Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pax Americana
Look, I'm not trying to be a cunt or a jerk or anything, and I really don't think being skeptical of something makes one close-minded. Shit, if I see some real, tangible, provabl
e evidence of the existence of ghosts, I'll be the first person to say, "Holy shit! Ghosts are real! Guess I was wrong." But I'm uncomfortable believing in something when (in my opinion) there is no credible evidence to support it. That's all.
I mean, would you call me a close-minded cunt for saying, "Man, believing in unicorns is kinda dumb." just because there might be someone out there who believes in unicorns?
|
being a natural skeptic vs. being a definitive naysayer are two different things.
saying "I want more proof" is not the same as saying "no fucking way".
it just seems that certain people thrive on the sense of negative attention that one receives after getting high and typing.
certain people like cunts.
ps: unicrons are real. gtfo my forum.