Thread: John or Paul?
View Single Post
Old 05.07.2007, 06:11 PM   #25
lungfish
bad moon rising
 
lungfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: nyc
Posts: 236
lungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asseslungfish kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by afterthefact
I'm glad to see there are no Yoko haters here, at least so far. I'm sick of people saying she broke up the beatles. Fact is, they needed to break up.

true, i agree. they definitely needed to break up and progress outside of the Beatles stigma.
but Yoko certainly didn't help matters, as far as the band trying to staying together is concerned.
it wasn't her 100% fault, as it was no ones, but she definitely made it painfully clear, as others did, that the Beatles were going down the tube.
Paul held on to the very end though, wanting to keep the "myth" alive.
John mostly was true to himself and just said "fuck it" haha.
his heart was no longer in the whole Beatles craze. he hated it from early on.
Yoko, in a sense, for John's sake, helped him break out, helped him gain more confidence. She was his fuel to drive. and so on.
thank god for her in that sense.
and of course for her work.
lungfish is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|