[Glice]

I find it less worrying that floatingslowly has had more than one relationship in the last 20 years and more worrying that anyone can give so much as half a sloppy drunk fuck about what he's done with his penis. Because no-one's asking questions about the women concerned's sex life, I can only assume it's some bizarre homosexual thing where the gay desire for floatingslowly's not-spectacular-public-sexual-history may only be enacted through scurillous non-rumours of the female partners being grown and explicitly consenting adults.

Paedo debate: It's important to remember that while post-pubescent women associate less pubic hair with the pre-pubescent phase, most heterosexual men have no inherent association of pubic hair with pre- or post-pubescent women; the assumption that they do have that association is also the assumption that most men want no pubic hair, which is to say, it's one of those odd sexisms that's generated almost exclusively from gynophobia, or self-hating women.

I'm not saying that porn culture doesn't contribute to problems in sexual (particularly heterosexual) dialogues, but the associations are more complex than the simplistic (and no less unctuous therefore) 'every man is a potential rapist' or 'all porn is rape' things.

Edit: You've all typed things while I was typing that. So you can all cunt off. Except knox, who's invited around for a cup of tea and a flick through the freemans catalogue for dungarees.