[DaveCromwell]

Originally Posted by RanaldoNecro

Both of you missed the point of this interview altogether. I am sure if he came out and said something Kim would say something like "What makes you assume that" or "Its just a media construct" or "false stereotype". So the interviewer played to that level, and the whole thing became flat with awkward silences.

So . . . "flat with awkward silences" was the point?

Rapid fire, Larry King, point and shoot questions wouldn't act with Moore. Its more about following someones wits than 'cornering them'.

I understand that tactic.

Think of this interview like a dance, that both parties have to follow as oppossed to 'a kill'.

I certainly wasn't endorsing any kind of "kill". Just didn't expect that kind of ramble.

I think the presenter is quite impressed with himself.

Matching wits with Thurston would be a battle enough.

Thurston seemed rather agreeable to converse in a relaxed and non-confrontational manner.

So, perhaps the interviewer did a "good job" after all.