Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonic Sounds (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   The Flaming Lips Vs. Sonic Youth (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=12156)

screamingskull 04.12.2007 01:34 PM

The Flaming Lips Vs. Sonic Youth
 
Who’s better, not who’s your favourite, but who is the better band?



Sonic Youth are my favourite band, they have been for 5 years and they probably always will be, but I do think that the flaming lips are a better band. I have seen them both live, I own all the albums both bands have put out and I think as they started around the same time (1981-83) they can be compared quite nicely.
The Flaming Lips have put out 11 albums in 24 years, Sonic Youth 17 albums in 26 years (22 albums if you include the SYR’s). But where as the Flaming Lip’s albums seem to be consistently great! Sonic Youth seem to be more hit and miss for me, Take their most recent albums Rather Ripped and At War With The Mystics, I prefer at war with the mystics to be honest, It has some fantastic songs on it and even the songs in between the fantastic ones are great. There really is not a song on that album that I don’t like. Rather Ripped is a good album, it’s a little to polished and clean and poppy for my taste, but I did love Murray Street.
Maybe its because the Flaming Lips take lots of time to put out an album? They took 4 years to do At War With The Mystics and 3 Years to do Yoshimi. Where as SY do an album every 2 years as it seems.
The Flaming Lips have had a lot of different band members, but have stayed the same since 1996, I think the influence of these other musicians has helped them to grow and change as a band, if you were to listen to Hit to death in the future head then Clouds Taste Metallic then Yoshimi you wouldn’t think it was the same band, Their sound has changed, it hasn’t gotten better as it was already amazing!, its just changed and I love it.
Sonic Youth have had the same line up since 1986, Thurston, Kim and Lee are all hugely creative people that have not only put out sonic youth albums but also done their own side projects, something the flaming lips haven’t. But Sonic Youth have just cleaned up for me, their sound has gotten slicker cleaner and tighter. They can put as much feedback as they want on Rather Ripped but it still comes out sounding slick because its been recorded on fantastic equipment.
When Sonic Youth do a good song its REALLY REALLY good, but how often does that happen now? It’s like the Flaming Lips are consistently a 7/10 and Sonic Youth can write an album that has two 10/10 songs on it and the rest are 4/10. So maybe the flaming lips are better at writing albums and sonic youth are better at writing songs. Sonic youth are past their best now, its hard to admit that, but they are, they were at their best in the late 1980’s. That when they could write a REALLY REALLY good album.
Live the flamings lips are the most amazing thing in the world, they really try hard, and it pays off, its like going to the most amazing church service ever, Wayne speaks his gospel and you come out a changed person. They play the songs the fans want to hear and make it an interactive fun time! I don’t think I have ever had more fun than at a flaming lips gig.
 

 

Sonic Youth are a good live band, I wouldn’t put them in my top 5 live bands. some bands are just good live like the Brian Jonestown Massacre. When sonic youth play a song live that I know really really well I am always disappointed at it doesn’t sound exactly the same. For the flaming lips a lot of the songs are now created on a keyboard so they are easier to play exactly like the sound on the album, for Sonic Youth the songs are so layered and harder to play live harder to recreate. I could talk about how influential both bands have been and I think Sonic Youth would win that contest but I have already written enough.

This is just my opinion, Sonic Youth are still my favourite band because like I said, when they are good they are really really good. But I think the Flaming Lips are the better band.

Discuss.

Rob Instigator 04.12.2007 01:42 PM

i WISH i COULD VOTE A billion TIMES FOR THE SHEER GENIUS OF SONIC YOUTH AGAINST TE PSYCHEDELICALLY EMBELLISHED CLASSIC ROCK OF THE FLAMING LIPS!

Trasher02 04.12.2007 01:43 PM

I don't really like the flaming lips so I voted for SY.
However when I saw sy they were quite boring (probably because they only played RR songs) so I do get your point.

Savage Clone 04.12.2007 01:43 PM

I am happy for the success the Flaming Lips have had, but truthfully I have not enjoyed any of their music starting with The Soft Bulletin. Too sugary for me. I loved them in the early and mid 90s though.

Rob Instigator 04.12.2007 01:44 PM

sonic youth make skronk. me likey skronk. me love skronk.

SynthethicalY 04.12.2007 01:45 PM

I haven't really listened to the flaming lips to vote on this.

atari 2600 04.12.2007 01:45 PM

Well, I only just liked 'em in the early to mid '90s
as they were never worthy of my love at any point.

This thread is gettin' crazy with the cheez-whiz...
a little too cuckoo for cocoa puffs for my tastes.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 01:48 PM

 

me in the Statue of Liberty crown at the front seeing the Flaming Lips, i feel sorry for you if you cannot see the genius of the flaming lips!

gmku 04.12.2007 02:10 PM

I've only recently picked up on the Flaming Lips. While I like them, I don't think they have quite the range of artistic ideas as Sonic Youth. My nod goes to SY, but just barely. It's a slight nod. So slight, in fact, that if you were not watching for it, you might miss my nod.

Rob Instigator 04.12.2007 02:14 PM

I enjoy their music but innterms of MUSIC and musical ideas, sonic youth takes the cake like a motherfucker. in terms of live shows, I prefer just people with instruments and no extraneous shit. The Lips, like Phish, put on fantastic live shows, for the acid eaters in the crowd, and while that is appreciated, it is nothing more than the shit madonna does in concerts with 20 dancers and set pieces and stage craft.
pompous rock stage shows nearly killed rock before punk came around.

drrrtyboots 04.12.2007 03:01 PM

FL put on a fancy show but SY got da soul.

youthoftomorrow 04.12.2007 03:19 PM

it's pretty close. FLs are great, but SY wins.

the REALLY close one for me is SY or Lightning Bolt.

drrrtyboots 04.12.2007 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youthoftomorrow
it's pretty close. FLs are great, but SY wins.

the REALLY close one for me is SY or Lightning Bolt.

LB better live show hands down. At least these days. SY is obviously past their prime as far as performances go. Crowds have gotten worse and worse, everyone just stands still with little or no movement for the entire set. LB on the other hand, if you're not dancing when they're playing you shouldn't be there.

cryptowonderdruginvogue 04.12.2007 03:25 PM

i like them both, i prefer sonic youth though

jon boy 04.12.2007 03:30 PM

sonic youth. they have just created more moments of amazingness for me.

val-holla-ing 04.12.2007 03:30 PM

the flaming lips bore me. sy wins.

youthoftomorrow 04.12.2007 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drrrtyboots
LB better live show hands down.


agreed. i saw them last weekend; best show i've ever been to.

when it comes to records, though, the Youth have an advantage through numbers; they just have more amazing records than LB (Wonderful Rainbow, Hypermagic Mountain vs. EVOL, Sister, DDN, WM, Nurse, etc.), so i'm not going to pass judgement on that yet.

Torn Curtain 04.12.2007 04:16 PM

SY.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 04:27 PM

did anyone even read any of what i wrote??? i think Rob might have.

Rob Instigator 04.12.2007 04:47 PM

hell yeah I read what you wrote.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 04:57 PM

i'm glad somebody did! i wanted to have an actual discussion, not just people replying with comments like "sonic youth rule man"

atari 2600 04.12.2007 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screamingskull
i'm glad somebody did! i wanted to have an actual discussion, not just people replying with comments like "sonic youth rule man"


...yet you start a thread that is a poll between Sonic Youth and The Flaming Lips.

Why not just start a Flaming Lips thread?
Or better still, here's a score of other threads (a few of which you started as erstwhile resident The Flaming Lips proponent):
http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/sea...earchid=502488
Why aren't people utilizing the working search function?
Multiple Vonnegut RIP threads are just the tip of the negligent iceberg here.

You fired the first shot on this SY Message Board with this particular "versus thread" and then you complain as you have in the post above?
What sort of reality are you living in exactly?

It's my feeling that a more desired result (with differing opinions and some discourse) might be attained if you posted this topic at, say, www.rateyourmusic.com.

I mean, despite your own idiosyncratic personal preference* for them,
The Flaming Lips cannot hang with Sonic Youth!

Don't make me laugh!

'Cause they have a few alternately-tuned guitar sounds, you say?

pfft.

*Look, even The Flaming Lips themselves would most likely concede defeat to Sonic Youth's greatness, although I'm certain they would be most flattered to learn that you thought of them so highly.

fugazifan 04.12.2007 06:22 PM

i like the flips music, but i dont listen to it nearly as often as sonic youth. plus i have 22 original (and three on my comp, maybe more...) sy album and only two original and am familiar with two more flip albums. im not really psyched about getting another fluip album. on the other hanfd the lips put on a brilliant show. i saw em a week after sy in boston and they blew me away. the sonic youtrh show was sublime and i gottoo meet them. but something about the pure joy and happines, spirituality of the flaming lips live, made it a really speacial show for me...

Everyneurotic 04.12.2007 06:41 PM

ok, here goes:

i don't like this "better band" kinda discussion because they are pointless, there's no better or worse, just opinions and likes, so it boils down to your "favorite" bands, in reality.

that said, i do agree with you that i feel at war with the mystics is a stronger album than rather ripped, and yes, it seems the case since they spent more time on it than sy with rr; having seen sy play the rr songs a couple of months ago, i feel they should have waited a little to develope them more, as the live counterparts are much experimental, instrumentally better and even noisier with more improv, which i felt made the album feel incomplete.

however, i think that a band that can't sustain a firm line up are bound to produce weaker music than a band with a solid, constant line up, i don't think sy are hit or miss, as you said, i think they are pretty great at what they do and it's because their line up. sure, rather ripped is not stellar but it's still great for simple, direct pop rock album, and they are also experimental, whether the flaming lips go thru phases, (depending on who's on the line up perhaps?) and move marginally within them; also, my guess is that, since there are big gaps in between albums, they seem to be moving in giant steps in their evolution since we can't grasp what happens in those in between years.

both bands are really different, though. sy come from the jazz, minimalism and blues tradition where instrumentalism is the key to their existance, they are here to play, experiment and come up with something new, out of thin air in some cases. the flaming lips, on the other hand, have always been songwriters first and foremost, they are really good at creating these great narrating epic songs built from unlike elements (feedback and guitar skronk early on, samplers and strings lately), they are also incredibly good at incorporating lots of influences into their music and make it their own (like brian wilson and burt bacharach on the soft bulletin or yes and pink floyd on at war with the mystics); yes, sy are also songwriters, but that's not their nature as a group, in fact, songwriting was/is another way for them to experiment.

and about the live front, i haven't seen the lips live so i can't tell. they seem like fun but i find even the best theatrical concerts to be off putting, there's something dumb about props, pyro and costumes at rock concerts, i don't know, i don't like the blue man group or cirque du soleil, i guess i don't like seeing a band pull that while playing songs. whether sonic youth are a raw, sweaty, feedback-drenched punk fest of songs and improvisation, they are a band playing songs live, not a light and sound stage show that could be staged on broadway or las vegas. it's rock n' roll.

atari 2600 04.12.2007 07:01 PM

I went to see Deerhoof open for them last year and left two songs into The Flaming Lips' set...as I predicted I would.

I saw them do The Soft Bulletin live at the 40 Watt and maybe that was a bad one to see first.

As such, I am puzzled by all this "they're great live" jabber.

If I must score something for The Flaming Lips, I will say that my friend Andrew thinks more highly of them than I. He was at the same show and loved it.

But that's all neither-here-or-there to an extent.

Let's go by what we know a bit, shall we?

The Flaming Lips' "Death Valley '69," while not atrocious, is also fairly feeble. I'd venture to say it's on par with what, say, Wilco (in their own way), could come up with if they attempted it. The studio version by Sonic Youth of this song (not my favorite, by any means) beats out most hypothetical comers who try to cover it. And the live version(s) of "Death Valley '69"?
Forget about it...there's never gonna be a another band that can do that...ever.

On the other hand, Sonic Youth could cover any The Flaming Lips song and although it may not sound (in some cases) like the song, it would be a better version in the majority of cases, I would imagine.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
...yet you start a thread that is a poll between Sonic Youth and The Flaming Lips.
Why not just start a Flaming Lips thread?
Or better still, here's a score of other threads (a few of which you started as erstwhile resident The Flaming Lips proponent):
http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/sea...earchid=502488

that link doesn't work, and there are already plenty of Flaming Lips threads if i wanted to talk just about them then i would post on those threads, i wanted to talk about the flaming lips Vs Sonic Youth.
Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
You fired the first shot on this SY Message Board with this particular "versus thread" and then you complain as you have in the post above?
What sort of reality are you living in exactly?

so i cannot have a discussion about the flaming lips' work vs. sonic youth's because god forbid someone might like the flaming lips more. God why do you have to be such an asshole, I hated you on the old message board with all your stupid arguing over the lemonheads and i hate you on here too. You don't seem to be able to let someone else have an opinion that differs from yours or to be able to even have a civil discussion with them about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
It's my feeling that a more desired result (with differing opinions and some discourse) might be attained if you posted this topic at, say, www.rateyourmusic.com.
I mean, despite your own idiosyncratic personal preference* for them,
The Flaming Lips cannot hang with Sonic Youth!
Don't make me laugh!
'Cause they have a few alternately-tuned guitar sounds, you say?
pfft.


i don't think i need to answer this, you sound like an asshole enough here for me to not have to call you one.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
i do agree with you that i feel at war with the mystics is a stronger album than rather ripped, and yes, it seems the case since they spent more time on it than sy with rr; having seen sy play the rr songs a couple of months ago, i feel they should have waited a little to develope them more, as the live counterparts are much experimental, instrumentally better and even noisier with more improv, which i felt made the album feel incomplete.

i agree with this completely, i think the flaming lips give the songs time to develop and work on them, where as sonic youth maybe don't as much.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
however, i think that a band that can't sustain a firm line up are bound to produce weaker music than a band with a solid, constant line up, i don't think sy are hit or miss, as you said, i think they are pretty great at what they do and it's because their line up. sure, rather ripped is not stellar but it's still great for simple, direct pop rock album, and they are also experimental, whether the flaming lips go thru phases, (depending on who's on the line up perhaps?) and move marginally within them; also, my guess is that, since there are big gaps in between albums, they seem to be moving in giant steps in their evolution since we can't grasp what happens in those in between years.


but can't that be a good thing? if every album is in a new direction and exploring new territory for the band and it sounds as good as it does then i don't see a problem.

screamingskull 04.12.2007 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
Let's go by what we know a bit, shall we?
The Flaming Lips' "Death Valley '69," while not atrocious, is also fairly feeble. I'd venture to say it's on par with what, say, Wilco (in their own way), could come up with if they attempted it. The studio version by Sonic Youth of this song (not my favorite, by any means) beats out most hypothetical comers who try to cover it. And the live version(s) of "Death Valley '69"?
Forget about it...there's never gonna be a another band that can do that...ever.On the other hand, Sonic Youth could cover any The Flaming Lips song and although it may not sound (in some cases) like the song, it would be a better version in the majority of cases, I would imagine.


nope don't agree with any of this. Basically you don't like the flaming lips so why you are commenting in this thread i don't know? Yes you have the right to and yes i wanted a discussion but its pretty pointless to have a discussion about who the better band is with someone who hates one of the bands you are talking about. Don't you think? So why didn't i start this thread somewhere else? well because i know that there are Flaming Lips fans on here, people i could actually have a real discussion with. So i really don't see why you bothered to reply in the detail that you did, it was pointless no?

floatingslowly 04.12.2007 08:37 PM

sonic youth imo.

atari 2600 04.12.2007 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screamingskull
nope don't agree with any of this. Basically you don't like the flaming lips so why you are commenting in this thread i don't know? Yes you have the right to and yes i wanted a discussion but its pretty pointless to have a discussion about who the better band is with someone who hates one of the bands you are talking about. Don't you think? So why didn't i start this thread somewhere else? well because i know that there are Flaming Lips fans on here, people i could actually have a real discussion with. So i really don't see why you bothered to reply in the detail that you did, it was pointless no?


You're still harping on this "discussion" nonsense...

If you wanted that, then start a thread about The Flaming Lips

&

not

The Flaming Lips Vs. Sonic Youth

duh

RdTv 04.12.2007 09:23 PM

The bottom line is the Flaming Lips (by Wayne Coyne & Michael Ivans own admission) had no creativity and/or musical direction and then Stephen Drozd stepped in the picture and started to write everything and all the music became like bowie/ny dolls/overproduced/smoke and mirrors. The band has gone on record saying this, OK? Therefore The Flaming Lips are a fluke, a joke that has merely lasted this long, am I saying their music or shows are horrible, no, I'm simply saying they have done nothing special or noteworthy. OK, so their shows are probably the most visually stimulating exsperience you can have whilst attending a concert, but that doesn't make up for the over-production and sense of sugar coating the music gives you, especially the new album, save for 3 songs.

Sonic Youth has spawned countless and countless and countless imitators and inspired a legion of people around the world. Their music is built on creativity, substance and excitement, yes even the newer stuff. So, maybe the shows are less visually oriented, but thats because they are better musicians and don't need costumes and glitter to attract people.

the bottom line: SY=,originality,creativity,high quality, substance
Flaming Lips=production,effects,over the top,indie-pop

atari 2600 04.12.2007 10:24 PM

ew ew

oh

I got it

this thread should have been called:

"The Flaming Lips & Sonic Youth/compare & contrast"

oodsoodfmasd;lkjowej top
2 po35u25v-01285

Everyneurotic 04.12.2007 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screamingskull
...

but can't that be a good thing? if every album is in a new direction and exploring new territory for the band and it sounds as good as it does then i don't see a problem.


i meant that both are different bands, and as i stated first and foremost on my post, you can't say one is better than the other without it being an opinion. so, the flaming lips have phases instead of concious experimental attempts, that's their m.o., and it's a good thing, sy are different, and they mostly make it work.

...screamingskull: you should remember that the vast majority of fl fans from before the soft bulletin think the band doesn't play good music anymore, which boils down to opinions...myself, my favorites are priest driven ambulance and soft bulletin.

floatingslowly 04.12.2007 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RdTv
The bottom line is the Flaming Lips (by Wayne Coyne & Michael Ivans own admission) had no creativity and/or musical direction and then Stephen Drozd stepped in the picture and started to write everything and all the music became like bowie/ny dolls/overproduced/smoke and mirrors.


although I agree with the latter half of what you say, that is a completely unfair statement.

no creativity? If Wayne ever said that, he would have been lying or playing it up for the interview. the guy's chock full of it. I'm not sure how much of it's on the music right now...but it's there and always has been.

musically, Steven changed the band's sound. whether that's good or bad can be debated, but it finally made them successful.

say what you want about them now, just don't go dissing their entire career like that man! :p

BACK ON TOPIC: I'd vote for sonic youth twice in this poll if I could.

ZEROpumpkins 04.13.2007 12:10 AM

Soft bulletin is more overrated than Nevermind. There, I said it.

hey alex 04.13.2007 01:26 AM

I read most of page one earlier- and skimmed page two- here;s my change on the subject.


Someone brought that trying to decide who's better of the two is dumb- in so few words- and i agree--- but i'll also lay my prefereance to sonic youth. Reason why is that i just like them more and i can feel a more artistic drive within them. Even with the mediocrity of, let's say, rather ripped, you had the band doing what they do- playing rock'n'roll tunes to fulfill contractual obligation. The F'Lips tho-- and let me say I love them, priest driven ambulane and up thru yoshimi i can always get, at least, a smile to cross me. Mystics,not so much- but that's just becuase it comes off stale to me. Not to cay they've lost their touch, but just suggesting that were working under the idea 'hey people like our wierd noises- let's make an album of wierd noises and make the songs as we go along'-- while this isn't always a bad notion (i myself in my small 4-trackin ways have thought about what sounds should come bfore songs)i''ve always weighed them equally. Not to put myself in abetter position than Wayne 'n' crew- Even I'll admit i havent made anything as moving as priest driven ambulance (maybe i'm on my way tho).



IN short and mayb enot having much connection with my ramble- If i had to choose i'd go with SY- the shows may be smaller scale and sometimes the albums and songs can bring you down down down- but with the Flaming Lips i get a dry feeling- no desert '69- just the feeling i might've heard this before--- if band flying a hot-air PIG outside a factory were in the game today- y'knoe?

hey alex 04.13.2007 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swa(y)
and why do people feel the need to constantly rank sonic youth with all these 80's indie shit rock bands?

i mean...they are something totally different.

but couldn;t you imagine the magic---


dokken youth, brother.
dokken youth.

SonikJesus 04.13.2007 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screamingskull
Who’s better, not who’s your favourite, but who is the better band?



Sonic Youth are my favourite band, they have been for 5 years and they probably always will be, but I do think that the flaming lips are a better band. I have seen them both live, I own all the albums both bands have put out and I think as they started around the same time (1981-83) they can be compared quite nicely.
The Flaming Lips have put out 11 albums in 24 years, Sonic Youth 17 albums in 26 years (22 albums if you include the SYR’s). But where as the Flaming Lip’s albums seem to be consistently great! Sonic Youth seem to be more hit and miss for me, Take their most recent albums Rather Ripped and At War With The Mystics, I prefer at war with the mystics to be honest, It has some fantastic songs on it and even the songs in between the fantastic ones are great. There really is not a song on that album that I don’t like. Rather Ripped is a good album, it’s a little to polished and clean and poppy for my taste, but I did love Murray Street.
Maybe its because the Flaming Lips take lots of time to put out an album? They took 4 years to do At War With The Mystics and 3 Years to do Yoshimi. Where as SY do an album every 2 years as it seems.
The Flaming Lips have had a lot of different band members, but have stayed the same since 1996, I think the influence of these other musicians has helped them to grow and change as a band, if you were to listen to Hit to death in the future head then Clouds Taste Metallic then Yoshimi you wouldn’t think it was the same band, Their sound has changed, it hasn’t gotten better as it was already amazing!, its just changed and I love it.
Sonic Youth have had the same line up since 1986, Thurston, Kim and Lee are all hugely creative people that have not only put out sonic youth albums but also done their own side projects, something the flaming lips haven’t. But Sonic Youth have just cleaned up for me, their sound has gotten slicker cleaner and tighter. They can put as much feedback as they want on Rather Ripped but it still comes out sounding slick because its been recorded on fantastic equipment.
When Sonic Youth do a good song its REALLY REALLY good, but how often does that happen now? It’s like the Flaming Lips are consistently a 7/10 and Sonic Youth can write an album that has two 10/10 songs on it and the rest are 4/10. So maybe the flaming lips are better at writing albums and sonic youth are better at writing songs. Sonic youth are past their best now, its hard to admit that, but they are, they were at their best in the late 1980’s. That when they could write a REALLY REALLY good album.
Live the flamings lips are the most amazing thing in the world, they really try hard, and it pays off, its like going to the most amazing church service ever, Wayne speaks his gospel and you come out a changed person. They play the songs the fans want to hear and make it an interactive fun time! I don’t think I have ever had more fun than at a flaming lips gig.



 




 

Sonic Youth are a good live band, I wouldn’t put them in my top 5 live bands. some bands are just good live like the Brian Jonestown Massacre. When sonic youth play a song live that I know really really well I am always disappointed at it doesn’t sound exactly the same. For the flaming lips a lot of the songs are now created on a keyboard so they are easier to play exactly like the sound on the album, for Sonic Youth the songs are so layered and harder to play live harder to recreate. I could talk about how influential both bands have been and I think Sonic Youth would win that contest but I have already written enough.

This is just my opinion, Sonic Youth are still my favourite band because like I said, when they are good they are really really good. But I think the Flaming Lips are the better band.

Discuss.


I haven't gotten into the Flaming Lips yet but I disagree with you on some points. I don't think their album are hit-or-miss. Everyone is always saying how great 80's SY is; like if everything they did after that was never as great. Don't get me wrong, I love 80's SY but they still kept putting out great records after that. Records like Washing Machine and A Thousand Leaves as well as others contain a lot of amazing songs. To me, SY keeps getting better with age. Sonic Nurse is my favorite SY record and it's pretty recent. The only records that I wasn't so amazed by are EJSTNS and RR. They aren't bad records, they are just average to me.

You also said that you prefer the Lips' live shows because the songs sound as they do on the album because they are done mostly on keyboards. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to go to a show to hear songs that sound like they do on the album. There is no point.

I agree with you about SY not spending so much time on their records but that is just how they write them. They get together every two years and get songs together. I personally don't think SY needs to spend more time writing their records.

SYRFox 04.13.2007 02:46 AM

I don't like Flaming Lips. Can't say why, maybe because it's too "symphonic" for me, but I just can't enjoy them

ZEROpumpkins 04.13.2007 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swa(y)
overrated like pavement, huh?


Nope, I don't find Pavement overrated. Wowee Zowee is underrated IMO.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth