View Single Post
Old 06.18.2007, 01:17 PM   #6
pantophobia
expwy. to yr skull
 
pantophobia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,349
pantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's assespantophobia kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrungeMonkey
Which do you think is the more musically talented, taking into account both their work with the Beatles and their respective solo careers? Its been the subject of a furious debate with my friends today. It was pretty even either way. I'm more of a Lennon person myself.

considering the wording of your question, it's Paul, while John was the better lyricist, he couldn't match the output of Paul's extensive almost assembly line rate of music from classical to avant-garde composition
pantophobia is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|