Sonic Youth Gossip - Hitler kid taken from parents

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)

- Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)

- - Hitler kid taken from parents (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=29142)

Hitler kid taken from parents

"Without giving a reason, New Jersey police said 3-year-old Adolf Hitler Campbell, seen above with his parents, and his younger sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation and Honszlynn Hinler, were taken from their home and put into state custody. The family drew attention last month when a bakery refused to put Adolf's name on a cake" - http://news.aol.com/article/kids-wit...om-home/306100

well the parents are dumb-asses for naming him that.

what kind of statement are they trying to make? its just going to cause grief. so stupid

Funny/sad/ridiculous/America.

Well the parents should be slapped, but there's no information on exactly why they took the kid away. I doubt it's just because of the name.

Its cuz them joo lobyist control teh guvernment

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbradley

Its cuz them joo lobyist control teh guvernment

Hahahaha

I had no idea he had siblings with retarded names as well.

Also have you seen the parents? EEEEugggh

i know whats going on here, i am giving an exclusive to the world

This young Adolf Hitler is actually going to kill millions in the future in an attempt to recreate the past

then this team of do gooders got together and sent back in time their strongest man to take out the young Hitler

it all makes sense

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL

Could it be, that the only clue of salvation is that this baby adolf leaves behind its own machine hand as the clue to create itself???

By "young Adolf Hitler killing millions in the future," Alien means young Hitler's future because young Hitler actually goes back in time to kill and replace the first Adolf Hitler while first Hitler was a grade schooler. The first Hitler never became fuhrer because he was killed in secret and the Hitler we all know from history books is the time traveler. However, it was this original Hitler who shot the second Hitler in the bunker once the Shaman of Atlantis raised him from the dead and original Hitler teamed up with the Time Guardians. Adolf Hitler is alive, they just don't want you to know.

All five World Wars are actually one Dr. Who episode.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZEROpumpkins

his younger sisters, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation

excuse me but wtf??:mad:

Yeah I know. Weird eh.
Though one glance at their parents will explain it.

the neighbors called in abuse to child services.

"Deborah Campbell said authorities have noted previous domestic violence allegations against Heath Campbell from prior marriages. "This man has changed a whole lot," she said. "He loves his children. They're his world."

wait a sec - I went into the slide show on that article and there's a snippet that says

Quote:

French parents must choose baby names from an approved list. The laws are designed to prevent teasing.

That's messed up!! - but I can't find any info on the net to corroborate this statement. Is this even true?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mangajunky

wait a sec - I went into the slide show on that article and there's a snippet that says That's messed up!! - but I can't find any info on the net to corroborate this statement. Is this even true?

What about the boy named Sue? His name made him a man.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZEROpumpkins

Maybe it's a case of really bad misidentification.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker

What about the boy named Sue? His name made him a man.

Exactly - parents shouldn't be limited to a list provided by the government.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mangajunky

wait a sec - I went into the slide show on that article and there's a snippet that says That's messed up!! - but I can't find any info on the net to corroborate this statement. Is this even true?

Maybe there used to be a list a long time ago - I believe it was a legacy from the French Revolution - but the current law makes virtually any first name possible – unless it is deemed "contrary to the welfare of the child"…

Here is what the law says:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do;jsessionid=56C84CA4384AA3D2FD 4971C2F923C9BD.tpdjo10v_3?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006 420911&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&dateTexte=200 80805

With a translation here:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/html/c...ivil_textA.htm

Quote:

Art. 57

(Act of 7 Feb. 1924)

A record of birth shall indicate the day, the time and the place of birth, the sex of the child ["the first names given to him, the family name followed if there is occasion by the mention of the joint declaration of his parents as regards the choice made," (Act n° 2002-304 of 4 March 2002, Act n° 2003-516 of 18 June 20031] and, the first names, names, ages, occupations and domiciles of the father and mother, and if there is occasion, those of the applicant. If the father and mother of an illegitimate child, or one of them, are not indicated to the officer of civil status, nothing may be mentioned on the registers on this subject.

(Act n° 93-22 of 8 Jan. 1993) The first names of the child shall be chosen by his father and mother. "A woman who asked to keep her identity secret at the time of the delivery may make known the first names she desires to be given to the child. Otherwise, or where his parents are unknown, the officer of civil status chooses three first names the last of which shall take the place of a patronymic [replaced by "family name" (Act n° 2002-304 of 4 March 20021] to the child " (Act n° 96-604 of 5 July 1996). The officer of civil status shall write down at once the chosen first names on the record of birth. Any first name entered on the record of birth may be chosen as the usual first name.

Where these first names or one of them, alone or combined with the other first names or the name, appear to him to be contrary to the welfare of the child or to the rights of third parties to the protection of their patronymics [replaced by "family names" (Act n° 2002-304 of 4 March 20021)], the officer of civil status shall give notice thereof to the Government procurator* without delay. The latter may refer the matter to the family causes judge*.

Where the judge considers that the first name is not consonant with the welfare of the child or interferes with the rights of third parties to the protection of their patronymics [replaced by "family names" (Act n° 2002-304 of 4 March 20011], he shall order its removal from the registers of civil status. Where appropriate, he shall give the child another first name which he himself fixes in the absence of a new choice by the parents that be consonant with the interests aforesaid. A mention of the judgment shall be entered in the margin of the records of civil status of the child.
1 Shall come into force on 1 Jan. 2005

edit: I did some more research and can't help posting the results here:

Apparently, the legislation was always quite restrictive for the choice of first names, but this changed in 1993 with a new law that was much more flexible...

Here is what wikipedia (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nom_(dr...s_pr.C3.A9noms) says:

Quote:

Le choix des prénoms

Le choix appartient aux parents. Les prénoms doivent être mentionnés dans le bon ordre. La loi du 8 janvier 1993 a modifié la loi du 11 germinal an XI. Autrefois, le choix des prénoms n’était pas libre mais réglementé. Lorsque le prénom choisi ne correspondait pas à une liste (calendriers...), l’officier d’état civil devait refuser d’enregistrer ce prénom. Cette réglementation posait un problème. Il appartenait au maire d’enregistrer ou non les prénoms et certains maires étaient moins contentieux que les autres.

La loi du 8 janvier 1993 inverse le principe : la liberté dans le choix des prénoms. La nouvelle réglementation est incorporée à l’article 57 du Code civil français : « l’officier d’état-civil doit enregistrer les prénoms qui lui sont donnés quels qu’ils soient. » Toutefois, le législateur a voulu éviter que certains parents affublent leurs enfants de prénoms difficiles à porter. En effet, s’il semble à l’officier que le prénom est contraire à l’intérêt de l’enfant, il doit l’enregistrer quand même mais aviser le procureur de la République. Ce dernier peut alors saisir le juge aux affaires familiales qui statuera alors.

And here is some more info on the French legislation on first names:
http://www.prenoms.com/legis/

It's all in French but in case someone happens to be fascinated by the topic, I reckon he could have it translated online.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tesla69

Unless they are black or jewish, of course.

The name restriction thing is one of those laws that I would vote against without hesitation, but I wouldn't be happy doing it.

Yeah restricting names is a very retarded/French thing to do. But there is a line where some names are just ridiculous and attention seeking.

Yeah, like the little kids names for the article. How retarded though, like really? What were they thinking?

I'm gonna guess his parents were Neo-Nazis, they deny it though. Where's the Jew media spinning shit out of control when you need it?

Also, anonymous rocked the poll vote:
Do you think it's appropriate to name a child after Adolf Hitler?
Yes 65%
No 35%

Ridiculous on both counts.

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮Huh?

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮test

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZEROpumpkins

Yeah restricting names is a very retarded/French thing to do.

I don't know… Many people seem to agree in this case that it is cruel - "contrary to the welfare of the child" - to call your child "Adolf Hitler" (just like it would be cruel to call your child "Littleshit" or "Cuntface"... or to a lesser extent "ROFLMAO" or "!@#$%!" or "Xxxxüüüüü", or I don't know, super-long names) - the French legislation gives an opportunity to prevent this, that's all… I am sure many (most?) countries have similar legislations…

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZEROpumpkins

Yeah restricting names is a very retarded/French thing to do.

ha yeah

Oh I love America, only the stupid get on T.V.

since when is having bad taste illegal? It sucks that they named thier kid that but what law are they breaking? The "dont name your kid after a dictator" law? There's a little something called freedom of speech in the US (or at least their used to be) and just because you dont agree with someones view doesnt make it illegal. I mean the kkk can still talk racistly in public.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dazedcola

the kkk can still talk racistly in public.

which is not something the US should be proud of.
but to each their own.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dazedcola

since when is having bad taste illegal?

When that bad taste jeopardizes their child's future as an accepted member of society.

Parents should not be allowed to make their children victims of public opinion just because they think their selves are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbradley

When that bad taste jeopardizes their child's future as an accepted member of society.

Parents should not be allowed to make their children victims of public opinion

that should be turned into a law.
i'm all for freedom of expression, but this is criminal.
You're creating a PERSON and INSTANTLY ruining his / her life.

You could name a kid Ghengis Khan and no one would give a damn

in a century or so no one will give a fuck if a kid is named adolf hitler.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbradley

Grandfather paradox!

Quote:

Originally Posted by pbradley

Perfect thing to say. These people shouldn't be able to do this to their children.

Hegemony has to be the single most misunderstood concepts.