good to excellicious to a certain extent.
And since you're here, although you do fookin' rule, i hate it when you say an LP is "decent". What the fuck. You sound like a warner bros A&R hahahahaha.

Murray is fucking excellent! What are you lot on about?

Sympathy for the Strawberry, Karen, Radical Adults, Rain on Tin, Plastic Sun.
end of.

Rather Ripped has got a shit title but other than that i like it

Just because I like (or love) a band doesn't mean I like all their records. I'm completely unbiased. Sure, as a natural human tendency, I might overlook some flaws on a record if I really love a band, I might try harder to see the good side of things.

Rather Ripped is an awful record.

wrong (except for 1k leaves is great)

Its them experimenting a pop format...

Whats the problem?

I just think it is time for thurston to stop wtriting songs on acoustic guitar.

fuck the folk.

Strange take. I dont agree. I like this phase. I mean, out of MURRAY ST, SONIC NURSE, RR and TREES I like RR the least. But it sounds good. And I like the songwriting on all those albums.

In Rainbows sucks. popish. and I like them less after this, and for their stupid behaviour.
they recorded only one album that counts Kid A.

Its just what comes out. Nothing more than that...It is not as conscious as you think...

Wow, I really have to disagree Mil. I mean, AMNESIAC is like a way better version of KID A. And OK COMPUTER, THE BENDS and IN RAINBOWS are all fantastic.

I like Amnesiac too, but it's like half album that is listenable.
Ok Computer is good, but not the best record of the last 25 years,
so I don't rate it so high. The Bends same as Amnesiac, only half
album. and In Rainbows, is just better than Hail to the Thief, not
fenomenal. and for Rather Ripped one more word, it's good album,
but not that good. but I hate when people are sayin' : "oh, it's
so commercial, oh.. how could they record that?!" (and most of
that people are listening Radiohead) you know what I mean?

commercial or not, i hate rr simply because it's shite.

I remember reading an interview with T that said that RR was really inspired by tween shiz that Coco was into. I dnt know. It seems like an interesting idea, really. It's not THAT far removed from the Ciccone Youth concept. Maybe people will "get" RR 10 years from now and appreciate it more.

again
radiohead wanted a different approach to their music for In Rainbows, an approach that it is not what i like from them. (because kid a, httt, and amnesiac is what i like from them)

same with sonic youth, they knew what they wanted for RR, otherwise they wouldnt have released it. maybe it was like a bunch of pop summer songs to say goodbye to the label or whatever it was... thing is, 'that' approach to music its not what i like from them. (noise, experimentation, improvisation,etc its what i like from them)

still i rate in rainbows and rather ripped as good albums.

fuck radiohead, rather listen to the bad seeds myself.

I thought that you had said it was the end of the thread earlier.