View Single Post
Old 02.08.2007, 05:09 AM   #1
SpectralJulianIsNotDead
invito al cielo
 
SpectralJulianIsNotDead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,409
SpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's assesSpectralJulianIsNotDead kicks all y'all's asses
Einstein?
Da Vinci?
Michelangelo?
Newton?
Tesla?
Bell?
Edison?
Socrates?
Shakespeare?
Dante?
Milton?
Dostoyevsky?
Cervantes?
Goethe?
Nietzsche?
Bach?
Beethoven?
Descartes?
Aristotle?
Galileo?
Tchaikovsky?
An ancient architect?
Hawking?
Hitchcock?
Nabokov?
Kubrick?
Kierkegaard?
Sartre?
Jesus?
Mohammed?
Buddha?

(keep in mind there are many other choices to be had here, these are just some suggestions)

Don't rule out the great artists because of lack of contributions to
science. I think a great artist must have an abnormally well grasp of the universe (for a human that is) to really be able to make beautiful art.



Give some reasons too. I'm not sure I have an opinion as of yet, but I'd be tempted to sway towards a philosopher or an artist(writer, painter, composer) over a man of science.
SpectralJulianIsNotDead is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|