View Single Post
Old 01.27.2011, 05:38 AM   #192
rappard
expwy. to yr skull
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: My chair
Posts: 1,452
rappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's assesrappard kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
Anything that compresses to shrink file sizes cannot do so without affecting harmonic content
So even zipping and then unzipping a wave file would affect content?

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
multichannel audio files over 5.1 and above.
OK, here's my challenge: provide a proper 5.1 wave file (24/96 if you have one), and prove that it suffers from encoding and decoding to FLAC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
If flac was such the magic bullet pro audio programs would offer it as an input record option, however this is not the case.
Sound Devices recorders are not "professional equipment"?
http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/re...c-limitations/

Also:
http://www.2l.musiconline.no/shop/di...m.asp?id=34188

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
If you run a .flac and a .wav or .aiff through a hardware spectrograph the compressed file of the flac will have different readings to the .wav and .aiff. This is fact as I have seen it to be true with my own eyes and ears.
OK. So post the wave file (or a snippet thereof) here.

In the end, if you want to blabber nonsense about compressed file formats without supplying proof I don't care as long as I don't have to listen to it.
__________________

rappard is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|