wtf are those from floatingslowly? hilarious.
|
Might as well post these here too:
|
|
|
|
is it a richard serra sculpture?
|
yeah. someone threw eggs at it. but it looks so cool, it's hard to be mad...
it's in princeton, new jersey on the university campus behind this frank gehry building. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
I really love the way steel weathers. There is a building in my city that is fully clad in it, and every year it just looks better. You get the odd scrawlings into it, but they all just eventually fade away and rust over. http://www.accaonline.org.au/Building |
sarramkrop are you planning a trip to Antiques Roadshow soon?
|
Quote:
|
It's almost scary/sad, these things you picked, that lonesome plus-eyed clown...
I like the tv screen too. Exciting moments of your lives, eh? |
how difficult is it to turn a bathroom into a darkroom?
|
paint the walls black
|
|
Quote:
Probably it's better if you ask a professional photographer or a student. Did you try searching on the internet? I like the second picture. |
|
|
First shot is kinda freaky. I like it.
|
Quote:
i just wanted simple instructions not some long bullshit that will take me an hour to read i'll just keep paying to have them developed, i don't think it's possible to have a dust free environment in my house thanks btw |
Quote:
Honestly not that hard at all, provided you have a safelight, the necessary chemicals and an enlarger... |
yeah but my house is old which means dust which means fucked up negatives which means fucked up prints
|
It really shouldn't be a problem unless the chemicals are old/enlarger has dust in it/etc and you keep your emulsion paper sealed off.
|
idk it just seems like kind of a pain in the ass
thanks though |
It's all horribly out of focus, which somehow helps. |
nice pics Danny.
|
st kilda from my hotel balcony with the moon rising behind a steeple. 30sec at f 5.6 300mm
|
Awesome pic man.
|
That is a phenomenal picture
|
thanks
|
Bucatini All'amatriciana I made a couple of hours ago
|
Quote:
black and white film develop is pretty easy in a home environment. Printing photos not so much but it's possible if you buy an enlarger. Colour really isn't possible.. requires more strict temperatures and timing and there isn't room for really any light, unlike b/w which is a lot less sensitive (reletively). Different equipment for develop/enlarging too, For colour yr really better off staying with an amateur/pro lab. It's going to be cheaper for you and better quality. The amount of testing and calibration to machinery a responsible lab does daily really would not compare with what most people even the artistically inclined could be bothered to do at home. With machinery that used to start heating up for me a couple hours before I'd come in of a morning, plus another 40 mins or so worth of checks and test strips and graphs before I'd even put any film/prints through. yeh.. not so much. Can you imagine doing it all for just one roll at home? b/w is easy though so I say go for that. You seem to like lo fi stuff too, so could play around with even maybe making your own enlarger and buying some second hand filters.. you could get some cool results. |
|
Quote:
those are legit nice job |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth