Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   but is it really art? i mean, come on... (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=37035)

demonrail666 01.05.2010 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keeping It Simple
The average person has never fallen for all that pseud hyperbole that only ever convinces imbecilic poseurs with more money than sense.


Since when has a person's liking of experimental or modern art had anything to do with money? If you're broke, a stroll around a major gallery filled with modern art is a decent and usually cost-free way to kill the day. It costs money to cast a vote on Celebrity Big Brother, though. God bless the financial nous of your 'average person'.

Skuj 01.05.2010 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
LOL, sorry about last night. I got a bit excited. I'm not really angry.

Anyway, here's a Bateman. :)



 


Just to be clear, this painting just deflates me. It does absolutely NOTHING for me. Great technical talent though, I suppose.

This is not Art, surely?

ploesj 01.05.2010 01:55 PM

you might as well take a picture.

it's nocoincidence that abstract art started when photography started to offer more and more possibilities. before photography hyperrealistic painting was necessary because there was no alternative.

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greedrex
 



 

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
Oh Man......

I buy used Art books and cut Pollock out to frame. (He'd probably kill me for that.)

Your post is ultra brainwashed / generalizing....whatev.....I'm genuinely angry at it, but I'll recover quickly....

"familiar" "pretentious" "average" "psued" "hyperbole" "poseurs" "money/sense"

Goddammit!!!!


Haven't you been brainwashed into thinking Pollock's art is good?

demonrail666 01.05.2010 02:11 PM


 

maybe your nonsense would be a bit more palatable if you happened to be as erection inducing as cartoon depictions of Ann Coulter.

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
 

maybe your nonsense would be a bit more palletable if you happened to be as erection inducing as cartoon depictions of Ann Coulter.


I see you've been brainwashed into thinking lame cartoon depictions of Ann Coulter can be used as an insult on message boards.

demonrail666 01.05.2010 02:23 PM

you seem to be obsessed with this idea that people who don't agree with you have in some way been brainwashed. It's odd.

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
you seem to be obsessed with this idea that people who don't agree with you have in some way been brainwashed. It's odd.


Not as odd as being brainwashed into using a lame, deflective counterargument like that against people who you think are obsessed with the idea that people who don't agree with them have in some way been brainwashed.

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 02:37 PM

I like that painting of a leopard!

it surely is art. a great painting caputres much more than a photograph can.

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
I like that painting of a leopard!

it surely is art. a great painting caputres much more than a photograph can.


I agree. Technically it's faultless to the degree that it's difficult to differentiate it from a photograph. :)

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 02:50 PM

that oil on masonite painting will be around far lomger than a film negative or a print will remain undamaged.

Glice 01.05.2010 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keeping It Simple
Not as odd as being brainwashed into using a lame, deflective counterargument like that against people who you think are obsessed with the idea that people who don't agree with them have in some way been brainwashed.


You seem to have been brainwashed into believing that the brainwashing you've received was actually received by the people you're talking to, who are brainwashed into making perfectly reasonable arguments while you, brainwashedly, have been brainwashed into perceiving perfectly valid and reasonable arguments as an affront to your personality which, in your brainwashed state, you seem to ignore the fact that you're talking complete and utter shite while accusing other people of precisely the rabid incoherency and nonsense that the only the brainwashed (ie, you) could believe.

Keeping It Simple 01.05.2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
You seem to have been brainwashed into believing that the brainwashing you've received was actually received by the people you're talking to, who are brainwashed into making perfectly reasonable arguments while you, brainwashedly, have been brainwashed into perceiving perfectly valid and reasonable arguments as an affront to your personality which, in your brainwashed state, you seem to ignore the fact that you're talking complete and utter shite while accusing other people of precisely the rabid incoherency and nonsense that the only the brainwashed (ie, you) could believe.


More brainwashed nonsense. You shouldn't be letting others do the thinking for you.

Glice 01.05.2010 02:57 PM

 

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 03:10 PM

 

demonrail666 01.05.2010 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
 


Oh you postmodern conceptualist you

!@#$%! 01.05.2010 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by looking glass spectacle
i




after looking around for a minute for clues i found this plaque that indicated that the museum had purchased the long yellow hose from a mexican hose salesman in 1996.



 



... i've never before felt an impulse to immediately dismiss a piece of art as worthless/not art. there's always been something there that i could at least get a critical/interpretive handle on... some real or imagined more or less vague intention towards meaning that i could at least sink my teeth into and then accept or reject on those terms... at least engaging the work before saying that i don't like it/think it's poorly executed/downright idiotic...

but this absolutely refuses to be anything other than simply a hose... is that the point? more duchamp than duchamp? urinal as urinal and not readymade? if so, why is the hose not in use as a hose?


does anyone else "get it"?


i could come up with some sort of bullshit invention in 3 seconds.

eg- "the yellow hose is meant to remind us of the workers who labor to support the esthetic pleasures of the upper classes. like orozco, many of those workers are of mexican origin, and the bilingual title alludes to this..."

etc etc

ha ha ha

i still thik it's crap. but it do like how it fucks up the museum like they're in the middle of tending the yard or something. not that i have been there.

i hope he made good money from it though.

 


i haven't read the rest of the thread, i supposed there is much blah blah, but time is short.

Skuj 01.05.2010 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
You seem to have been brainwashed into believing that the brainwashing you've received was actually received by the people you're talking to, who are brainwashed into making perfectly reasonable arguments while you, brainwashedly, have been brainwashed into perceiving perfectly valid and reasonable arguments as an affront to your personality which, in your brainwashed state, you seem to ignore the fact that you're talking complete and utter shite while accusing other people of precisely the rabid incoherency and nonsense that the only the brainwashed (ie, you) could believe.


I do regret using the word "brainwashed" last night.

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 04:32 PM

I thought the cans of artist shit were cool.

Lamont Cranston 01.05.2010 04:46 PM

looking glass spectacle replace it with a genuine water hose, if nobody notices then it is not art.

Genteel Death 01.05.2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ploesj
at a certain point in this century art started to be more about art itself than about making a picture of something. all work had to be refreshing and original, which would mean the end of art, because as soon as you show the piece a second time it's not original anymore.

Good point. Because of the fastest technological advancement we experienced in what can be historically considered a short space of time, the thirst for originality sky-rocketed in ways that didn't happen on previous centuries, and went hand in hand with the core purpose for producing artwork like never before. This isn't a bad thing at all, when an artist produces work that can fight for space in a saturated market without heavy-handed, redundant contextualization, but when you see a dog being starved in a gallery with the dubious intentions of presenting it as art, any genuinely intelligent person should question if the meaning of originality that naturally impacts on the viewer has been distorted by the artist (and whoever supports his/her work).

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 04:54 PM

You are invited to the Blood Orgy of the Atomic Fern

ploesj 01.05.2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
I like that painting of a leopard!

it surely is art. a great painting caputres much more than a photograph can.


this might be true, but in some way, i find being able to paint a photorealistic picture a bit of a waste of time. it's a great skil, and one of the first things we learnt in art school was to draw a realistic picture from what we saw, just because you have to understand reality before you can turn it into something of your own. i love drawings from life that have an artist's interpretation in them, because it makes the works ten times more personal. a model sketch by egon schiele is far more interesting to me than that leopard.

right now i'm at a point in my education where we still get classes in drawing from life, but our teacher assumes we know reality well enough to give it our own twist. right now, i go to a museum of old airplanes with my bits and pieces of paper, i look at an airplane and i make this:

 

Genteel Death 01.05.2010 05:27 PM

Also, an artist who happens to find an original formula not necessarily becomes the best practitioner when using that formula. The idea that something is best only when it's done first is a myth. The Ramones found a way of writing songs that has its own distinctive, if derivative, trademark, yet my ears detect a (disputable) improvement when the Ramones' formula is used by Shonen Knife.

demonrail666 01.05.2010 05:34 PM

Absolutely. And to use your same example, while I love the Ramones (conceptually) more than probably any band, I have to admit that I think on record, Action Swingers did a better version of the Ramones than the originals did.

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 05:37 PM

ploesj, maybe you assume that the painting of the leaopard is some sort of photorealist image, or an image taken directly from photographs? It could very well be a completely made up scene, but by an artist familiar with big cats.
just sayin'. Love yr plane though.

You would not want schiele to paint images for inclusion in an animal compendium right? each art has it's purpose.

demonrail666 01.05.2010 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
ploesj, maybe you assume that the painting of the leaopard is some sort of photorealist image, or an image taken directly from photographs? It could very well be a completely made up scene, but by an artist familiar with big cats.


That's a good point but a bad example. Bateman, who painted the leopard, always paints from photographs.

This Is Not Here 01.05.2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

This is not Art, surely?


This is not Here, surely?

Rob Instigator 01.05.2010 05:49 PM

ya never know.

I prefer abstraction myself, but I also love optical illusions.

EVOLghost 01.05.2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

I prefer abstraction myself, but I also love optical illusions.




a lot of pot oriented people are man..

dale_gribble 01.05.2010 10:47 PM

everything is art.

looking glass spectacle 01.06.2010 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ploesj

 


that's pretty awesome... i love old graph papers, log charts, time cards and stuff... anything with technical looking dashed lines and arrows and crap. you've managed to make it all flow like texture or contours without distracting from the image of the plane... i also really like how the fold/binding provides an illusion of two white walls coming to a corner behind the airplane like in a gallery. it really adds depth to the thing... wonder if that was intentional or one of those 'beautiful accidents?'




... also, i'm wondering if this is really art at all :p

Skuj 01.06.2010 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
I like that painting of a leopard!

it surely is art. a great painting caputres much more than a photograph can.


But what does that painting do for you though? Serious question.

Dr. Eugene Felikson 01.06.2010 03:07 AM

Paintings as realistic as that leopard astound me. If I weren't told that it was a painting, I would've actually assumed it were a photograph.

At most, that yellow hose could make me think, "Yeah, that's kinda clever." But something painted with such precision, that it actually appears lifelike...that really sets me aback.

alteredcourse 01.06.2010 03:15 AM

The leopards have in me wonder at how a person can stay in such close focus to capture the details of lighting and tones and expression and proportion of real life to produce such a thing. The hand by itself will gladly mash splotches and circles into a canvas.

The focus!!

I mean, have you ever tried to simply copy a picture? You can still translate things so horribly, just like in conversation, saying things you didnt mean to.

Also, geez, I feel like my eyes could touch the soft velvet of that cat.

ploesj 01.06.2010 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by looking glass spectacle
that's pretty awesome... i love old graph papers, log charts, time cards and stuff... anything with technical looking dashed lines and arrows and crap. you've managed to make it all flow like texture or contours without distracting from the image of the plane... i also really like how the fold/binding provides an illusion of two white walls coming to a corner behind the airplane like in a gallery. it really adds depth to the thing... wonder if that was intentional or one of those 'beautiful accidents?'




... also, i'm wondering if this is really art at all :p


thanks! the fold is not intentional, we are supposed to work in a large sketchbook for this class so there always is some line running through my drawings... the paper is an old clothing pattern sheet from a nineties burda magazine, combined with red chalk paper and details of grey ink.

i don't call this, art, to me it's an excercise that turned out well.

Rob Instigator 01.06.2010 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj
But what does that painting do for you though? Serious question.


nothing more than allow me to appreciate what a giant cat looks like resting on a branch.

SONIC GAIL 01.06.2010 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Eugene Felikson
Paintings as realistic as that leopard astound me. If I weren't told that it was a painting, I would've actually assumed it were a photograph.

At most, that yellow hose could make me think, "Yeah, that's kinda clever." But something painted with such precision, that it actually appears lifelike...that really sets me aback.


I thought it was a photo at first. I have alot of respect for someone that can make something like that out of nothing. I know if I painted that leopard he would look like a dog that was hit by a car. I have always admired that talent.

Toilet & Bowels 01.06.2010 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SONIC GAIL
I thought it was a photo at first. I have alot of respect for someone that can make something like that out of nothing. I know if I painted that leopard he would look like a dog that was hit by a car. I have always admired that talent.


no doubt dudes like that are talented but i don't understand how they can be bothered to take the time to paint like that as it's a very painstaking process.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth