Quote:
|
Originally Posted by atari 2600
wax --- you're gettin' all high & mighty. Look, I would have written the same thing you did save the overwhelmingly likely fact that he attempted to flee & punched someone in the process.
CHOUT knows the person better than I ever will, he made the post, & while the police blotter is often riddled with inaccuracies (I've experienced this personally), I doubt the police blotter would make up events like that he punched an employee trying to stop him. Assault & fleeing the scene usually equals gulit, buddy boy, at least on the planet in which I live. When the lecher goes to court then he can have the slate wiped clean temporarily & his gulit will most likely be proven.
|
thats the point though, the slate wouldnt be wiped clean.
you seem to be pushin me into a corner where my only way out is to look as if im defending this guy. im not. its seems more likely he did it.
my point is, he may not have. the article first suggests that this guy touched the girls ass. thats all most people need to read. it then goes on to say that the guy did not in fact touch the girl.
sure running away and punching someone kinda makes you think he is guilty, but he may not be guilty of what people say he is. CHOUT said he was a fucked up guy, got some problems but never thought he would do something like that.
im not interested in going back and forth with this. my point was pretty fucking simple in the first place, but i end up making it again for you.
i know what come next.