![]() |
Is Kid A an innovative album?
I imagine that only timorous ears will feel like saying that it is.Poll on the way for this most overrated of semi-adventurous records.
|
I think it is.
At least I don't know what "timorous" means. |
Meaning of timorous (adjective)
lacking courage; timid |
Kid A is bogus
|
haha.I meant to vote no but i voted yes instead.Yorken has cast a spell on me.
|
i dont know about innovative, but i did enjoy the album
|
Its a good album, but not as innovative as many are lead to believe. The only reason it is considered innovative is that a mainstream artist like Radiohead made it, but other artists had been doing electronic experimentations a long time before. Check out: Paul Lansky, Parmigiani, Edgar Varese, among others.
|
Quote:
Yes, that's how I meant it when I voted 'yes'. For sure there was a number of artists that were producing far more experimental electronic stuff long time before Kid A, but considering Radiohead as a mainstream band, releasing a record like that was quite a corageous step. |
It wasn't even that 'expiremental'. It was good but not innovative at all really.
|
Innovative is the wrong word. It was remarkably brave. The experiment was in taking an album like that to a mass market and seeing if it sold. A valuable exercise in itself.
|
As i said in another thread : i really like Kid-a, but there's no way it's an "innovative" or "groundbreaking" album if you consider it from a wide perspective. It's surely "innovative" for radiohead because it marked a significant change in their sound and writing method, considering they were hailed like a "guitar band" or wathever they were labeled, you know what i mean, don't you?
|
It is a very innovative album. Definitely an innovation in sucking pseudo-intellectual mainstreamers cocks!
|
Quote:
yep. I really enjoy it myself, probably my favorite radiohead album. But I know it wasn't exactly anything new as it was what everyone else said. |
in radioheads history it is deff an innovative album. in general - i dont think so.
radiohead is waaaaaay too much overrated. |
Quote:
You took the words right out of my mouth. |
Quote:
|
it is an innovative album because you all are fucking sheep for believing it isnt. Everytime i hear it isnt innovative its just some faggot whos thinks that aphex twin is fucking god. I never heard as good as music as Kid A's. Apex twin can blow me, he never made any music sound as nearly as good. Yes its fucking innovative........
people get too wrapped up about if its innovative or that original. take it for what it is. great music. dont tell me the first time you listened to it you shot it down for not being innovative enough, thats fucking retarded |
It's a good pop album. Within a certain context, it, and they, is/are quite innovative. A guitar band making a consistently good album? That's quite innovative. For anyone with a cursory awareness of... well, just about the entire history of rock/ 'other' music, it's not terribly innovative.
But promotional rhetoric is a different language to the one most people speak. I saw an advert for Damien Rice's new album the other day. They said, "the most influential musician of his generation". Bullshit, obviously, but within the promo-speak lexicon that's a fair assessment. Genuinely innovative albums though? I can think of a few, but they are incredibly few and far between. In the last ten years I would say the only genuinely innovative music I've heard has been from Taku Sugimoto, and I can't stand that. For my money, the likes of Haino/ NNCK/ Otomo Yoshihide/ Philip Jeck aren't necessarily innovative, but they are incredibly good. |
Fags embraced disco before Yorke did,just remember.
Greetings from a faggish future |
i hope you know i dont use "faggot" or "gays" to refer to homosexuals, i could care less what sexuality someone is...
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth