Quote:
Originally Posted by sarramkrop
Of course it's not, and I seriously think that anyone who does think that it is art quite possibly hates art in general. Even arguing about it is pointless, in this time and age. Seriously, with all the steps forward that humans achieved over the years, I cannot understand why some people are so mentally lazy.
|
I think that you have a very narrow view of what is art and what is not. That view seems to be that if
you can see it's artisitic merit then it is art, and if
you don't like it then it isn't art. That's what's known as an opinion.
Just because people don't agree with your opinion doesn't make them wrong, and just because you don't like certain artworks, that doesn't lessen their merit as works of art.
Personally, I can't stand a single thing that Mark Rothko has produced, but I can accept that he is an artist and that what he produces is art.
Not all art is produced for your approval.