Quote:
|
Originally Posted by noumenal
I think the LSAT is easier to study for because law schools want the LSAT to reflect not only brain power, but also your level of motivation. Law school is so competitive and it seems to reward hard work and dedication almost more than knowlegde or grasp of concepts, so it makes sense that the entrance test should reflect the amount of work put into studying for it in addition to aptitude.
How many different ways can I type the same sentence? Let me see...What's wrong with me?
Somebody at work Saturday told me that most people are weird in some way, but not ACTUALLY weird. And I was one of the few ACTUALLY weird people that they'd ever met. You know, it's fun to say, "He's weird." But with me, I'm ACTUALLY weird, it's not just a figure of speech. I wasn't sure if I should have my feelings hurt or feel complimented.
|
yeah, i'm planning on picking up a book full of sample lsats as soon as i finish the semester this week. when i took a sample this january on my own i got a 165 without ever having looked at an lsat before. i did well in everything except reading comprehension (which has always been my weakness, ever since elementary school -- with the fluke exception of my perfect sat verbal), though i think i took
waaaay longer than the allotted time for the games (i.e., analytical reasoning) section. this is what is scaring me -- the fact that you only have 35 minutes per section, not the difficulty level of the test itself. i'm accurate, but only if i have enough time, and i'm hoping that as i practice i'll improve my speed.
i know the feeling about being ACTUALLY weird . . . that most assuredly describes me.