Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonic Sounds (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   What happened to all the rock gods? (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=23549)

atsonicpark 07.19.2008 07:17 AM

everything in popular culture has went downhill since the 80's really.

batreleaser 07.19.2008 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark
everything in popular culture has went downhill since the 80's really.


amen. ever since then weve had to go deeper into the underground for good tunes. even college rock today is shit frat music. even popular literature has gone downhill. the only thing in the mainstream that is still good is film. especially the past year or so, theres been a lot of big budget flicks thatr i have loved.

Glice 07.19.2008 08:36 AM

Yeah, and wasn't trepanning so much better than these modern fangled MRI machines?

✌➬ 07.19.2008 11:31 AM

Umm, not anytime soon. Who cares, enjoy music. Carry on.

demonrail666 07.19.2008 12:50 PM

No, let's discuss the trepanning issue. It's far more interesting than Rock Gods, surely. And i say this as one of the few people on here who still reads Q magazine!

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
I can definitely see a time soon when the saturation of bands like Coldplay, Radiohead, Sigur Ros, etc, creates a massive critical backlash that will pave the way for a new Guns n Roses type outfit to once again clean up - which will, in itself, lead to yet another Radiohead-of-sorts, and so on. The depressing predictability of Rock is how it never seems able (at least in terms of its more commercial A-List) to break out of this cycle. There's always another Slash waiting in the wings, just as there's always another Jonny Greenwood.

Yeah, and while both have their strengths... one is always infinitley more entertaining to see.

I mean part of teh fun of rock and roll is that its supposed to frighten the elderly... I mean I'm sure part of the fun of liking metal in the eighties was the fact that the pmrc and religous groups were throwing an absolute fit about it..
When your parents music was more scandolous and rowdy than your generation's is something's wrong.
I mean like I've said there's always room for the mellow artists, but when even the "rock" bands have no real star quality there's a problem.
There also seems to be a lack of classic singers either (no morrisons, plants, or hell even osbornes...)

Another truth that I think isn't really faced is that in mainstream music culture, rap is the new rock... it still shocks, and while there is barely any creativity going on in the genre any more, there are still some genuine stars of that genre.

Rap is where music went after Kurt Cobain died and people got tired of the lame post-grunge shit thruted upon us by the radio.

Cantankerous 07.19.2008 02:33 PM

i love some rap

most of the rap i like happened 20-30 years ago though

grandmaster flash ftw
and NWA

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:35 PM

That was when it was musically interestsing.... even if NWA were shit heads in real life.

I mean you listen to Public Enemy and then you hear Soulja Boy and you just get sad how much mainstream rap has regressed...

Cantankerous 07.19.2008 02:36 PM

lol @ soulja boy


YOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:38 PM

I mean what the fuck....
XD
Learn the soulja boy (and many other shit modern rappers) method of song writing: Punch buttons on your cell phone in a pattern until you find something that sounds 'catchy', repeat it for five minutes, and brag about yourself in the third person in less than 10 words for those five minutes.

Cantankerous 07.19.2008 02:39 PM

basically

they're making shitloads of money off it though

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:40 PM

Yeah...
Doesn't make it cool... XD
Haha I have to hear it far to often, so I can't even give them credit for exploitation XD

demonrail666 07.19.2008 02:41 PM

The problem with the current crop of Rap 'Gods' is that they really are the genre's least interesting figures (musically at least). Say what you like about Clapton, Hendrix, etc, but at least in their day they were on the cutting edge of what they did. you just can't say the same about someone like P. Diddy.

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:42 PM

I don't know, Lil wayne is pretty interesting.
And Kanye is if nothing a dynamic person... XD

But yeah. Its easy to forget clapton's awesomemness when he became such a wimpy shit head in the eighties...

Dr. Eugene Felikson 07.19.2008 02:55 PM

I can't read a metal magazine without drowning in articles on Disturbed or Corey Taylor's recent onslaught of suck.


 



 


*spews in mouth*

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 02:57 PM

I don't think that qualifies as rock god.
I don't think the kids really go crazy for these people
And I doubt either one of them will be immortalized in later generations.

demonrail666 07.19.2008 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Eugene Felikson


 





Wow. Do people actually take a band that looks like that remotely seriously?

Dr. Eugene Felikson 07.19.2008 03:00 PM

You're lucky if you've never crossed the path of a dim witted teen who swore on either band/artist as the best thing since sliced bread. They breed like rabbits 'round these parts.

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 03:01 PM

All the pre-teens who think their problems are unique an life shattering seem to think they are the shit....
And who else thinks the name disturbed is a load of shit? XD
Charles Mannson was distrubed...these guys are just unnecessarily angsty (in the worst way)

demonrail666 07.19.2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Eugene Felikson
You're lucky if you've never crossed the path of a dim witted teen who swore on either band/artist as the best thing since sliced bread. They breed like rabbits 'round these parts.


Haha, I'm sure. although i did have the misfortune recently of having to endure someone trying at great length to convince me that Avenged Sevenfold would totally change my life.

viewtiful_alan 07.19.2008 03:08 PM

They could....
They might make you decide you wanted to kill Avenged Sevenfold thus ladning yourself in jail... I guess they could change your life in that way.
Sadly I like them better than fucking disturbed...

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 03:10 PM

Disturbed has 0 redeeming qualities. There are very few bands I say that about.

demonrail666 07.19.2008 03:11 PM

I don't think I've heard either. Probably best I don't. Who knows, I might end up liking them. Then I'd have to kill myself. Which would be really life-changing.

Dr. Eugene Felikson 07.19.2008 03:12 PM

They also lack originality in the marketing department...

EDIT: Click the link, sorry I couldn't find a good source for the image I was looking for.

http://img.hottopic.com/is/image/HotTopic/928061_hi?wid=500&hei=751&fmt=jpeg&qlt=85,0&op_sha rpen=1&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.0,0.0,0,0&iccEmbed=0


 

demonrail666 07.19.2008 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acousticrock87
Disturbed has 0 redeeming qualities. There are very few bands I say that about.


That's actually made me quite intrigued to hear them.:eek:

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 03:24 PM

Basically, Korn minus the creativity.

Everyneurotic 07.19.2008 03:25 PM

disturbed used to be hilarious!

"ohh-wah-cacaca"

Cantankerous 07.19.2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acousticrock87
Basically, Korn minus the creativity.

ffs

korn are not creative

demonrail666 07.19.2008 03:26 PM

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zzak8Gq3KO0

Blimey. They really are unbelievably rubbish aren't they! I'm surprised they have a record deal, let alone a fanbase.

Cantankerous 07.19.2008 03:26 PM

the guitar sounds deliciously evil right at the beginning

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
disturbed used to be hilarious!

"ohh-wah-cacaca"

Hahaha. Word-for-word, too.

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 03:28 PM

I was about to say, "Actually, the song 'Walk' was really good."

But it's by Pantera.

demonrail666 07.19.2008 03:30 PM

Please tell me that nobody over the age of 8 actually likes them.

Everyneurotic 07.19.2008 03:39 PM

pantera were great.

disturbed are very ridiculous, funny as shit. at least the first album.

Glice 07.19.2008 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viewtiful_alan
Yeah, and while both have their strengths... one is always infinitley more entertaining to see.

I mean part of teh fun of rock and roll is that its supposed to frighten the elderly... I mean I'm sure part of the fun of liking metal in the eighties was the fact that the pmrc and religous groups were throwing an absolute fit about it..
When your parents music was more scandolous and rowdy than your generation's is something's wrong.
I mean like I've said there's always room for the mellow artists, but when even the "rock" bands have no real star quality there's a problem.
There also seems to be a lack of classic singers either (no morrisons, plants, or hell even osbornes...)

Another truth that I think isn't really faced is that in mainstream music culture, rap is the new rock... it still shocks, and while there is barely any creativity going on in the genre any more, there are still some genuine stars of that genre.

Rap is where music went after Kurt Cobain died and people got tired of the lame post-grunge shit thruted upon us by the radio.


Quote:

Originally Posted by viewtiful_alan
Learn the soulja boy (and many other shit modern rappers) method of song writing: Punch buttons on your cell phone in a pattern until you find something that sounds 'catchy', repeat it for five minutes, and brag about yourself in the third person in less than 10 words for those five minutes.


I think the shock of a lot of youth music is that the older generation simply don't get it. And you, my dear, clearly don't get Soulja Boy. Not that I do myself. I'd be surprised if anyone over 18 did. And that's why a lot of kids love it. Because it really, really pisses people older than them off. Maybe the big change since the late 70s is that by now people are expecting young people's music to be different from theirs.

I'll tell you one thing that pisses me off. Kids no more than 17 going on about fucking Clapton. I'd prescribe them all masses of gurners and a visit to Helter Skelter. Your teen years are the time to listen to music that is deeply regrettable in years to come. It's a time to wear clothes that you'll never be able to pull off in maturity. Look at the nu-ravers. I would look... actually, I'm fucking amazing at clothes, so let's assume the 'I' is someone other than me... 'I' would look fucking awful dressed like a nu-raver, because I'm not a lithe and slightly spotty, bad-haircutted 17-year-old.

To summarise - if the music you're listening to doesn't piss off your parents, you're doing something wrong.

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 04:49 PM

I agree to an extent, but I think it's fine for kids to listen to Clapton, too. While my dad seemed quite confused when he found out I liked Neil Diamond ("Huh...That was old people music even when it came out...") they still couldn't stand (and still can't, I imagine, though I no longer listen to hardcore/metal) most of my music. Now theres about 1/3 of my CDs that my dad borrows on occasion and 2/3 he would never even touch. It's a delicate balance.

EDIT: Oversubordination rules.

demonrail666 07.19.2008 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
I think the shock of a lot of youth music is that the older generation simply don't get it. And you, my dear, clearly don't get Soulja Boy. Not that I do myself. I'd be surprised if anyone over 18 did. And that's why a lot of kids love it. Because it really, really pisses people older than them off. Maybe the big change since the late 70s is that by now people are expecting young people's music to be different from theirs.

I'll tell you one thing that pisses me off. Kids no more than 17 going on about fucking Clapton. I'd prescribe them all masses of gurners and a visit to Helter Skelter. Your teen years are the time to listen to music that is deeply regrettable in years to come. It's a time to wear clothes that you'll never be able to pull off in maturity. Look at the nu-ravers. I would look... actually, I'm fucking amazing at clothes, so let's assume the 'I' is someone other than me... 'I' would look fucking awful dressed like a nu-raver, because I'm not a lithe and slightly spotty, bad-haircutted 17-year-old.

To summarise - if the music you're listening to doesn't piss off your parents, you're doing something wrong.


I absolutely agree with this. Pop music is a young person's game. I can't stand it when people my age force their opinions on kids.

Getting older should be about becoming comfortable with your own taste, not worrying about those of kids who are no doubt having an absolutely brilliant time, regardless of whether some wide waisted old fart like me thinks what they're listening to is utter poo - which I usually do.

There are two great joys in a person's musical path. The first takes place in your early teens when you develop your first musical obsession, the second comes much later, when you realise that, actually, Dire Strait's first album is a bit of a corker. But if I ever saw a 17 year old bopping along to Sultans of Swing, I'd hang the imaginationless little bore from the nearest willow.

Classic rock is like pyjamas. You need a good few years before realising that, actually, they're great. But you need those years to prove it. Wearing pyjamas before your thirty is, like listening to Dire Straits, a complete betrayal of your youth.

Glice 07.19.2008 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
I absolutely agree with this. Pop music is a young person's game. I can't stand it when people my age force their opinions on kids.

Getting older should be about becoming comfortable with your own taste, not worrying about those of kids who are no doubt having an absolutely brilliant time, regardless of whether some wide waisted old fart like me thinks what they're listening to is utter poo - which I usually do.

There are two great joys in a person's musical path. The first takes place in your early teens when you develop your first musical obsession, the second comes much later, when you realise that, actually, Dire Strait's first album is a bit of a corker. But if I ever saw a 17 year old bopping along to Sultans of Swing, I'd hang the imaginationless little bore from the nearest willow.

Classic rock is like pyjamas. You need a good few years before realising that, actually, they're great. But you need those years to prove it. Wearing pyjamas before your thirty is, like listening to Dire Straits, a complete betrayal of your youth.


I expect there's a 40+ year old chap reading this going, "Ah, I remember that. I hope that jumped up little twat doesn't think he's old enough to listen to Chris Rea. That's for people my age".

The thing that makes me uncomfortable (sometimes) is the bands that I like that the kiddies of 16-19 or so also like, and I get a bit too excited and starting gashing on about how if they like x they should listen to [hopelessly obscure]y. You see their eyes glaze over and they're looking around for their mates, but they're not there, so the only option is the toilet, which they've just come from. Next thing you know, they've had to suffer the indignity of me realising that I'm one of those people t'other side of 25 who is, in fact, a bit of a music snob/ bore, no matter how many times I say I like Michael Jackson. Luckily, I don't hang around with kiddies that young too often, if I can help it.

Glice 07.19.2008 05:27 PM

Incidentally, it makes me feel slightly relieved that I still think Dire Straits are pretty dull. Ten years ago I would've said something far more vituperous (but it's unlikely I'd've known what 'vituperous' meant).

acousticrock87 07.19.2008 05:35 PM

Well it's certainly my new word for the day.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth