![]() |
|
Quote:
here he’s saying “non capisco” i think, to the angel of literature, after he lost his soul but damn i love this movie like only a few things, so thanks for the gif(t) |
A Futile and Stupid Gesture. Right after a documentary on National Lampoon. Lots of old school comedy today.
|
Quote:
Haha, yeah, the finger was better but that would work better if h8kurdt had used it as a rebuttal to me. But yeah, I'd watched La Dolce Vita again the other day and I couldn't resist. The best of the best. |
one thing i’m noticing from my amazon and netflix fix is the lack of a great movie selection on the streaming side.
sure everything they have is at your fingertips, but it’s mostly shit. great movies are few and far between. i read somewhere that criterion was starting their own service. that’s doomed to fail i think, because where’s the app for it? is it an apple thing? doesn’t show like an option to add to my devices. i’m not gonna watch in a damn computer. i wish they had an amazon channel so i could add the extra subscription. |
Quote:
The criterion streaming is called FilmStruck. It’s atually a Turner Classic Movies streaming service but you have the option to add the criterion package. I had it for a while but it was very new and not compatible to put on my TV via chrome cast. Now I think they’ve updated it a bit but not sure. Regardless the selection was off the charts and would constantly be refreshed with a different selection and special features. |
I don't have a streaming service so still rely on DVDs, and even there art house films tends to retail higher than regular ones, I suppose because of the relative lack of demand or because fans of art house films are (wrongly) perceived as having more money. Streaming is the future though, so if a company like Criterion gets in on the act (and sorts out comptability issues) I'll consider switching over.
|
Quote:
We've the BFI for that. They've some great films one there Here |
Watched Rare Exports yesterday with the wifey.
![]() weird flick. funny, creepy, and whimsical in odd arctic circle ways. |
Quote:
Wow, I'd no idea. Thanks! |
Speaking of Helen Mirren, in another thread, I watched Caligula last night. Felt weird being able to buy the fully uncut version in HMV considering bits of it are essentially hardcore porn. The film has a terrible rep, with almost everyone involved having now disowned it, but for what it is, it's actually not bad - certainly better than some more mainstream films I've seen about the same thing. It's still odd though though, seeing the likes of Peter O'Toole, Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren and John Gielgud playing it straight while all kinds of hardcore shenanigans are going on around them.
Would make a great double bill with Fellini's Satyricon. ![]() |
yep, it’s actually not bad. i watched it after being done with i claudius and enjoyed it. it wasn’t great or anything—i hardly remember it except for some visuals—not the porn, ha ha, i don’t think i saw a porn version, or maybe i did and didn’t register because the internet has made me immune at this point. it’s no satyricon though— actually i didn’t enjoy satyricon the first time i saw it. took me a couple of rewatches. that thing is pure genius, but it’s kinda “out there” and a little inaccessible.
|
To be honest, I might actually prefer Caligula over Satyricon.
|
satyricon is fucking sublime but it’s definitely not “entertainment”. you have to really pay attention to get transported. it’s mostly a visual thing in red earths and azures. i can’t recall all of the whole story— and that’s fine. it’ not a novel like the book, but a hallucination.
reminds me somewhat of salò, which i had to really work through. though satyricon was hilarious where salò was dark as fuck and so hard to look at. but both were “work.” caligula on the other hand is good trashy fun. i’ll watch it with a pitcher of sangía and a bag of spicy chicharrones, and won’t feel tired at the end. totally more enjoyable in that sense. — ETA: my wife, who is really a visual person, used to own the satyricon vhs and watch it all the time like a pocorn movie. on the other hand she hates “talky” flicks, with only a few exceptions. |
This page of Caligula trivia is mighty entertaining:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080491/...ef_=ttalt_ql_1 I don't know why, but I like this one a lot: John Gielgud told Malcolm McDowell that he enjoyed the film so much that he paid to see it twice. |
|
Quote:
According to that same page, he told McDowell of the film, "it's wonderful. I've never seen so much cock in my life". Maybe not in one place John. |
I Claudius is great. It's one of those the TV historians drag out (alongside Civilisation and Play for Today) when they talk about a golden age of British TV.
|
what’s especially fantastic about i claudius for me is how much they did with so little money.
they’d stand on some evident cardboard sets, give speeches to an invisible “crowd” made of sound recordings, and managed to pull off absolutely thrilling tv. by contrast these days there’d be more emphasis on CGI filler and stunt work and fucking and gore. and sure there’s a place for that in the universe but it’s not the same quality as a good, well-acted plot. |
Quote:
Absolutely. Although that was probably quite a big, expensive production for the BBC back then. But yeah, where it really shines is the sheer quality of the acting and writing. Always thought Sian Phillips (Livia) would've made a great female Bond villain ![]() Did you ever see The Borgias? Another BBC mini-series from that period. Not quite as good as I, Claudius but still very much in the same vein. |
watched The Vanishing with the wifey this weekend. Never seen Jeff bridges play a fucking psycho before. quite well done portraying the true nature of the psychopath mentality.
![]() |
^ be sure to check out the Dutch original version of that, much superior, IMO
now watching The Shape of Water, about halfway thru.... It's another fairy tale. This one, however appears to be for a much lower age demographic than Pan's. Not really much I liked about it. The soundtrack is pretty awful, too. |
Quote:
Dunkirk Blade Runner Fuckit |
lethal weapon 4 lol— same broken record as the previous 3. awful and obnoxiously superloud and the same old jokes on and on and on. but it’s done now.
the only good thing about it was jet li. next, to try finishing highlander (the original). what a chore! getting all these cultural references is like homework lol. |
Suburbicon. Definitely lower in the pantheon of Coen Bros movies, but it still had a typical Coen story, well told. Dialog wasn't up to their standards, either. Still better than a couple of ^^ ones
|
Quote:
But Clooney directed that. Only really a Coens film if they wrote and directed and did all the whatshit and whosits. Do we call Natural Born Killers a “Tarantino movie?” Nah. ‘Sa Clooney joint. |
i watched more garbage today while sorting paperwork. shit like
GAME OVER DUDE - a die hard inspired ridiculousness from the workaholics team. funny but you didn’t have to look the whole time. ALONG CAME POLLY - garbage movie but some goofy laughs and aniston was hot. it did not get in the way of work! stiller was razzie-nominated for this. 10 RULES FOR SLEEPING AROUND - truly awful plastic bitches and dorks galore. 0/10. nevertheless we kept it on while the evernote got sorted. productive! |
Spaceballs. It was still fun, which is all I could've really hoped for.
|
Quote:
Agreed. It'd be a shame if people are treating the US version as the standard one. |
Quote:
May the schwartz ever be with this movie. |
Quote:
FilmStruck is on the Roku device as of earlier this year. It's f'in goooooodddd. All Criterion available. TCM movies available. And they curate specialized films each month for a limited time. Right now, one can stream some pretty hard to find Agnes Varda films in recognition of her recent Oscar nom for "Faces Places". Hardcore film fans need this service. |
Star Wars: The Last Jedi
... What the hell was so “controversial” about this? Seriously. It was a fun Star Wars movie. Probably the second or third best one. Actually definitely the second best one. Nothing controversial to me. Alt-righters hating on the feminist agenda? Fuck it. This movie was a delight! I was actually a little let down because I was expecting some dark ass crazy shit like main characters going evil or something, but... why the hell was half the fandom’s problem with this exactly? Possibly better than Force Awakens! Love that Adam Driver man. If he lost 70lbs of muscle and went on a liquid only diet for a month, wore glasses and shrank a foot, he could play me! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the remake is on netflix. i will look for the OG |
![]() wife and I watched this finally. I thought it was awesome. |
Quote:
and Quote:
forgot to say earlier, thanks for this, it had flown undetected past my radar, and yeah, 100 bucks a year is pretty sweet! i’ll subscribe in the summer. right now i’m pretty swamped, so shitty movies that don’t demand 100% help me do extra work in the weekends ha ha ha ha. trash: it has its place in life (see my recent movies above, lol) Quote:
right? better than the original for me. sure, a different century, but still... this comes after fully digesting and absorbing cyberpunk. |
Quote:
I use their subscription service regularly and it's pretty great. They also have tons of great movies to rent at reasonable prices. |
Quote:
I thought it a much more developed and thoughtful film than the first, which I have seen countless times, in many versions, and which still has some very muddled plotting. I enjoyed it so much. made me think about self and identity and what is a cognitive truth, and what right does anyone have to decide if someone or something can be self-determinant. Lots of cool shit. Visually AMAZING. |
Quote:
anyway, you might make severian cry now, from happiness. |
I loved when after all the verbosity from the Jared Leto character, all Deckard says is "I know what's real."
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth