Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Norma J
Again, you're all thinking 1D. A ban on animal testing (which is indeed torture, it doesn't matter whether the intention is to torture or not, the outcome is the same) does not mean there would not be cure for disease. It would mean that people either have to come up to the plate and take resonsibility for their own actions (and diseases) and test on themselves (There is people with sickness', terminal or not, who would quite happily test on themselves to help thereselves and others) as opposed to subjective something innocent which has not consented to such harm and cruelty. It baffles me as to why man can send man to the fucking moon, but has to use animals for testing. Thats pathetic.
Do you see the irony in this statement?
It's all sorts of hypocritical and selfishness.
|
you're saying that you'd rather not have all the medical developements and research khchris listed?
what is this strange emotional retardation you have that allows you to place the so-called "innocent" animals above the (presumably) guilty human race?