View Single Post
Old 08.09.2006, 01:02 AM   #5
silverfreepress (sdasher)
the destroyed room
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 588
silverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's assessilverfreepress (sdasher) kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daddylikes
I don't understand this primary at all. Lamont does not have a platform at all (outside of "I oppose Bush"). Lieberman has been an OUTSTANDING senator, has a BEAUTIFUL record and has a 97 percent party line voting rate. Perhaps he doesn't oppose Bush's war record, but he falls in line with the Democratic party in ALL other areas. Whereas Lamont is a D.C. outsider, has no record whatsoever and no experience. I understand that the CT Dems feel like they're making a stand, but it is the most retarded stand they could make to oppose the war.

I actually hope that Lieberman defeats Lamont in the fall (and I'm almost sure he will).



You think its "retarded" to oppose war?
silverfreepress (sdasher) is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|