Thread: "Art" or abuse?
View Single Post
Old 10.22.2007, 01:29 PM   #7
m1rr0r dash
invito al cielo
 
m1rr0r dash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: atari
Posts: 2,228
m1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's assesm1rr0r dash kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SYRFox
This man's not an artist, now he should chain himself and die in a gallery, he'd see what his "art" is about

chaining the dog is one thing... may make the dog sad, but starving it to death is cruel and reprehensible. that being said, i don't agree at all with the idea that it then ceases to be art. it irritates me quite a lot when i hear people say "my four year old could do that, that's not art." that might make it bad art, but art none the less. the piece shown above is cruel and disgusting art that should not be afforded any of the tolerance given to something like peeing on each other or on a crucifix. but it is still art.
__________________
 
m1rr0r dash is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|