View Single Post
Old 09.28.2007, 12:42 PM   #42
floatingslowly
invito al cielo
 
floatingslowly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,165
floatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePits
So tell me wtf you need two separate laws to deal with what can already adequately be dealt with in sentencing under one?

before I go back to working, I just wanted to say that I agree with you in principal, and wish that there could be just one set of laws.

it makes logical sense.

people just have a nasty way of breaking logical solutions. without some way to fill the gaps, heathens like our dear friend Hitler's 'lil Helper would be free to run amok as they will.

I also want to say that we aren't talking about thought control.

it's more about accountability for putting thought-to-action.



ok, now really. 2nd pot of coffee is done and I better just stop talking.
floatingslowly is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|