Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonic Sounds (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Which Side of the Pond has Better Music? (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=15564)

SynthethicalY 08.16.2007 01:39 AM

Which Side of the Pond has Better Music?
 
So where do you think innovative music is being made right now? I just want to know so I can have some pointers.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 01:49 AM

right now it's hard to say. one really good band that i'm pretty sure are from england (at least the singer is) is thee heavenly music association.
i'll upload their album in awhile.

SpectralJulianIsNotDead 08.16.2007 01:55 AM

I think it is pretty equal. Some of my favorite bands are from England, but some of my favorite bands are also from the US. It seems 50/50 to me.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 02:04 AM

led zeppelin blatantly ripped off from american blues artists, the stones are a different story. they eventually cultivated their own sound, not necessarily based on the old blues (like zeppelin did) but i guess influenced by it more or less. their early work is obviously influenced by all that old stuff, but later on they kind of came into their own. am i making myself clear enough? the stones sound like...the stones. zeppelin sound more like rip offs. not to say that they weren't good because i do like them.

atsonicpark 08.16.2007 02:10 AM

basically, almost everything that's "the best" comes from japan (I'm not a Japan freak, and I hate a lot of things about their culture; but technology- and entertainment-wise, they got it down)... so yeah, the best music also comes from japan... I mean, their normal "rock" bands over their are what we call "math rock" here! And just check out their ele ctronic music there.. wow.. Japan has so many forward-thinking and downright brilliant bands it's not even funny.. England has also always been great for electronic music... so, indeed, "that side" of the pond is the best..

SynthethicalY 08.16.2007 02:16 AM

I do think England has better Electronica music.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swa(y)
i agree with ya. the stones most def. created their own sound (i think zep did too, but im not even going to attempt defending that one cause i totally understand how it would be easy to dissagree with me), but i dont think they woulda been shit if they woulda started out as a band doing that sorta sound. the brits WANTED to hear the blues. thats why they freaked out when hendriz went over their, he was embraced over their as being a "real american bluesman", to where as here in the US, the "real american bluesman" didnt acknowledge him as such. least, most of them didnt.

thats one things thats awesome about them over there though, they seem to embrace new/innovative stuff before we do. however, the stuff they are ussualy embracing more or less comes from here. a band from america attempting to "create a new sound" or whatever, probablly has a far better chance of making it in england before he does in the united states (that includes new york...and of course, depends on ones intepretation on what "making it as a band" actually means).

"making it" is pretty hard to define because if you know the right people it's not that difficult to get a record out, however, it is difficult to get enough press and promotion to actually sell enough copies and tour successfully enough to make any money.

atsonicpark 08.16.2007 02:18 AM

also, japan has better dolls, right canta?

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark
also, japan has better dolls, right canta?

england has come out with some pretty cool shit in that department (in the 50s they made extremely creepy looking rubber babydolls..) but yeah. japan has a lot to offer in my opinion.

k-krack 08.16.2007 02:24 AM

This side.

davenotdead 08.16.2007 02:30 AM

 


Ive gotta say USA and I dont think its as close as everyone here is making it out to be...no offense to the brits, theyve made some dandy tunes...but in terms of absolutely unique artists that will most likely never be replicated, its USA in spades...and no, this is not a "who's made better electronica" thread.

SynthethicalY 08.16.2007 02:32 AM

I agree with you dave, as unique artist, the U.S. have made more than the brits.

Norma J 08.16.2007 02:39 AM

I like music from all over the world. I could care less which country with similar population produces the most hits or whatever.

davenotdead 08.16.2007 02:39 AM

yeah...bob dylan, captain beefheart, all our jazz and folk i think will never be equaled...and then even regarding modern artists, i dont think the brits have as many that stand out as america, and they dont have any boredoms or any one "superpower" that i can think of to help even it out...

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 02:47 AM

i forgot to mention:
we here in america have a band full of ugly jewish men that spits blood and fire.
 

sonicl 08.16.2007 02:49 AM

I vote for UK, US, Germany, Italy, Japan and Australia, all in equal measures.

America does lead a lot of trends, but without necessarily being innovative.

_slavo_ 08.16.2007 02:54 AM

The BARDO POND.

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:04 AM

Just to go off-topic a little: Is ANYONE actually being all that innovative in music these days? Most "new" music these days is rehashing or modernising music from the late 1960s (folk), mid 1970s (noise/industrial), or early 1980s (post-punk/no wave). There doesn't seem to be anything going on that is totally without precedent.

fugazifan 08.16.2007 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous
i forgot to mention:
we here in america have a band full of ugly jewish men that spits blood and fire.




 

i belive that only two are jewish:cool:
but, maybe not with those who spit blood and fire, but there are plenty of american bands with ugly jewish men. so if thats all it takes, we should win by a landlide...:D

http://www.guarnieri.com/motorcity/E...0Garfunkel.jpg



 

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fugazifan
i belive that only two are jewish:cool:
but, maybe not with those who spit blood and fire, but there are plenty of american bands with ugly jewish men. so if thats all it takes, we should win by a landlide...:D
http://www.guarnieri.com/motorcity/E...0Garfunkel.jpg

 

do david lee roth and art garfunkel spit fire or blood? i think not.
not to mention that kiss wins by a landslide just because paul stanley is possibly the ugliest man on the planet.

SynthethicalY 08.16.2007 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonicl
Just to go off-topic a little: Is ANYONE actually being all that innovative in music these days? Most "new" music these days is rehashing or modernising music from the late 1960s (folk), mid 1970s (noise/industrial), or early 1980s (post-punk/no wave). There doesn't seem to be anything going on that is totally without precedent.


That is a good question, but isn't also rehashing an old idea, and making it better or adding a twist, innovative?

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:08 AM

But I'm not sure that I do see any adding of twists. Using new technology, maybe, but no twisting.

SynthethicalY 08.16.2007 03:09 AM

I see, in your opinion which artist is the closest?

fugazifan 08.16.2007 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonicl
Just to go off-topic a little: Is ANYONE actually being all that innovative in music these days? Most "new" music these days is rehashing or modernising music from the late 1960s (folk), mid 1970s (noise/industrial), or early 1980s (post-punk/no wave). There doesn't seem to be anything going on that is totally without precedent.

here is a better question, has anybody ever been really innovative then? is there one band that totally reinvented music by making a sound that has no predecessors?
cause even in the 60's, and 70's and 80's, the music that was brilliants, came from somewhere else.
as stravinsky said (paraphrasing)
in order to innovate one must take the old, and make it new....
i cannot think of one band who's sound came from completely out of the blue...

fugazifan 08.16.2007 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous
do david lee roth and art garfunkel spit fire or blood? i think not.
not to mention that kiss wins by a landslide just because paul stanley is possibly the ugliest man on the planet.

thats true (although gene simmons is worse):D

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SynthethicalY
I see, in your opinion which artist is the closest?

You want a current artist that stops me in my tracks and makes me think, "Wow, I've never heard anything like that before"? I'm going to have to take some time to think about that. I'll tell you later - probably much later.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fugazifan
thats true (although gene simmons is worse):D

he has a cute son though
and i still think paul stanley is way uglier than gene simmons by virtue of the fact that he is just not normal looking.

sarramkrop 08.16.2007 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norma J
I like music from all over the world. I could care less which country with similar population produces the most hits or whatever.


My thoughts, exactly.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:15 AM

if this is gonna turn into a serious discussion i'm going to have to agree with norma j and porky. there is good music everywhere.

davenotdead 08.16.2007 03:26 AM

hell na, let's not get all peaceful now...this is straight up GB vs. USA.

Norma J 08.16.2007 03:37 AM

and you live in Australia.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:38 AM

paix!
who wants to touch my silky blonde hair?

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:39 AM

I'd rather touch a British girl's silky blonde hair. British haircare products are so much better than American.

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonicl
I'd rather touch a British girl's silky blonde hair. British haircare products are so much better than American.

bitch! VO5 is the greatest product mankind has ever seen.
 

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:41 AM

It's not very innovative though, is it?

Cantankerous 08.16.2007 03:42 AM

no. it's been wearing the same damn outfit for 30 years.
and it can't play guitar for shit.

sonicl 08.16.2007 03:48 AM

Here, have some rep, and we'll call it quits, okay? I need to try to concentrate on my work for a bit.

pbradley 08.16.2007 03:54 AM

Naturally I am slightly biased to American music since I was born on the continent but I don't know if it is any better than British tunes. Sure I know many of the big name British bands that make it over the sea but I assume there are many amazing lesser known Brit groups that I don't have the means of learning about. Strangely enough, the internet helps me learn more about American bands than British (shitty American bands are more likely to exploit myspace to broadcast their ear poison?). I guess what I'm saying is the buffer between myself and good British music is a relatively thick one which makes me want to answer "I don't know." I'm very aware of how buffers on music can both emphasize great bands as well as overlook great bands. It's the nature of all mainstream/underground dynamics and the British dynamic is made even more suspicious because of the Atlantic Ocean and all things associated.

So the answer is "I don't know" followed quickly with "I don't really care."

Glice 08.16.2007 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbradley
So the answer is "I don't know" followed quickly with "I don't really care."


Yes, this answer is the right one I'm sure.

With regards sonicl's question: Innovation is where you find it, methinks. I'm still reeling from Kaija Sariaaho personally, and Xenakis still blows a lot of things out of the water. Spectralism isn't the only 'new' movement of the last 30 years or so, but it's a good 'un. Haco's bugscape is a pretty brilliant record, and I'm not sure anyone else is doing things like that, but then someone else might listen to it and not hear what I hear. Unfortunately, much as it pains me, the early lower-case improvisers were pretty radical (Sugimoto/ Malfatti), but from that side of things it's only really Nmpereign that interest me. Also, Vault by Wastell/ Mattin threw me off quite a bit, there's not many records doing that sort of thing. And Xasthur/ Nortt blew me away last year. Again though, one man's 'radical music' is another man's tepid bollocks, as we saw with NNCK at ATP.

atsonicpark 08.16.2007 04:58 AM

Well, I live in America, too, but I can't be biased when it comes to pleasuring my ears... I don't think there's anything here that isn't PROBABLY being done better in Japan. I mean, there's no band here who sounds like Boredoms or Blam Honey or Plus-Tech Squeezebox or Aki Tsuyoko or Space Streakings or any of those other crazy bands. And even stuff like Zazen Boys is better than any of the so-called "math rock" stuff we have here... But since I dont' live there, so I don't know if it has better jazz, rap, and other genres other folks might be more knowledgable of..

And whoever said that "great music is everywhere", yeah that's true, but that's kind of a crappy and easy answer... It always sucks when someone answers like that in a thread; to me, the facts are pretty clear: Japan has a MUCH larger population, so it kinda wins by default.. but, really, it is just filled to the brim with SO MANY amazing and innovative musicians!

Yes, there still is innovation out there; I'm not sure if any genre has been completely sapped of innovative ideas, though certainly I haven't heard any bands recently where I've just been blown away to the point of going, 'Wow, I've never heard ANYTHING like this.' For the record, music that HAS just blown me away when I first heard it because of how innovative it was, I think of stuff like White Noise, The Residents, Harry Partch, Captain Beefheart, Boredoms, Omoide Hatoba, Melt Banana (I heard them when I was 14 so it was pretty nuts back then), Thinking Fellers Union Local # 282, and Silver Apples... I'm sure other musicians, when I first heard them, amazed me, but the artists I just listed made my jaw drop..

So yeah, I dunno. Most of my favorite artists are American, but that's only because I'm more knowledable of America (so, I guess in a way, I do have an unintended bias). But from what I can tell, Japanese artists seem a bit more focused on innovating. And that's very important to me. So yeah.

Actually, forget what I just replied with, I think pbradley's response is better. Ahem..

So the answer is "I don't know" followed quickly with "I don't really care."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth