View Single Post
Old 04.24.2007, 02:44 AM   #49
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,731
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptowonderdruginvogue
well, we wont know until we try
at least stay in there for another 2 years.
or bring in the UN troops.

yes try but try what?? see the "what" is the problem.

i believe the longer the u.s. troops stay the longer they postpone the inevitable demise of iraq. it's going to be like yugoslavia splintering into serbia, montenegro, croatia, and bosnia. remember bosnia?

if at least there was a policy change, but trying to artificially hold iraq together is a pipe dream. those guys are determined to fight each other and it's going to be civil war or a new tyranny.

ok here's an argument for keeping the troops there: to keep iraq from falling into iranian hands. could happen... will happen eventually i think. though a lot of iraquis hate iran because of their past wars.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|