View Single Post
Old 11.07.2019, 07:19 AM   #7413
h8kurdt
invito al cielo
 
h8kurdt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
h8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's assesh8kurdt kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
What I described is an interpretation of Anglo-American jurisprudence granting maximum advantage to the Democrats' point of view. Certain of the rights of the defendant (I.e., President Trump) which you have enumerated pertain primarily at the phase of the trial before the Senate, and, in an ordinary criminal proceeding, would not really effect the pre-indictment (I.e., pre-impeachment) phase of the proceedings.

***

I have tried to make plain my insistence that the failure to adhere to the (admittedly non-binding) precedents of the impeachment proceedings against President Nixon and President Clinton, combined with the insistence upon secrecy in the current hearings (a secrecy repeatedly violated by Representative Schiff by means of his constant leaks to the press of testimonial tidbits favorable to the Democrats' political posture) clearly compromises any Democratic claim as to the legitimacy of any impeachment documents they may present before the Senate

Classic
__________________


Down with this sort of thing.
h8kurdt is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|