Sonic Youth Gossip - Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination?

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)

- Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)

- - Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination? (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=113183)

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

omarosa got fired

What the fuck was she doing there anyways?

No One Knows What Omarosa Is Doing in the White House—Even Omarosa

she was earning a $140,000/year salary for doing jack shit, except being a token black woman in the West Wing.

yeah, even with all the voter supression efforts!

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

See You Later, Allen Ginsberg

what the fuck is mega limited? i closed it twice

Get a Senator, lose the internet.

I think that's as good as things get in Trump's America.

it’s good. people might actually rise up over that shit

even 75% of republicans are for net neutrality

this ruling is pure fucking corruption

I hope you're right.

You must've consumed some peyote buttons if you think Congress will save us.

But I hope you're right.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

I hope you're right.

You must've consumed some peyote buttons if you think Congress will save us.

But I hope you're right.

oh i wish i could have the peyote to make my exit from this plane of reality for good

but no, i was talking about pissed off intenets voting EVERYONE out

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

what the fuck is mega limited? i closed it twice

Damn. Well, try See You Later, Allen Ginsberg. :cool:

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

omarosa got fired, so there goes his token black person

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

she was earning a $140,000/year salary for doing jack shit, except being a token black woman in the West Wing.

From Demand Progress:

Quote:

Yesterday was bad. But here's how we can still win on net neutrality.

If there’s one question I’ve heard since the Trump FCC’s disastrous vote yesterday to kill net neutrality, it’s “So what can we do now?”

As nearly everyone seems to grasp, yesterday’s vote is legitimately bad news. It opens the door to monopolistic corporations like Verizon or Comcast blocking, censoring, or throttling your internet traffic whenever they choose.

They can now set up fast lanes on the internet for customers or sites and apps that pay expensive shake down fees – and internet slow lanes for everyone else.

The inventor of the World Wide Web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee was not exaggerating when he called yesterday a “dark day for the internet.”

Today I want to take the time to lay out our strategy moving forward. Even if Verizon and its Big Cable friends won this round, we can still absolutely win this fight and save the open internet.

This a bit longer than our usual emails at Demand Progress, but I hope you read the whole thing.

We’re facing tough odds, but we’ve won incredible victories before even when the deck was stacked against us. Like when “everyone knew” the internet censorship bills SOPA and PIPA would sail through Congress and screw up the future of the web – until millions of internet users like you stood up and shut down that terrible legislation. Achieving the same thing again will take everyone knowing how they can help save the free and open internet we all love.

And another thing. As you read this strategy memo, please consider becoming a donor to Demand Progress so we have the resources needed to carry out this plan and save net neutrality.

PART 1: Congress

The Good News: Congress Can Overturn the FCC’s Vote Against Net Neutrality

The most important thing for you to know right now is that Congress has the power to throw out the FCC’s vote, with a powerful tool called the Congressional Review Act.

This law gives Congress 60 legislative days – which can take 4 to 6 months – to overturn a rule issued by a federal agency with a “resolution of disapproval.” Crucially, it is not subject to the filibuster, so it can pass the Senate with just 51 votes.

The CRA was used earlier this year to roll back a lot of important Obama-era rules protecting consumers, but this is a chance for us to use it to benefit ordinary people. Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and Representative Mike Doyle (D-PA) have already announced they will introduce a resolution to overturn the FCC vote.

In the Senate, the overwhelming majority of the 48 Democrats made it clear they oppose what the FCC did yesterday, and Senator-Elect Doug Jones from Alabama is an outspoken supporter of net neutrality. Then there's Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who wrote a letter to Ajit Pai urging him to cancel yesterday’s vote and preserve net neutrality rules. If we can hold all the Democrats in line and keep Collins we’re at 50 votes. We'd need to flip just 1 more.

In the House of Representatives, several Republicans spoke out opposing the FCC’s vote, and House Republicans are still smarting from the backlash after they voted to eliminate broadband privacy rules stopping your internet provider from selling your browsing history without your permission.

It will be critical that every lawmaker hears a deafening roar from their constituents to know they must ignore the Big Cable lobbyists and vote with their constituents. As always, you can contact your member of Congress through BattleForTheNet.com and promote the site to your networks.

The Threat: Bad, ISP-backed Legislation is Rearing its Ugly Head

Equally important will be fighting to stop terrible legislation backed by Big Cable lobbyists from getting through Congress.

Lobbyists at Verizon, Comcast, and the rest have had yesterday circled on their calendars months. They’re already crying that Congress should immediately pass legislation that doesn’t have all the protections of net neutrality, like blocking “paid prioritization” (fast lanes and slow lanes) and stopping throttling or censoring of traffic. “Compromise” and “regulatory certainty” are their buzzwords.

Let’s be clear about something: Nothing short of restoring the full Open Internet Order that was the law of the land as of yesterday morning is an acceptable move by Congress.

That's why we're pushing for the CRA to overturn the FCC's repeal vote entirely. Defenders of the open internet should be on guard against fake “compromise” legislation that would just cement bad rules in place permanently, like what longtime enemy of the free and open internet Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) is already talking about introducing.

PART 2: The Courts

Trump’s FCC Chair Ajit Pai can try to ignore the overwhelming public support for net neutrality (83% of Americans oppose his net neutrality repeal in the latest poll).

But here’s one group he can’t ignore: federal judges.

And the FCC could be in trouble with the courts. Ajit Pai’s order repealing net neutrality and the full 2015 Open Internet Order is on very shaky legal ground.

As the inventor of the term “net neutrality” Tim Wu wrote last month, “government agencies are not free to abruptly reverse longstanding rules on which many have relied without a good reason, such as a change in factual circumstances. A mere change in F.C.C. ideology isn’t enough.”

Read his full New York Times op-ed for the details, but suffice it to say the FCC’s legal case is weak.

Already, New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has filed a lawsuit against the FCC’s repeal of net neutrality with a group of state attorneys general. Our allies at Free Press have also announced they will file suit, and we can expect many more cases and intervenors to emerge over the coming days.

PART 3: Political Consequences for Opponents of Net Neutrality

The level of outrage over net neutrality repeal is not hard to measure:

— 83% of Americans oppose the Trump FCC’s repeal of net neutrality

— Our Team Internet activists organized and carried out more than 1,000 public protests at Verizon stores, in-person meetings with congressional offices, and appearances at congressional town halls over the past months

— People like you have made more than 1 million phone calls to Congress to save net neutrality through BattleForTheNet.com

— Our coalition was able to collect a stunning 2.5 million public comments to the FCC supporting net neutrality in just one day on our massive July 12 day of action

Members of Congress might have thought that they could hide from this issue. But with Congress able to overturn the FCC’s vote, we can get every single member of Congress on the record.

We need to make it crystal clear whose side each member of Congress is on: Their constituents who want to keep the free and open internet? Or a small set of massive ISPs who want to pad their profits by ripping off their customers?

As we head toward the 2018 mid-term elections, we can make sure that net neutrality is on every voter’s mind. The more net neutrality is a voting issue, the better are chances are of winning this.

...

Quote:

LAST THING: How We’re Going to Reach This Victory

You.

Quite simply, we can’t win without the dedicated activism and support of internet users like you.

We would have lost the fight against the internet censorship bills SOPA and PIPA without you. We would never have won strong net neutrality rules at all in 2015 were it not for people like you.

Your contributions to this fight have already made a huge impact. Jaws drop on Capitol Hill from the number of protests, constituent meetings, phone calls, emails to Congress there have been about saving the open internet.

We’re going to have to take every part of this fight to the next level. We’re facing a political system where Verizon and Comcast lobbyists and campaign contributions have a stranglehold.

As the level of energy to save net neutrality has gone through the roof, unfortunately so have our costs.

Everything from hosting the distributed events technology that enabled an astounding 700 Verizon store protests last week to developing and maintaining the call tool technology that has driven more than 1 million calls in to Congress has been more successful than we could have expected. It's a good problem to have, but still a problem if we can't raise enough to cover our higher costs.

Click here to become a donor in the fight to save net neutrality.

Thank you. Let’s win this.

David Segal
Executive Director
Demand Progress

Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination

Isnt Trump there to receive instructions from his lord and master I good not resist

But in truth, win what?

i have nice fuck

Fareed Zakaria shits on the fucking tax cuts: "Those who vote for this tax bill — possibly the worst piece of major legislation in a generation — will live in infamy, as the country slowly breaks down."

https://fareedzakaria.com/2017/12/15...-bleak-future/

Everyone here from my friend ilduclo to Schunk will dig that piece. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

Kindly read my post #3428 to this thread, which reads, in its entirety: [...]

I DID read it before posting the FZ link — that's exactly why I said you would agree with Fareed's take. What the hecks, man? :confused:

i was gonna say “poor schunk got taken by a huckster”

so i went looking for a picture and googled “trump huckster”

and this popped up and i read it:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...j0D_story.html

and it quotes this:

Back in 1990, Ivana Trump told her divorce lawyer Michael Kennedy that “from time to time, her husband [Donald Trump] reads a book of Hitler’s collected speeches, ‘My New Order,’ which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed.”

it would be funny if it weren’t so horrifying at this point. too much even for gallows humor.

“the comeback huckster”

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

Remember George Carlin's "Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television" aka Seven Dirty Words monologue? Meet Seven Dirty Words II: The Trump Edition — Seven Words The CDC Now Cannot Use:

Vulnerable
Entitlement
Diversity
Transgender
Fetus
Evidence-based
Science-based

I shit you NOT:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?undefined=&utm_term=.37ef7 ce11280&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I hope they say them anyway. Fuck it all.

EPA hires informant company to spy and report on employees.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tru...oring-company/

"Defiiners Public Affairs" owned by (noshit) "Joe Pounder", with cheese, I assume

2nd most punchable face on the internet (after Pai)

more shit for Puerto Ricans, Repubes kick them when they're down

https://wonkette.com/627250/cat-5-ta...or-puerto-rico

2017 sucked and I mostly blame Trump and I'm not even joking.

btw, poor schunk got taken by a huckster

also, in 2016 suchfriends was wrong and hasn’t yet gotten over it

ROUGH!

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

btw, poor schunk got taken by a huckster

"Schunk got punk'd"?

Yeah, enjoy that congressman, there, you Dutchers! Almost as good as our emba(ar)asador to the Holy See!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilduclo

http://media.crooksandliars.com/2017...7.mp4_high.mp4

Fucking brilliant.

this looks like something out of john oliver

aesthetic criticism and wishful thinking

do not like

but ok i see how some might feel relief with this illusion

to me it just rubs it in worse— ultrasoft liberals running off to fantasyland

enjoy your “tax cut” :(

nah, forget the sadface. stay fucking angry. :mad:

i suppose it’s meant to highlight what an asshole the guy is but it’s not like we don’t know already

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...

Aesthetic criticism, sure, what's not to thrash about that blob of orange pus. Wishful thinking and fantasyland? You're crapping outside the bowl — leading with "This is what we wish he'd said, so we've done it for him" is part of the joke, goddammit. It's not meant to be a relief-inducing illusion.

As for the magical tax cuts, I think pretty much everyone here knows they're bullcrap, so I can't tell why you're throwing that at us... unless you're actually directing it to the 33% or whatever the hell percentage it is these days.

ETA:

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i suppose it’s meant to highlight what an asshole the guy is but it’s not like we don’t know already

So everyone (starting with Jon Oliver, apparently...) should stop highlighting it? Dude, you yourself would post half the amount of comments you normally do. Fuck that, let's keep twisting the knife. And if you wanna talk about "more substantial", the mid-terms are coming, I'm all ears...

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla

bla bla bla bla

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla

bla bla bla

bla bla bla