Thread: Linguistics
View Single Post
Old 04.26.2006, 11:34 AM   #8
Glice
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
Glice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's assesGlice kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iain
What exactly is this hypothesis?

Actually, I have been reading a bit about the origins of the various Celtic languages and that is pretty interesting. The Cumbric words for the numbers are great.

Sapir/ Whorff - better known as absolute linguistic relativity. Or rather, our languages severly restricts/ prohibits our ability to comprehend concepts outside of the ken of our language - One language may have a tense or series of words which express something which is inexpressible in another language. Inuits and snow, for instance.

The theory is a load of gack. It's utterly fascinating, but very very dangerous philosophically (except in those instances where Feyerabend uses it, because he's clever enough to do it).

I'd like to add a nod to Atari.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage Clone
Last time I was in Chicago I spent an hour in a Nazi submarine with a banjo player.
Glice is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|