Thread: star wars vs. star trek
View Single Post
Old 04.25.2006, 10:10 AM   #19
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,729
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
oh, i'm not a trekkie, but star wars is complete & utter shit and if you don't think so you need to eat more fish.

star trek was way ahead of its time in many ways (the original), you terminal fools.... the others were on and off but they were tv series, so what do you expect? the 1st star wars was ok because or the influence of joseph campbell... after he died, lucas was revealed for the lame turd he is.

besides that, the whole political shituation-- star wars is ruled by lords & aristocracies and a handful of heros saving the whole fucking universe. star trek in spite of the need for main characters depends on teamwork & the working stiff to make things run. there is no single illuminated individual blah blah blah. democracy beats feudalism any time.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|