What should I get?
 

McDonalds or Burger King?

mc donalds is smaller and more tasty but burger king is bigger and cheaper

burger king is just better in each and every way.

^ I agree. Everything about McDonald's is wrong.

Yeah, I was thinking about Burger King, Oh great Breakfast is over, now I need lunch.

Well I am going to get Burger King later.

FOr those who want to know I had McDonalds cause I did not want to drive to Burger King.

Burger King is better. But Carls Jr is the best.

maybe for you. i get to tear you to pieces with my teeth.

here we go again with cannibalism.

hilarious. now let's post pictures to drive everyone even further into the void of disgust.

well that is what my lunch is going to be tonight.

i'll take "a clue" for $400, alex.

Wendy's is superior to all other fast-food chains combined.

I like McDonalds.

why i don t like mc.d ? ask me or eat me.

Wendy's suck ass, it is overpriced I prefer In&Out.

My work is right by Wendy's. Im tired of it

Both suck. Stay home and make a sandwich.

McDonalds rules!

A vegemite sandwich. Afterwords, go off and become a felon and end up in Australia.

Or your town. It's pretty bumfuck, yeah?

now he is losing the power to string sentences.

Oh, you guys.

You're doing the whole Get a clue, get a clue thing again. It's a terrible defense mechanism. It's like glass.

i dare you to prove i written more than one "now he is losing the power to string sentences." posts.

and the reason i kept repeating that you should get a clue is because you didn't understand it, you still don't.

By this post alone, you prove you really don't have the right to judge whether anyone understands anything or not.

You use the same tactic everytime whether relevant or not. Therefore I repeat: It's a terrible defense mechanism.

what a fucked up unreasonable idiot...now i feel sorry for you.

You don't really. You're saying that purely because you have nothing left. Again with the same tactic, you have everything and I have nothing. It's a terrible way of 'debating'.

look man, your whole debate/pseudo psychological attacks are not fooling anyone but you, you try to neutralize a post i make by trying to deconstruct it and typing psychological big words like "defense mechanism" when the one that's being defended is you, all my posts are responded with deconstructions from your part, you are not being offensive, you are trying to uncover my "masks" and "insecurities" and when i don't take your bait and insult you again, you throw another one, and just make up conditions like me being defensive or repetitive and childish. that's why i feel sorry for you, the only person you are fooling is yourself.

now tell me something, you big smart guy: if i'm so childish and unreasonable and pathetic, how come you get so offended by my posts?

Bumfuck? Maybe. Worthless meth hole? Absolutely.

That has nothing to do with the conversation and I am the complete opposite of my surroundings. Besides, I'm staying in Northfield for the time being at St. Olaf which is very non-bumfuck.

Everything that is highlighted/bold, is incorrect.

I have never been offended at any of your posts as I know none of them hold any truth. Like wise if you complimented me. I wouldn't feel anything as you don't know me, nor do I know you, hence you lose most, if not all, meaning to me. And I don't ever recall calling you any of them parts which are italic. But after all, it is yoiur story.

then why are you so offended when i post that australia should be bombed?

Just because I reply or think that it's a stupid comment, doesn't mean I'm offended.

you can deny anything you want but your posts are there; you can't stop contradicting yourself.

and just before you twist this, by your posts i mean that everytime me or hayden mention bombing australia you attack us and call us stupid, yeah us, not the post or the idea.

Your annoying persistence implies the fuck out of the fact that you're offended.

I'm not twisting anything. Are you denying certain comments you make aren't stupid?

hahahahaha, i mut say i enjoyed that first bit.

That would mean you're offended, too. We've both been back and forward with the posts. Difference is that it's always been you or your buddy starting it towards me. Which would suggest a mean grudge. I don't hold a grudge as I'm not offended. I reply because I'm being posted to.

yes, they are stupid; are you getting offended and you think it's fair to be attacking and insulting me personally, which as you have stated over and over again, don't know me etc. etc.?