Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   >>the last movie you watched (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=9589)

LifeDistortion 11.25.2014 06:44 PM

So the Star Wars Episode trailer is premiering on Friday, but haven't hear if its playing in front of specific movies or just in front of various movies (Hunger Games/Big Hero 6/Interstellar?) seem like the more likely ones, also doesn't seem to be anything special for IMAX like IMAX-exclusive trailer, did Abrams even film any of Star Wars in IMAX?

demonrail666 11.25.2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LifeDistortion
So the Star Wars Episode trailer is premiering on Friday, but haven't hear if its playing in front of specific movies or just in front of various movies (Hunger Games/Big Hero 6/Interstellar?) seem like the more likely ones, also doesn't seem to be anything special for IMAX like IMAX-exclusive trailer, did Abrams even film any of Star Wars in IMAX?


Abrams has confirmed via twitter that some scenes have been shot for imax after photos were 'leaked' showing imax cameras being used on set.

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 11.26.2014 04:21 PM

Wait, there is even MORE Star Wars crap coming?? I swear they ruined a beautiful film legacy with those "prequels" in the 90s/2000s, why could they KEEP ruining it? The first three were brilliant, why not cap it off there? Why milk an already epic brand into the ground? Let X-men and Batman continue to shoot themselves in various body parts, but Star Wars should have quit when they were ahead.. in the motherfucking 1980s yo ;)

h8kurdt 11.26.2014 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
Wait, there is even MORE Star Wars crap coming?? I swear they ruined a beautiful film legacy with those "prequels" in the 90s/2000s, why could they KEEP ruining it? The first three were brilliant, why not cap it off there? Why milk an already epic brand into the ground? Let X-men and Batman continue to shoot themselves in various body parts, but Star Wars should have quit when they were ahead.. in the motherfucking 1980s yo ;)


Have you been living under a rock or something?!

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 11.26.2014 04:43 PM

Simple answer.. yes ;)

 

tw2113 11.27.2014 02:12 AM

 

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 11.28.2014 04:15 PM

Finally saw all of Cloud Atlas and perhaps its because of love great set production and costumes.. I also connected with it deeply. I particularly liked the juxtapositioning of different eras and time periods almost seamlessly.. however I didnt like the romance novel ending, too many movies make romance the center of plot, that "the guy gets the girl" is the happy ending and I thought it totally unnecessary for this particular story.

Rob Instigator 12.01.2014 05:52 PM

 

demonrail666 12.01.2014 06:21 PM

May the Swiss Army Knife be with you.

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 12.01.2014 06:26 PM

Im crawling back under my rock where Star Wars wasn't milked not only to death, but the corpse was fed upon.

!@#$%! 12.01.2014 07:31 PM

 


shallow grave - what a bunch of dicks! the movie was okay.

 


coriolanus - cool as fuck! yes yes, shakespeare with modern weapons has been done before and it may be a cliché of college theatres but in this case it works really well i thought

 


we are the best - 3 swedish girls in the 80s start a punk band. nice movie, at times a little sad, most times hilarious.

 


transporter 2 - good cartoon. cheesy and absurd but good martial arts, flying cars, and psycho gun-toting chicks in lingerie. one thing i learned from this movie is that if someone is shooting at you just turn away!. better than some stallone movie though because there wasn't any evident plastic surgery and the guy doesn't wax his chest.

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 12.01.2014 07:34 PM

I found this a good read and I more or less agreed with it..

http://www.cinelinx.com/movie-stuff/...-prequels.html

Bytor Peltor 12.01.2014 07:35 PM

When I woke up this early afternoon, Mildred Pierce (1945) was coming on. To be honest, I didn't know a thing about the movie, but wanted to watch some because of the SY song......didn't realize Joan Crawford was in it.

 

!@#$%! 12.01.2014 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor
When I woke up this early afternoon, Mildred Pierce (1945) was coming on......didn't realize Joan Crawford was in it.

 


oh, hey, there was a pretty good hbo miniseries of this done a few years ago-- better than the original movie in several ways. todd haynes directed it (there's another SY connection, as he directed some of their videos [eta: disappearer])

SuchFriendsAreDangerous 12.01.2014 07:42 PM

so wait, its not a half baked fantasy of Col. Sherman T. Potter's wife Mildred having an affair with Hawkeye?? SHIT.. I probably should have googled it years ago ;)


 

demonrail666 12.01.2014 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
oh, hey, there was a pretty good hbo miniseries of this done a few years ago-- better than the original movie in several ways. todd haynes directed it (there's another SY connection, as he directed some of their videos [eta: disappearer])


I don't know. I liked the miniseries but Crawford is so perfect in the original that any attempt to remake it without her would be struggling to compete.She defined tht character, almost like an alter-ego.

!@#$%! 12.01.2014 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
I don't know. I liked the miniseries but Crawford is so perfect in the original that any attempt to remake it without her would be struggling to compete.She defined tht character, almost like an alter-ego.


i liked the movie a lot too but when i meant better in several ways (not every way) i was thinking for example of the detailed period reconstruction and the muted color of the cinematography and the detailed novel-like narrative and all kinds of attention to detail in the todd haynes version. more naturalistic, less melodramatic (there's that word again).

both definitely have their merits and i wasn't really declaring the new one better than the original-- but to have remade such a classic, i thought the hbo series justified its existence well-- it wasn't a superfluous piece of work and i think it's better tailored to our audiences today. works kinda like "mad men" looks at the 60s but looking at the 30s, whereas the original didn't need to add a sense of historical perspective because the great depression was a recent thing and everything was sort of a given.

but what the hell is chicken and waffles anyway? i've never eaten that stuff in my life (separate yes, together no).

demonrail666 12.02.2014 05:20 AM

I agree. In turning it into a miniseries they were at least able to concentrate and expand on things the movie couldn't. It's always gonna be difficult when someone's already given such an iconic performance but to Haynes' credit he never even tried to compete on that level. Saying that, while I generally like Kate Winslet I do think she was wrong in that role. Not just cos she wasn't Crawford, it needed someone like ... I dunno ... I was about to say Julianne Moore ... but that'd be me falling into the very trap Haynes did well to avoid, by not trying to find an equivalent to Crawford. Still, Winslet never quite worked for me.

!@#$%! 12.02.2014 09:44 AM

oh i hear that. i sort of have a crush on winslet so i can forgive her pretty much anything ha ha ha (but still i won't watch titanic). still i though she was fantastic in this one if you don't think of crawford. my iconic/imprinted vision of crawford is vienna in "johnny guitar" so she didn't interfere with my imagination in that sense. maybe i saw the series first and that helped? but anyway i love kate winslet--imperfect and adorable. awwww....

 


just read the wikipedia article and it turns out (i didn't know) the movie had to change from the original novel due to the production code whereas the todd haynes version follows the novel very closely. i find veda's fate in the first movie more satisfying though ha ha ha ha ha.

-----------

anyway, last night watched

 


la grande illusion - what a movie!!! (don't watch any trailers because old trailers ruin everything. ) i have no words right now to say how good it was, but it was...! the criterion disc did a great transfer.

demonrail666 12.02.2014 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
just read the wikipedia article and it turns out (i didn't know) the movie had to change from the original novel due to the production code whereas the todd haynes version follows the novel very closely. i find veda's fate in the first movie more satisfying though ha ha ha ha ha.


The Production Code was great. It made directors really work to smuggle their message in, under its radar. That was where Lang was so fantastic

Quote:


la grande illusion - what a movie!!! (don't watch any trailers because old trailers ruin everything. ) i have no words right to say how good it was but it was excellent.

Yeah, brilliant film. Too many great scenes but I love the bit when the POWs spontaneously start to sing La Marseillaise, and when Erich Von Stroheim talks to the French general about their class affinities. Brilliant film by a brilliant filmmaker. Have you seen La regle du jeu?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth