|
I was just trying to parse your post. I thought you said we were ingesting urges in the second sentence, but then I realized that you might be referring to the thrills mentioned in the title. I didn't mean for my tone to be confrontational. I was just trying to clarify. You clearly say that dynamics that are dictated by one's working brain shouldn't be expected to be "in your face," but that they are "in your face" due to the amount of passion.
I was just wondering if passion allows for the creation of louder dynamics or if the dynamics are still the opposite of "in your face," whatever that is (I was assuming quiet). So, quiet in any case, but now "quiet, but passionate," which is, in other words, "in your face." As oppossed to "quiet, but dispassionate," which isn't "in your face."
Does "in your face" imply certain dynamics? What is it about dynamics that are dictated by a working brain that would lead you to expect them not to be "in your face?" Is not passion also a function of a working brain? Where do non-working brains enter into the mix?
|