View Single Post
Old 09.29.2007, 06:21 PM   #79
ThePits
stalker
 
ThePits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 505
ThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's assesThePits kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by fugazifan
it is horrible that someone would oppose sexual preferance to be in the hate crime law.
and i do belive that there should be hate crime laws. not necesserilly worse punishment but definatly for the law to differentiate between crimes.
lets say there is a shopowner that owes the mob money and they burn down his shop.
and lets say that there is a shop keeper that is jewish and his shop is burnt down by neo nazis, simply for his being jewish.

so what you have is the same outcome, a burnt-down shop, and both arsonists should be arrested for the crime. but there must be awareness that one of the crimes was done because of bigotry.

its just like if a public place was blown up by either some crazy disgruntled worker or, if it was blown up by (for the sake of being current) an islamic terrorist.

There is no difference except the motive, the crimes are exactly the same, deal with the motives on sentencing

In both examples you end up with a burnt out shop and blown up people!
ThePits is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|