Thread: bukowski sux
View Single Post
Old 01.10.2007, 05:05 PM   #21
racehorse
100%
 
racehorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 784
racehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's assesracehorse kicks all y'all's asses
bukowski is great. i love bukowski.
when you say he was shit, i disagree. he wrote poetry that was true to his life, and honest to god.
he was a spit in the face to the conservative poetry snobs that believed poetry should be about certain designated subjects and should avoid others. bukowski showed that he could write a poem about taking a shit if he wanted, and it would contain all of his juicy, witty rambling style, that would be just as valuable as a piece of poetry as anything else.

what the fuck is talent anyway? he showed that you didn't need genius spouting out of every pore to write a poem, it is equally valuable to have a mind that can soak up experiences and situations in his trademark insightful manner, and put it down in a way that is funny, interesting and often insightful to read.
he and the other writers around the time were questioning "what is poetry", so WHAT IS POETRY???
bukowski for president
__________________
She holds the room up by talk alone
racehorse is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|