Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Glice
I will go so far as to say: Interesting that he repeats the American ideological fallacy of talking about freedom, anarchy and liberties beyond the perview of the 'conventional' tenets of 'power', whilst commiting himself to a (probably Hegelian) dialogue of polar positions, opposition and neo-power structures. Which is often why very few people take American intellectuals seriously
|
I'd be interested to know what you read, on such matters?