so im reading this list of "basic human needs" (post-maslow) and i see there listed next to each other "identity" and "freedom"
- subsistence
- protection
- affection
- understanding
- participation
- leisure
- creation
- identity
- freedom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...ation_of_Needs
identity is belonging (to a group, obviously).
then later thinking about global corporate rule (which got me started on this "basic human needs" search in the first place) i remember how belonging and freedom can so often be at odds, i.e., "this is what we as a group do and you can't break the rules"
then i realize (it's not like i invented gunpowder, but anyway, even 2+2 requires an operation) you can have your cake and eat it if you have power. you simultaneously belong (at the very center) and have freedom (to create rules). needs = met.
a society of free individuals would have to be by necessity (?) one of reasonably distant and loosely associated people. a frontier-like kind of environment with little personal fiefdoms.
crowd people in cramped quarters and with all the mandatory belonging and competing drives for "freedom" (to lord it over others) a hierarchy will quickly emerge.
for this very reason I AM MOVING TO ANCTARTICA.
