Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kegmama
Damn you picky bitches! Good thing Inhuman is a kind, and obviously patient soul; becuz I probably would have kicked your judgemental asses cyber-style a long time ago.
Constructive but kind criticism in cool when asked, but keep in mind the fact that he is willing to take the time to do this, and to lead the effort, and that's awesome. Buying the domain name, doing the graphics, offering us review and programming rights, etc. None of our lazy asses are making it happen.
(There... That's your spanking from Mama tonight)
I'm looking forward to the final product and active site man, keep on kicking ass.
|
Thanks Kegmama! You're dead on about the criticism and ideas, I really like the constructive criticism, and as long as it remains
constructive then there's no prob! It's nice to get some ideas and I'd be glad to have all of you working on this together with me, but I'm really not looking for joking around with it and writing about some of the ideas mentioned. Haha, even though I couldn't agree with you more everyneurotic about interpol, it would be better we keep their name stayed on pitchfork where they belong.
And Alex's Trip is also correct about why I'm asking all of you to help; because it's people like you that will be viewing the site, so suggestions are welcome, but I'm just planning to do sort of a general review site for reviewing artists too underground to go on pitchfork. But by all means we can have reviews criticizing terrible bands, I'd just rather not have official sections of the page devoted to them.
Anyway, in regards to the layout, I'm going to add a little bit during my spare today. There's a few more things I need to add (message board button, search box, Privacy Policy button, links) and fix (maybe switch "features" to something else, fix edges so they look better, expand columns).
Thanks again for the input. I'll probably be back on later today