sarramkrop |
08.25.2008 05:46 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonrail666
That's an interesting problem. Far more interesting, as it happens, than this reply. But still. I suppose by 'human' we refer to things like 'warmth' and 'spontaneity' and the capacity for error (with machines representing the opposite of these supposed 'virtues'). These distinctions are obviously a bit cliched, but nonetheless, they do sort of work for the sake of an argument.
what we're talking about here is an attempt to humanize the machine. Part of me wants to reject this whole pursuit. Unfortunately, being human I can probably never do anything but humanize the machines i interact with, but I'm not sure how much I can properly determine 'how human they'll sound'. Somewhere between these two states is an aggregate which, when I think about it, is probably the most fruitfull method when having to deal with these little plastic boxes. As such, it's not about surrendering to their mechanical nature, but nor is it about ever thinking we can make them 'one of us'.
I'm just thinking this through in post-form. No biggie.
|
I see where you're coming from, and agree in that it's not like you can suddenly humanise the machine itself ( it is a machine, after all), but you can make it sound like it has been stimulated, played etc by a human being, rather than let it do the basic drum patterns in the more soulless and mechanical ways.
Not that the soulless way is something that I am particularly against to, as it does work out in a nice way for some people, it's just that having used machines for so long I know fairly well that trial and error can totally make you forget that you are listening to something thought of as electronic, artificial, constantly similar-sounding to much other music produced in similar ways etc.
What I'm basically trying to say - and I hope that it comes across as vaguely comprehensible - is that what you should aim at with them is finding the proverbial ghost in the machine, and that's something that only the human being operating these things is capable of. We do create these things, don't we?
|