Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
i've never read this potter crap. but you sickos are making me want to...  |
I wasn't going to (I figured "kids book" and moved on). however, my wife started reading it to my son and she suggested I read it. I'm glad I did. although it does appeal to children, it's a really good story.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex's Trip
It makes sense that he'd be a Hoarcrux, but I would think that Voldemort would just kill him. Although I can easily see Voldemort saying "I didn't want to kill the one guy who could kill me, but I did want to make sure that he'd have to die in order to kill me." Also, I think the locket in Grimauld Place is a Hoarcrux.No shit.  |
if he killed him, the last shard of his soul would "die" and he would go with it imo. and yeah....Harry would have to die to kill him.
my guess is that given the fact he couldn't kill Harry he made him a Horcrux instead. it's why Harry has shared his vision in the past. he's bound to him; whatever happened wasn't just a deflected spell.
I ROLL TWENTIES.