[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ilduclo

yes, you're defining morality in this situation, then condemning others for breaching your def. There actually isn't an ethical problem in taking pay TV for free.

it's not the "others" im condemning, it's the ARGUMENTS.

again, i have a long list of offenses, and i know they're actual offenses, and im not gonna pretend they're not. i just rather keep it private or between me and my confidants. which the internet isn't. but that's besides the point.

human fallibility is a thing. i ahve no problem with that. it's a fact of life. but i have a problem with bullshit rationalization and fake claims of purity.

there isn't an ethical problem in taking pay tv for free?

please explain that. please explain it well, like you're trying to convince someone logically, rather than make yourself appear innocent by pointing the finger at someone else and deflecting.

i really wanna find a good argument here instead of blatant denials. something that holds up to examination.