|
Yeah, it's just far less energy expended overall; there's no fires, no smoke, no charcoals and no residue. It's kind of crazy, but it does the job of cremation well.
We've all seen demonstrations of experiments with liquid nitrogen.
The presenter dips a rose in the tube, removes the rose, then breaks the rose, for example.
It just kind of makes me wonder who in the hell thought to themselves first, "hey, if I substitute a dead body instead, it could then be pulverized which would be a cleaner form of burial."
|