Thread: reassessing goo
View Single Post
Old 09.02.2007, 08:28 AM   #41
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead-Air
Attacking "production" often strikes me as a way to try and claim that one's own taste is backed up by some sort of technical reality, when more often, it's just taste.

That can be the case, in terms of backing up 'taste' with some sort of 'objective' technical reality. Production issues are, by and large, issues of taste alone. I'd probably say that a record like White Zombie's Soul-Crusher is well produced, when in fact it just happens to have been produced in a way that I tend to like.

As such I'm sort of contradicting myself here when I still maintain that good ideas on Goo are largely buried under sonic flab. That said, reading Atari's and others comment's about Disappearer, I must've missed something. I've just stuck it on again to check that I'm not mad ... hmm, maybe I was a bit harsh. Looks like my reassessment is in chronic need of reassessment!
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|