Damn you Ohio!
 

How could you vote for that face?

Heehee :D

speaking of voting for hideous faces, mccain should NOT have gotten the nomination, ron paul should have. he was the best candidate in my opinion.
oh but wait, my opinion isn't valuable, so who cares, right?

i for one care what yr opinion is... i just tried to point out a couple of times in a very sarcastic way that if you cared what yr opinion was you'd have voted in the primaries and i hope that you head to the polls in november. that is all.

i'm going to vote just so john mccain doesn't end up president.

Don't blame you. That guys is the biggest war pig.

Because it is all about looks around here, isn't it. You people are soooo shallow. Grow up.

People aren't voting on a face, however, her cackle is yes, a tad unsettling. SNL has been pushing Hillary for the last two weeks and maybe it has something to do with her "surge." It's a bit ironic that working-class Ohioans who were devastated by NAFTA would rather vote for her than Obama. Barack won the major metro areas of Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati, but was too ethnic for the rest of the state. Pundits say the same scenario is set to go down in Pennsylvania.

we need a president with an unsettling cackle
no one has been afraid of america for a long time

Obama often looks like he's fighting gas pains, to me.

i can do a montage of the faces he makes if you'd like

nevermind i look like hell

Ha, yeah. If you can.

The media is so fucked up how they're manipulating the coverage of this whole thing. So Obama loses last night, and this morning on one of the cable news shows they were showing a very unflattering close up of Obama with one of those gas-pain expressions, and they showed a (rare) flattering shot of Hillary. It's all about perception.

bitch is scary

Think what you will, but I thought the video segments and commentary on this week's Real Time with Bill Maher was telling concerning Hillary's rollercoaster of mixed emotions and messages:

the quotes below are paraphrased comments

Hillary cries: "Woe is me...everyone is so hard on me...life is hard on me because I'm a woman."

Hillary is complemetary of Obama: "gotta please, gotta let him know I like his shirt and tie and that I'm proud to run alongside him..."

Hillary gets angry: "Obama is misrepresenting me...he's a snake like all the others!"

Hillary resorts to angry sarcasm: "I feel like no one is paying attention to me anymore. Oh that's right, you've got your magical prince now who is going to open up the heavens and bring change and hope and joy and peace and love and fix all the world's problems."

poor chelsea looks just like her too. same eyebrows and everything.

I'm trying to think the last time we had a good-looking president, though. Probably not since JFK. While Bill Clinton could look sartorially elegant, he's not what I'd call magazine handsome or anything.

JFK was not good looking. sorry kids.



chelsea even makes the same scary faces
oh jesus

So then I guess we've never had a good-looking president, if JFK doesn't count. I can't think of any, anyway. Ah, we Americans are all a bunch of dog-faced misfits, why should our presidents be any different.

To be fair, Obama is starting to show his stripes.

The one thing that was real, that I could count on as a tangible testament to his character, was that, like John Edwards, Obama was refusing campaign contributions from political action committees.

But now that things are rolling for him, Obama's already backed-off from this. He is in the process of returning the eighty-five million in funding he got from the Federal government for his campaign so that he will be free to take contributions from PACs.

So, I've stated it before when Edwards dropped out, and I'll state it again. America has once again fucked up and screwed themselves.
Now that Edwards is out of the running, unfortunately so is a chance for a better America, and a better world.

truth or rumor?

i googled but found nothing.

this is weird because his campaign's success is small donors. funny enough i can see this as his argument to back off from public financing (his take was: be free from large donors). but i digress.

link please?

Do you not get the feeling that the GOP is setting up John McCain as the human punching bag

cuz they know he will get his ass monkey stomped by Clinton/Obama?

Nope - the conspiracy theorist in me believes that the fix is in and McCain is going to win. He'll be easily manipulated by large corporations and that's all that's important. The voting machines are too easy to program to create the desired results.

guy on right............................................. ......^^^^^^^















not so much with the looks.

it's all relative:

it's all relative:




plus he was luckeeeeeeeee




his wife was beautiful

& his lovers: hotttt




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3JTM5G3o7U

that's not relative, that's 20 years later.....^^^^^^^


realtive would be relative to other dudes his age.



....^^^^^^^


like this one..... now there's a fine specimen.

(It's still a) rumor at this point, but one hears it from bipartisan voices, so it's probably true. At any rate,
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...jYwZjRlNTBhYmY=


http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/can...didateID=C0009

yeah that has been in discussion since magoo's funds started to dry up. it's been on the washington post, the mcneil lehrer news hour, blogs, etc. it's all speculation on what obama may do & it relates to his recent statement that he'd sit down with mccain to hammer out an agreement, etc.

nowhere there, though, says that "[Obama] is in the process of returning the eighty-five million in funding he got from the Federal government for his campaign so that he will be free to take contributions from PACs."

....so yr trying to tell me that this dude here







....is attractive only when compared to Richard Nixon. relatively.

must be why I wrote "at any rate"...
duh

lyndon Johnson


Tricky Dick


Eisenhower





JFK

duh??

...which is why i prefaced the excerpt from the (ack!) National Review by writing, "at any rate"...to imply that the info was supplementary rather than wholly explanatory as a source to substantiate the breaking news...sheesh.

at any rate, the only duh-worthy thing here is your implication that obama got any public financing (he hasn't) and that he's returning it (there's nothing to return) so he can get some PAC money (he won't).


MAGOO is the one who got public financing. he got it when his campaign was bankrupt.

the story goes like this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/us...ics/23fec.html
(that's from february 2007)

what this calls for, were obama the nominee, is that he returns the money he's received and sticks to $85 mil from public financing.

magoo, who is stuck with public financing now, is callign for obama to do as him
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalra...-attack-1.html

recently obama showed a bit of caution saying he'll "sit down with mccain to hammer out an agreement"-- he'll have to do that or eat his words or find a way out. but this has nothing to do with PACs-- his success has been with the small contributions online-- $50, $100, etc.

at any rate, magoo has no incentive to stay stuck with public financing and he's looking for a way out, but he'll face some troubles in the process
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23362651/

JFK was indeed good looking. For his era, he was very handsome.

i prefer his wife. though she mutated afterwards.

I don't know that a president makes all that much difference anyway, except in the event of Supreme Court nominations that could shape the law of the land for decades and in matters of foreign wars that could kill our sons and daughters for generations.

Okay, a president might make some difference.