All your punk fashion questions answered here
 

Because there's nothing more 'gnarly' than customising:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFV5WisS8Uw

How many rips should I have in my jeans to be truely rebellious?

Unless Luella Bartley answers them, I'm not interested.

hey. just so you know, I'm not gonna 'answer' your questions. I was just really referring to the youtube thingumy. Besides. anyone whose actually seen me would know that, well, I'm not really qualified.

even you can be a proud punk

It was a joke, I wasn't refering to you at all. And YOU DO look like a punk, in a good way.

I feel misled. I thought you were taking over the "Ask Pookie" mantle, but only answering questions on your specialized subject.

I didn't get a chance to watch this yet, but does it include tips on how to carve "I NEED A FIX" in your chest the best way? (I vote for a safety pin)

That 's ridiculous, the guy talks like an animal reporter. Too serious.
Nice comb...

that's false advertising man!

hahaha ripped jeans are gay.

look at this drug addict


look at this stupid bitch. her jeans ar so riped they are just a belt and butt flap! hulk hogan's daughter

here she is again with the same jeans but different show


now these ripped jeans are gay

I was going to ask, what was the best color to achieve that punk look, but since you are not answering, I will take my questions elsewhere.

punk fashion=oxymoron

Go buy/steal a guitar and make some music/noise and shut the fuck up...fucking youtube dweeb.
I blame Malcolm McLaren.

Punks are so 30 years ago, let alone last season.

It was a joke, dimwit. Joke, you know, like when someone cracks a joke, and you laugh? A joke.

Actually no, punk is so last year.

I wrote a long reply to this and also about the topic of the thread but then I thought that it's not worth it. You're not worth it. Punk!

mary kate olsen, the little troll-like twin from FULL HOUSE TV show


I predicted her and her sister would end up doing incest rimjob porno, and she looks to be getting close!

The perrenial problem with punk is that the people who made punk often looked the shit while the people who listen to punk look shit.

I am aware that the Pistols (who looked the shit) were not the first punk band. I am also aware that the Ramones, the Stooges, most garage bands, VU and, if you want to take liberties with punk (as people invariably do), Woody Guthrie looked the shit.

I have a theory that the main difference between a punk band and a hardcore band is whether or not you look the shit. Because most hardcore bands (except Refused and a couple of others [blah blah shape of punk isn't really hardcore blah blah]) look like a bunch of turds wiped on the loo roll of popular consciousness.

So, my question:

Dear Mr Rail,

I have a piercing in my forehead; are rings or studs in this year?

Yours,

Patrick O'Dentist.