Quote:
|
Originally Posted by m1rr0r dash
i never said you said anything about whether it is art or not... it was simply the subtext of the original question: "art" or abuse? which implies that they are mutually exclusive.
...so why get defensive? we agree it is sick and shitty art. i was simply making a point about the way these things are always debated. and stating my belief that saying something is not art, when it clearly is (i.e. was done by an artist and shown in a gallery) is not only a useless semantic gesture, but fails to address what is ACTUALLY wrong with the artwork in question.
|
i wasnt getting defensive-all is cool
and pbradley basically summed it up quite well