|
These days it's not really feasible & is definitely not advisable to "sue the city" or whatever, although it sounds to me as if truncated, in my opinion, without knowing all the particulars of the facts from the incident, is entitled to compensation (that of course she cannot possibly hope to receive which only serves to add insult to injury) for the whole thing. If the city is going to allow assemblies of that nature that actively engage passers-by then the city is liable or should at least make assurances that through actual due process (you know, that stuff we pay taxes for & rarely receive) that the individuals who were a catalyst to the whole thing (the people that approached truncated initially) are held responsible.
|