wow that's R rated

yes.

You won't find any smegma^ on me.
Yes Hyden, I've been neatly trimmed.

No.

i am, i was, i'm a little jewish boy.

ahh no really i had no pee-hole when i was born, so they had to dig for one.

might i also add...
good poll Hayden.

No.

nope.i come with the original packaging.ha ha.

*:D*

Didn't I already make this poll about 3 months ago?

So, you'd rather be a two-pump chump then.


Yes, you did, SpectralJulianIsNotDead. I remember posting about the Ike's Wee Wee episode in that thread...mmm, drugs are bad m'kay.

Hehe, I thought I did.

I'm still circumsized too. Haven't figured out how to grow my foreskin back.

that's not how it works either.

face it american males, you have inferior genitalia, and it is all thanks to your beloved parents.

It's a fact that girls prefer guys without a foreskin, because it's more hygienic. As for less sensitivity without a hood, no truth at all.

Cocks without foreskins are,erm....,difficult for certain things.Let's put it that way.

"It's better with a head when giving head"

less urine gets built-up on the surface when you're circumsized.
I would imagine it stimulates the G-spot more than those who weren't circumsized :)

Exactly! Listen to the pro's^ peoples!

seriously, you guys have no idea what you are talking about. when an uncut penis gets erect the foreskin draws back and no longer covers the glans. i don't know what you think this has to do with the g-spot. and the hygiene theory is complete bollocks. there was a Straight Dope article about this recently that proves me right too.

Toilet & Bowels, to be fair, you have absolutely know idea what having a foreskinless penis is like. So, in short, shut the fuck up.

I'm reffering to a woman's sexual pleasure, not a man's. And the hygene theory is completely true and I've heard it from several sources.